Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ты лучшая с Аленой Финк

Channel

Ты лучшая с Аленой Финк

@alonafinkstyle

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

25,762subscribers

-80 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002362121936
TypeChannel
Username@alonafinkstyle
DescriptionЯ Алена, мне 45💛 Бывший байер KupiVIP и шопоголик— знаю, где искать лучшее ✂️ Тут про стиль, уход, тело и просто жизнь после 40🩷 Сотрудничество @Maru_Grait РКН https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6936798a5890f9d4c733542f 2bf19878-03bf-452d-a33e-f30806cc51ff
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alonafinkstyle

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,75725,90325,8307 August 2026 — 25,842 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,842 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,849 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,866 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,854 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,892 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,887 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,882 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,883 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,903 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,858 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,855 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,844 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,833 subscribers22 August 2026 — 25,863 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,839 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,817 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,868 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,885 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,894 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,886 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,872 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,867 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,882 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,876 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,845 subscribers4 September 2026 — 25,820 subscribers8 September 2026 — 25,768 subscribers11 September 2026 — 25,760 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,797 subscribers14 September 2026 — 25,757 subscribers16 September 2026 — 25,791 subscribers18 September 2026 — 25,762 subscribers25,7627 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -80. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,735–25,925 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 15:3625,762-29
16 Sept 2026, 05:5725,791+34
14 Sept 2026, 15:4025,757-40
13 Sept 2026, 03:0125,797+37
11 Sept 2026, 01:3625,760-8
8 Sept 2026, 00:2125,768-52
4 Sept 2026, 23:5625,820-25
3 Sept 2026, 05:5825,845-31
1 Sept 2026, 23:1525,876-6
1 Sept 2026, 01:0525,882+15
30 Aug 2026, 23:4625,867-5
30 Aug 2026, 00:5325,872-14
28 Aug 2026, 21:4725,886-8
27 Aug 2026, 20:4425,894+9
26 Aug 2026, 22:1325,885+17
26 Aug 2026, 01:2425,868+51
25 Aug 2026, 03:2425,817-22
23 Aug 2026, 18:5825,839-24
22 Aug 2026, 05:2525,863+30
20 Aug 2026, 19:3425,833first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.10%
avg views ÷ 25,762 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,570
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held55 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total25,137
Reactions total624
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,240
Videos
≈468
Links
≈643

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 32s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,089 reactions across 52 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤95345.6%
👍52525.1%
🔥31715.2%
🎉1557.42%
💯643.06%
😁200.957%
🥰100.479%
🤩90.431%
👏80.383%
🤔60.287%
🤣60.287%
❤‍🔥50.239%
👌40.191%
👎40.191%
🙉20.096%
🦄10.048%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,089 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 55 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alonafinkstyle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 19:15 UTC817 views33 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

А вот опять же, как можно носить обувь из подборки выше 👆🏻

❤23👍9🔥1

22 Sept 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,050 views19 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Пора потихоньку переходить на осеннюю обувь — у брендов как раз вышло много новых моделей 🥰 Собрала ботильоны, на которые точно стоит обратить внимание: 1. Ekonika 2. Befree 3. 12Storeez 4. Love Republic 5. Lime 6. 2MOOD 7. Graciana 8. Ekonika Какая пара вам больше нравится? У кого не грузится, все дублирую в MAX

🔥12❤6👎1

22 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,330 views50 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

А как у вас с этим?!🤣

😁20💯16❤8🤣6

21 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,500 views15 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Вот собрала образы чисто из подборки выше, чтобы было понятнее🔥

👍8❤7

21 Sept 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,560 views25 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Что купить мужчине на осень, чтобы выглядеть стильно и дорого? 🤎 Собрала 4 вещи, с которыми практически невозможно ошибиться: 🍂 Пальто 🍂 Брюки 🍂 Трикотаж / водолазки 🍂 Замшевые куртки Это та самая база, которая легко сочетается между собой и сразу делает мужской образ более собранным и интересным. Так что сохраняйте или сразу отправляйте своим мужчинам 😄 ПАЛЬТО 1. Пальто Marco Di Radi 2. Пальто HENDERSON 3. Паль…

❤14🔥8👍3

2 Sept 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,190 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Я всегда думала, что чем худее женщина, тем моложе она выглядит. А оказалось, всё может быть ровно наоборот 😳 А ещё мы поговорили про Оземпик, ботокс, косметологов, пластические операции и вообще про то, что на самом деле старит нас быстрее всего. И да, Сергей Свиридов местами говорил такие вещи, с которыми мне самой хотелось поспорить 😂 Поэтому разговор получился очень живой. Первый выпуск подкаста уже вышел ❤️ П…

❤23👍1

2 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC≈1,450 views47 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Как скрыть живот, но выглядеть женственно 🩵 Один из самых простых, но красивых способов 🥰

👍35❤8🤔4

1 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTC≈1,670 views68 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ну что, всех с первым сентября! ❤️ У кого дети в школу — поздравляю, мы снова официально живём от каникул до каникул 😂 А я вот наконец-то сфотографировалась на паспорт 😁 Причём в первом попавшемся месте. Захожу, там мужчина в возрасте, говорит мне: «Готовьтесь». Я даже растерялась. К чему? 😂 Я накрасилась, причесалась, пришла. Что ещё надо было сделать? Дыхательную гимнастику? Села. Щёлк. Показывает: «Как вам?» Я п…

👍42❤16💯8🙉2

31 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈2,210 views41 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Девочки, эти сумки были на всех модных показах, естественно, мне тоже сразу надо 😂 Увидела шоколадную Stella и просто влюбилась! Пока думала, её разобрали, еле успела отхватить свою. Ну посмотрите, какая она красивая ❤️ А пока ловила коричневую, заказала ещё и чёрную 😂 И она тоже просто огонь! У меня сумок BYNE шло уже целая коллекция, качество у них реально топ🔥

❤22🔥12👍7

30 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈2,050 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ну я не смогла устоять😂 Аттракцион невиданной щедрости на Love Republic на Ламоде 🫣

👍14❤7🔥3

30 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC≈2,040 views44 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Трендовые цвета осени 2026 🍂 Продолжаю тему осенних трендов. Собрала оттенки, которые особенно часто встречаются в новых коллекциях: 1. Бургунди 2. Сливочно-жёлтый 3. Электрический синий 4. Бирюзовый 5. Яркий красный 6. Сочный персиковый 7. Королевский фиолетовый И что интересно — всё это уже не только на подиумах. В новых коллекциях брендов таких оттенков действительно становится всё больше. Так что для обновлен…

❤34👍10

29 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈1,760 views46 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня наконец-то выгуляла своё платье Zarina, тем более повод появился. С утра решили всей семьёй поехать в океанариум на ВДНХ. Если честно, немного разочаровались. Людей очень много, рассмотреть что-то практически невозможно, да и сам океанариум оказался не таким большим, как мы ожидали. Примерно месяц назад были в океанариуме в Вегасе, и там нам понравилось намного больше. И экспозиция интереснее, и людей горазд…

❤28🔥10👍8

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @alonafinkstyle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTCAnonymous Poll278 voters

Что делать?

  1. Отращивать26%
  2. Резать74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ты лучшая с Аленой Финк” (@alonafinkstyle), 25,762 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alonafinkstyle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.