Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
14,300 average views per post against 17,766 subscribers — an engagement rate of 80.3%. Across the 17,631 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,614 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.77% and 18.1%, with a median of 9.23%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (24 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Posts measured
36 of 36 published in the window (0 exact, 36 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
513,830
Mature posts only
78.5% over 24 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +878. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,748–17,899 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 16:02
17,766
+23
17 Sept 2026, 05:58
17,743
+49
15 Sept 2026, 08:19
17,694
+5
13 Sept 2026, 16:22
17,689
+9
11 Sept 2026, 17:58
17,680
+13
9 Sept 2026, 03:37
17,667
+10
5 Sept 2026, 18:20
17,657
+27
3 Sept 2026, 16:37
17,630
+100
2 Sept 2026, 08:05
17,530
+19
1 Sept 2026, 07:58
17,511
+16
31 Aug 2026, 04:25
17,495
+50
30 Aug 2026, 02:23
17,445
+79
29 Aug 2026, 00:06
17,366
+259
28 Aug 2026, 00:14
17,107
+28
26 Aug 2026, 21:55
17,079
+6
25 Aug 2026, 23:02
17,073
+5
24 Aug 2026, 22:13
17,068
+29
23 Aug 2026, 07:44
17,039
+18
21 Aug 2026, 18:25
17,021
+18
20 Aug 2026, 12:48
17,003
first reading
Engagement
86 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
80.3%
avg views ÷ 17,766 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,300
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 86 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
86 (21 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
513,830
Reactions total
8,723
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 09m
Average length
4m 11s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,977 reactions across 83 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
6,069
30.4%
💯
5,379
26.9%
👍
4,910
24.6%
👏
1,055
5.28%
🥰
855
4.28%
custom 5382224089295365367
485
2.43%
🤗
458
2.29%
🎉
441
2.21%
🤝
325
1.63%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,471 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
76
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 86 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
29
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alogvinovOfficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 86 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ладно, раз уж у нас и MGS4 вышел, и 3 сентября - вспомним и это легендарное видео. Как я за пару лет до выхода финала главного блокбастера индустрии случайно лишил его главной-приглавной темы, на которую наяривало целое поколение, включая меня самого.
И тут надо понимать, что затевал я эт все не с этой целью совсем, а как фанат, обнаруживший фанфакт, и желавший удивить Кодзиму. Творческие люди часто заимствуют друг …
С Днем Рождения, величайшая. Игра, которая, безусловно, изменила вектор моего развития в данном мире. Ждем ремейк, как минимум, ну и сиквел, каким бы он ни был.
Да, забыл рассказать, перед Gamescom Owlcat показывали новое демо Expanse: Osiris Reborn и оно во всем было лучше первого показа - атмосфера густая, диалоги классные, экшен зубодробительный, разрушаемость богатая, экшен сетписы в роликах - мое почтение, видно, что стараются и получается и т.д.
Ну, и все на ганимеде, героини проникают под прикрытием на базу Протогена, и там пересекаются интересы сразу нескольких груп…
Активный мембер чатика и коллекционер Alex VDAS уже вовсю затестил цифривизацию физических дисков на примере своей Xbox коллекции. Тяжкий труд, конечно 😊
А вот и первая официальная имплементация #dlss5. Отвал бошки просто. Даже захотелось поиграть.
Единственная проблема с #DLSS5 это то, что он сейчас в руках людей, которые крутят радикально ползунки вправо для пущего эффекта в роликах. Это как с решейдами - единицы обладают хоть каким-то вкусом, чтобы достигнуть нужного результата. В руках профессионалов это очевидная бомба.
Спасибо чатик, и как мне теперь в обычный Zero Company играть? Пойду покупать БП и вкорячивать 4090. Объясните, кстати, кому нынче можно доверять из производителей? А то новый дивный китайский мир в магазинах какой-то. Смотрю на LIAN LI EDGE GOLD 1200W пока.
На удивление, с большим удовольствием, пробежал демо Onimusha: Way of the Sword. Как печально, что после всех одинаково говенных игр про мудака с мечом вышла наконец-таки нормальная и она, конечно, от Capcom.
Мне просто не хотелось ее даже запускать после всех этих игр. А внутри - отличная вообще боевка, которая эдакий самурайский слэшер, а не очередная соулс зевота, абсолютно вообще шикарные схватки с боссами с куч…
I’ve always asked for this. Кстати, вот вам некоторый инсайд по поводу утечки - это еще старая модель с кучей косяков. Она не учитывает корректно path tracing, и отбрасывает вообще массу информации, особенно в том, что касается исходного освещения, ломает местами свет, тени и материалы текстур. Что-то подобное было в первых версиях Ray Reconstruction.
У NVIDIA уже есть новая и она намного круче, учитывает path train…
Сегодня вышел #Breathedge2 - сиквел довольно успешного отечественного космического выживача (больше 500К копий). В новой игре гораздо больше сторителлинга, и вообще все наряднее. Ребят знаю и шлю им лучи поддержки.
Ну, а первым десяти успевшим истинным подписчикам на бусти (https://boosty.to/alogvinov) - ключи для Steam по такому случаю. Спасибо, что со мной. Скоро будут новости.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/…
👍109🔥38🎉10🥰5👏3💯1
Signed Anton L.
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @alogvinovOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@alogvinovOfficial edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Я оплатил Netflix, чтоб посмотреть премьеру GTAVI7%
У меня уже кинопаб оплачен13%
Youtube обойдусь84%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Макаренков об играх @makarenkoff_games · 28,589 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Игромания @igromania · 57,611 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Disgusting Men @disgustingmen · 21,757 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
Островская @DariaOstro · 31,423 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
StopGame.ru @stopgameru · 82,727 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
PlayStation | psprices.com @psprices_ru_ps4 · 65,548 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
hypewave @hypewave · 54,672 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
DTF @dtfbest · 57,722 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Кинопоиск | Игры @igrapoisk · 29,373 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
IXBT Games | Короче @ixbtgames · 68,371 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Nintendo | psprices.com @psprices_nintendo · 30,472 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Котокраб @Kotokrabs · 36,007 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
Игромир @Igromir_cloud · 58,836 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Коммандер @ilya_commander · 48,347 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Jeteed @jeteed · 204,216 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
MovieBlog 🎥 @themovieblogteam · 33,497 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Кроненберг нефильтрованный @Cronenberg1664 · 41,358 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Антон Логвинов. Мем. Ванга. Легенда. Игры и кино.” (@alogvinovOfficial), 17,766 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alogvinovOfficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
