Так происходит в большинстве случаев , и в этом заложена логика заполнения ордеров на покупку и на продажу. Худшее что мы можем сделать в торговле , это войти в Лонг в Шорт зоне 📈
🔥4❤2
Signed Sergei Almazoff

Channel
@almazovtrade
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,949subscribers
+33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001876942589 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @almazovtrade |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/almazovtrade |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 1,949 | +27 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 1,922 | +40 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 1,882 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 1,887 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 1,896 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 1,899 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 1,902 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 1,903 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 1,905 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 1,909 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 1,912 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 1,914 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 1,916 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 1,916 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
323 reactions across 22 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 199 | 61.6% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 13.9% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 8.36% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 6.81% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 3.10% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.24% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.929% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.929% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 0.619% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.619% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 0.619% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.31% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Так происходит в большинстве случаев , и в этом заложена логика заполнения ордеров на покупку и на продажу. Худшее что мы можем сделать в торговле , это войти в Лонг в Шорт зоне 📈
🔥4❤2
Signed Sergei Almazoff
После взрывного роста в шорт зоне , стоимость вновь уходит ниже границ 1W
👍5
Signed Sergei Almazoff
3️⃣ Когда алгоритм можно считать рабочим? Увидеть хороший результат на истории - это только первая часть работы. Совсем другое дело - подтвердить его в реальной торговле на бирже. Для этого должны одновременно выполняться три условия. 1. Торговая идея должна быть подтверждена на истории Даже если логика кажется убедительной, разработчик может ошибиться. Можно неправильно сформулировать условия, допустить ошибку…
👍8🔥3
Signed Sergei Almazoff
Продолжим серию постов на важные темы. Это поможет понять что такое торговля , здесь больше про алгоритмы , но много пересечений с ручной торговлей .
🔥5
Signed Sergei Almazoff
Локальные объемы исполненных ордеров на покупку/продажу по BTC не достигают аномальных значений. Оповещений в тлг приходит при значениях выше. Очевидно преобладание покупателей в умеренном размере.
🔥5
Signed Sergei Almazoff
Для работы внутри дня считаю интересным увидеть снятие трендовой ликвидности и достижение отметки начала fvg.
❤🔥9🔥4
Signed Sergei Almazoff
В текущее ситуации индикатор ATS бесполезен. Слишком много информации о наличии разворотных сетапов противоположных направлений.
❤8🔥2😢1
Signed Sergei Almazoff
Всем привет 👋 Третий день торгуемся в границах разворотного шортового сетапа ТФ 1W Ранее говорили что возможность рассматривать лонг исключена
👍12🔥1
Signed Sergei Almazoff
Длительность (продолжительность ) сделки это отдельная тема. Сидеть в приличном плюсе 9 дней , частично фиксировать прибыль и при этом понимать, что в любой момент остаток позиции может закрыться в ноль прибыли. Не просто это👆 И чем больше объем позиции тем сложнее. И вот кажется , что сложного? Это не мешки ворочать а просто ждать. Но, все эти 9 дней , того и смотри , а раз в 2-3 часа на позицию посмотришь чт…
👍17🔥2💯1
Signed Sergei Almazoff
2️⃣ Сигнал на сделку - это еще не торговая система Логика нового робота, над которым мы работаем последние 6-7 месяцев, значительно отличается от того, что мы использовали раньше. При этом почти за два года работы над алгоритмами у нас появилось множество отдельных инструментов. Их можно комбинировать, использовать в разных системах и адаптировать под разные монеты. Но здесь важно понимать главное. Торговый алг…
👍14❤🔥1
Signed Sergei Almazoff
У меня получилось так , но если вы без стопа , то могли заработать 🚀 Шутка , без стопа вы все сольете , вопрос времени
😁12👍6❤1👎1🔥1🤪1
Signed Sergei Almazoff
BTC отрастает. Смотрю последние оповещения от объемов по BTC : это 2 аномальные покупки📈 3 августа и сегодня Одну из них мы даже попробовали взять на небольшой объем
👍8😁2🔥1
Signed Sergei Almazoff
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @almazovtrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Almazov | Trading blog” (@almazovtrade), 1,949 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/almazovtrade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.