Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for リン lin

Channel

リン lin

@allcospl1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,490subscribers

-243 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001516288068
TypeChannel
Username@allcospl1
Descriptionво вопросам рекламы, сотрудничества: @blueberryglobal // @linkitins // @heIlYEAh3 // @blsslsls https://t.me/+y78_rsut0KU4ZDUy щп
Created26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/allcospl1

Topic

Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,2978,7338,5156 August 2026 — 8,733 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,726 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,701 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,681 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,659 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,632 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,605 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,570 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,546 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,534 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,512 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,493 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,465 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,441 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,389 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,339 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,314 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,310 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,297 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,450 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,527 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,520 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,503 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,490 subscribers8,4906 August 20263 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 89 days, net -243. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,232–8,798 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 04:318,490-13
30 Oct 2026, 23:488,503-17
28 Oct 2026, 10:088,520-7
25 Oct 2026, 00:388,527+77
22 Oct 2026, 06:298,450+153
18 Oct 2026, 13:168,297-13
15 Oct 2026, 16:488,310-4
12 Oct 2026, 14:578,314-25
5 Oct 2026, 19:188,339-50
28 Sept 2026, 05:568,389-52
15 Sept 2026, 10:408,441-24
12 Sept 2026, 02:568,465-28
7 Sept 2026, 11:168,493-19
2 Sept 2026, 19:268,512-22
30 Aug 2026, 11:258,534-12
27 Aug 2026, 12:468,546-24
24 Aug 2026, 23:198,570-35
21 Aug 2026, 02:348,605-27
18 Aug 2026, 03:428,632-27
15 Aug 2026, 10:478,659first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 8,490 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,610
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held73 (29 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total33,890
Reactions total2,427
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 22:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,230
Videos
≈1,600
Links
≈183

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,720 reactions across 72 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,35934.3%
🍓2,49719.6%
🌚1,53612.1%
custom 54427340452827150351,53412.1%
💘1,48611.7%
❤‍🔥8316.53%
💋3492.74%
👍970.763%
🎃310.244%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,991 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 73 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @allcospl1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 73 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (23.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 20:59 UTC≈1,060 views143 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

рост 155 vs the world

🍓81❤30💋19custom 54427340452827150358💘3🌚2

4 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTC≈1,500 views202 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

моя ботинка, красивая сумка незнакомой девушки из кофейни и снежок

🍓118❤53💋25💘4🌚2

4 Nov 2026, 18:26 UTC≈1,760 views217 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

какие то старые фотки с пяточками, не помню почему не выложила

💋124❤50🍓41❤‍🔥2

3 Nov 2026, 16:51 UTC≈2,280 views196 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

я говно в тиктоке когда это уже закончится?

❤121💘40🍓34💋1

3 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,040 views72 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

в последнее время всё чаще замечаю, что в учёбе мне не хватает хотя бы базовых знаний о дизайне. особенно когда дело касается презентаций и творческих работ: сессия скоро, хочется наконец сделать красиво, а не как получится 😢 у меня с этим целая история. мне хочется сделать красиво, современно и со вкусом! А в итоге можешь полчаса двигать один элемент на пару пикселей, менять шрифт, возвращать предыдущий и всё равно…

❤‍🔥39❤16💘12🍓4💋1

1 Nov 2026, 18:40 UTC≈2,950 views264 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

алина 2024 зашарила за лор алины 2026

🍓154❤63🌚40💋7

1 Nov 2026, 17:16 UTC≈2,980 views388 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

больная пьяная брошенная одинокая девка с проблемами с алкоголем и частичной амнезией:

❤234🍓86🌚54💘8🎃3💋3

30 Oct 2026, 14:56 UTC≈3,320 views152 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

ало я говно в тиктоке

🍓94❤32💘23custom 54427340452827150353

30 Oct 2026, 09:57 UTC≈3,210 views78 reactionsread 4 November 2026

🤮🤮🤮

🍓45🌚17custom 544273404528271503514❤2

30 Oct 2026, 09:56 UTC≈3,170 views260 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

So wait for you... And I'll burn. Will I ever see your sweet return?Oh, will I ever learn? Oh, lover, you should've come over

🍓155💘55🌚38❤8custom 54427340452827150353💋1

28 Oct 2026, 20:38 UTC≈3,330 views151 reactionsread 4 November 2026

убаюкивает меня сегодня бутылка соджу

❤92custom 544273404528271503524❤‍🔥19🌚11🍓3💋1💘1

28 Oct 2026, 20:37 UTC≈3,400 views217 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

милые собачки возвращение рпп желание исчезнуть и ничего и никогда больше не чувствовать. ни ко гда бесславные убьлюдки с музыкой из кухни

❤‍🔥118❤50🌚22🍓10custom 54427340452827150357💘6💋4

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @allcospl1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 6 posts on @allcospl1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
24 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Каменный клоун
@pebbliestpebble · 52,950
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“リン lin” (@allcospl1), 8,490 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allcospl1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.