safe and effective af any other string Twitter:

Channel
Crypto VIP Calls
@allcryptovipcalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001914604003 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @allcryptovipcalls |
| Description | All crypto KOLS and VIP channel calls here. Just join us. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 1 June 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/allcryptovipcalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 1 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 294
- Videos
- 16
- Links
- 705
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 40s
- Average length
- 1m 40s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
any other string Twitter:
to play the devil’s advocate here this is a free market, it’s a midwit move to be going after the buyers when we ourselves buy shitcoins all day the problem here is that the dev clearly doesnt give a fuck about holders, and people keep supporting them in this market we vote with our eth, it’s that simple, it doesnt matter what one thinks if you want more stupid ben presales / mints keep buying them, nobody will st…
any other string Twitter:
Sticker, posted without a caption
any other string Twitter:
hahahahaah fucking idiots any other string Twitter:
will they fall for his shit again??? any other string Twitter:
⚰️ any other string Twitter:
BSC - DYOR - 🌐 Multimillion Web3 *Promo* Working first time with the team but got vouched its safe! Good marketer behind! Might wait for dip...! More marketing planned... Whats the project about? 👨🚀 An ecosystem ready to reach the multimillion dollar level by selling ad space and promoting tokens started through the launcher, various assets or pools and to help them evolve ! MC: 10.8k USD Tax: 8/8 📈: https://…
oh wow who was the fat finger? any other string Twitter:
the best most fair launches are stealth launches, no discussion about it period any other string Twitter:
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @allcryptovipcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@allcryptovipcalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto VIP Calls” (@allcryptovipcalls), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allcryptovipcalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.