Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Allswaps

Channel

Allswaps

@allswaps_com

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

7,215subscribers

-268 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003410685837
TypeChannel
Username@allswaps_com
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/allswaps_com

Growth

7,2157,4837,3497 August 2026 — 7,483 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,475 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,456 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,419 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,391 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,367 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,334 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,309 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,286 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,257 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,215 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net -268. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,175–7,523 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 08:227,215-42
2 Sept 2026, 08:127,257-29
30 Aug 2026, 02:137,286-23
26 Aug 2026, 21:377,309-25
24 Aug 2026, 01:197,334-33
20 Aug 2026, 03:467,367-24
17 Aug 2026, 14:347,391-28
14 Aug 2026, 15:577,419-37
11 Aug 2026, 04:027,456-19
8 Aug 2026, 09:377,475-8
7 Aug 2026, 19:017,483first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.26%
avg views ÷ 7,215 subscribers
Avg views / post
235
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held22 (30 June 202618 August 2026)
Views total470
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

223 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12757.0%
👍4922.0%
🔥4620.6%
👎10.448%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC163 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Results are in! The first 5 new users who completed a swap after the post have each received $10: 0x6f3*****9b 0x1c0*****4a 0x539*****61 0x805*****b2 0x4cc*****d3 Rewards have been sent. Thank you for testing the aggregator. Allswaps compares top verified exchanges in real time and shows the best rate in one interface. No registration. We never hold your funds. More activities coming soon — stay tuned. Swap here:

👍73

14 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC307 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

👀 Tired of searching through exchange platforms for the best rates? Allswaps does it for you. We compare top exchanges and display the most favorable option, eliminating the need for manual searches across dozens of websites. No registration required, and we do not store your funds. Exchanges are conducted directly with our partners. We do not hold your coins. Over 50,000 exchange directions and 800 trading pairs

7👍6🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC526 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

This is not the finish — this is the start. The NFT airdrop is our gratitude to those who have been here since the early stages. But AllSwaps is moving forward, and the reasons to stay are not diminishing. 🔄 Swap — an aggregator that compares exchanges and finds the best rate for your pair. One interface instead of ten, and we never hold your funds. 🤖 AI Assistant — monitors the market 24/7 for your coins and hint

6👍5🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC457 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🎉 AllSwaps NFT rewards are out! Rewards for our NFT collection have just been sent to eligible holders in USDT on BNB Chain — in accordance with your allocation on the site: https://swap.allswaps.com/allswaps-airdrop-checker Amounts were based on NFT rarity, with multi-accounts and farmed wallets filtered out, so the full pool went to real holders only. Thanks for being with AllSwaps from the start — check your wa

10👍4🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC482 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🎁 Airdrop checker is live Check if you got an allocation — just paste your wallet address, no connection needed. 👉 https://swap.allswaps.com/allswaps-airdrop-checker Your allocation depends on your NFTs — how many you hold, their level, and their rarity. Rewards will be sent out within a week. 💸 Thank you to everyone who's been part of this project from the start — this is for you. 🙌

10👍5

28 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC613 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Feedback contest — winners We asked you to test AI Advisor and tell us what's missing. The response was sharper and more detailed than we hoped. Huge thanks to everyone who took part. Congratulations to our 10 winners: @om_antonjr @kayceeonyia @byhulg @Usmanu324 @fadeematund2 @dantchelle80988 @CoarchabbaWeb3 @d_fout15911 @AdamWeb3_1 @JAS_manino 💸 Each winner receives 5$ USDT (TRC20), sent to the wallet you prov

10👍4

27 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC528 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

📣 Where AllSwaps goes from here We're sharpening our focus, and we want to be straight with you about what that means. We're discontinuing the NFT side of AllSwaps, and we're not launching a token. No spin: these were things we could have kept pushing, but they pull energy away from what actually matters — building a product people use. We'd rather do one thing genuinely well than spread thin across mechanics that

7🔥7👍4

22 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC689 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Test AI Advisor — we're paying for the best feedback The beta is live and we want to hear from you. The 10 most useful pieces of feedback get $5 each. What to do: Sign up → https://ai.allswaps.com/ Build a portfolio from your coins Get your recommendations Explore the interface Fill out the form Feedback form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScY0cuXxSl28tOFrDA_JVQuqM-KWIBRb2xSeVchjA8Wsvwwnw/viewform The

12🔥4👍2

21 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC637 views20 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

AI that watches your crypto portfolio 24/7 — without access to your funds. 🚀 The AllSwaps team invites you to beta test AI Advisor – a tool for staying on top of your crypto portfolio without ever handing over access to your funds. News, on-chain, macro, whale moves — tracking it all by hand is impossible. And missing the one thing that actually matters for your coins? All too easy. AI Advisor by AllSwaps handles

🔥126👍2

17 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC734 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

📈 LEVEL UP You voted for new AI Advisor features. We heard you. NFT holders will soon gain access to the next stage of the Allswaps ecosystem 🚀 💎 And yes — your NFT level will matter. It will determine the order in which invitations are sent. ❗️ P.S. Make sure your account is verified: 🔵 add your email 🔵 connect your Telegram Otherwise, your invitation may not reach you. ➡️ allswaps.com 🌐 Website | X | TG CI

10🔥2

8 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC923 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @swapzone

Win $50 for the Best Question! Our Swapzone × @allswaps_com AMA is happening tomorrow, and we've got something extra for you. Drop your question for the AllSwaps team in the comments below. The author of the best question will receive $50! Don't forget to join us live tomorrow: you might hear your question answered during the AMA. Ready? Start asking! And see you tomorrow: https://x.com/i/spaces/1XGyggaXvYbxM?s=20

9

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @allswaps_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@allswaps_com edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Jul 2026, 05:16 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Which AI advisor feature matters most to you❓❓❓

  1. Pre-trade risk assessment29%
  2. NFT crafting suggestions for my wallet48%
  3. Alerts on best pair conditions32%
  4. Other idea. Write in the comments.👇16%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Allswaps” (@allswaps_com), 7,215 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allswaps_com.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.