Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قناة د.عبدالرحمن الخراز

Channel

قناة د.عبدالرحمن الخراز

@alkharazz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,899subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001262915867
TypeChannel
Username@alkharazz
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alkharazz

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8971,9071,9026 August 2026 — 1,907 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,906 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,903 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,902 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,901 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,900 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,901 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,900 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,897 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,899 subscribers1,8996 August 202615 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 40 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,896–1,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 15:381,899+2
12 Sept 2026, 03:211,897-3
7 Sept 2026, 17:401,900-1
2 Sept 2026, 20:281,901+1
22 Aug 2026, 00:281,900-1
18 Aug 2026, 15:441,901-1
12 Aug 2026, 19:041,902-1
9 Aug 2026, 17:521,903-3
7 Aug 2026, 03:501,906-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:471,907first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

23 Jun 2026, 20:45 UTC199 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alkinashaFile

ملف تفاعلي يحوي تسجيل اللقاء + الكتاب -محور اللقاء-. 📜 موضوعات بحثية في علم الأصول، لـ د. عبدالرحمن الخراز -شكر الله له- https://t.me/alkinasha/4260?comment=9483 #تفاعلية #أصول_الفقه #دردشة_أصولية #الكناشة

23 Jun 2026, 06:19 UTC213 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alkinashaPhoto

#دردشة_أصولية الثلاثاء 1/8هـ -إن شاء الله-

6 Jun 2026, 19:34 UTC381 viewsread 7 August 2026

ينبغي للفقيه ألا يكون أجنبيا عن باقي العلوم ✍🏼ابن الجوزي

10 May 2026, 20:41 UTC511 viewsread 7 August 2026

" قد قال الشافعي في الصحابة: ( رأيهم لنا خير من رأينا لأنفسنا ) ونحن نقول ونصدق أن رأى الشافعي والأئمة معه لنا خير من رأينا لأنفسنا " ✍🏼 ابن القيم

24 Apr 2026, 13:34 UTC565 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

" الواقع شريكٌ في استنباط الحكم الشرعي "

21 Apr 2026, 22:25 UTC467 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‏هو جزء من كتاب إعلام الموقعين، خرج باسم كتاب فتاوى إمام المفتين، وفتاوى رسول الله ﷺ ‏يقول ابن القيم عن هذه الفتاوى: ‏" فلله ما أجل هذه الفتاوى .. وما أحلاها، وما أنفعها .. وما أجمعها لكل خير .. فوالله لو أن الناس صرفوا همهم إليها لأغنتهم عن فتاوى فلان وفلان .. واله المستعان. "

21 Apr 2026, 14:16 UTC396 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

تعليق حول مسألة في الأحوال الشخصية، وهي إن الـDNA نفى النسب، إلا أن القضاء أثبت النسب:

17 Apr 2026, 09:39 UTC511 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

هنا مجموعة كتب فقهية قانونية، تعطي المتخصص فيهما إضافة في العلوم البينية، وتفعيل أصوب للقانون ببث روح الفقه فيه.

12 Apr 2026, 21:11 UTC562 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

كنت أحسب أن عمر الأشقر قد اقتصر تميّزه على كتب العقيدة، وأن البروز في علم الأصول هو لأخيه محمد الأشقر صاحب الواضح وأفعال الرسول ﷺ، غير أن هذا الكتاب كشف لي عن الثراء الأصولي للأشقر عمر، إلى جانب ما يظهر في تخريجاته الدقيقة في بقية مؤلفاته

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alkharazz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

أخبار الدراسات العليا ووظائف الجامعات.
@drasatolya · 73,044
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قناة د.عبدالرحمن الخراز” (@alkharazz), 1,899 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alkharazz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.