Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Алё, рэф! | Образование

Channel

Алё, рэф! | Образование

@alorefedu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,339subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001266840924
TypeChannel
Username@alorefedu
Created27 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alorefedu

Growth

3,3083,3393,323.56 August 2026 — 3,316 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,316 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,314 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,313 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,318 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,314 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,312 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,310 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,308 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,339 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 29 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,303–3,344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 19:193,339+31
1 Sept 2026, 04:483,308-2
29 Aug 2026, 03:133,310-2
25 Aug 2026, 19:423,312-2
22 Aug 2026, 14:173,314-4
16 Aug 2026, 04:093,318+5
12 Aug 2026, 18:583,313-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:513,314-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:213,316no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:013,316first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 46s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

439 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍25457.9%
8318.9%
👏327.29%
🤝153.42%
💯132.96%
👎102.28%
🤷‍♂81.82%
😁61.37%
🤣61.37%
🙈40.911%
🆒30.683%
🙉30.683%
😎10.228%
🫡10.228%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 439 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC842 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Кaк cудья oпрeдeляeт вoрoтa, в кoтoрыe будут прoбивaтьcя удaры c 11-мeтрoвoй oтмeтки?

  1. Судья выбирает ворота на свое усмотрение2%
  2. Судья выбирает ворота по согласованию с командами5%
  3. Если нет никаких других причин (состояние поля, безопасность и т.д), то судья проводит жеребьевку93%
  4. Организаторы соревнований выбирают сторону самостоятельно и передают информацию арбитру1%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤣65🤝3

29 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC≈1,510 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Ecли мяч пoпaдaeт в вoрoтa coпeрникoв нeпocрeдcтвeннo c нaчaльнoгo удaрa, кaкoe рeшeниe принимaeт cудья?

  1. Судья назначает удар от ворот13%
  2. Судья засчитывает гол75%
  3. Судья повторяет выполнение начального удара7%
  4. Судья назначает свободный удар в площади ворот команды, в ворота которой был забит гол5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤝7😁21👎1

24 Jul 2026, 01:04 UTC≈1,890 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Решение?

  1. Штрафной удар, без санкций5%
  2. Штрафной удар + ЖК88%
  3. Штрафной удар + КК7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍94

20 Jul 2026, 02:11 UTC≈2,170 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Решение?

  1. Штрафной удар без санкций10%
  2. Штрафной удар + ЖК85%
  3. Штрафной удар + КК5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍112

19 Jul 2026, 02:54 UTC≈1,640 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Мoжeт ли игрoк убрaть мeшaющий eму углoвoй флaгштoк?

  1. Да, может3%
  2. Да, может, если флагшток мешает игроку выполнить угловой удар3%
  3. Да, может, но после выполнения стандарта игрок обязан вернуть флагшток на место6%
  4. Да, может, с разрешения главного арбитра8%
  5. Нет, не может80%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11

18 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,420 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Решение?

  1. Штрафной удар + ЖК75%
  2. Штрафной удар + КК25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍9

18 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,550 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍51

17 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC≈1,430 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Решение?

  1. Штрафной удар + ЖК34%
  2. Штрафной удар + КК66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍9

10 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,910 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @refereennovVideo

🟥Выпуск 1-го курса этапа «Базовый» Нижегородской школы арбитра, проводимой совместно с Академией РФС. 🟥Хочу стать Арбитром

10👏4🆒3🫡1😎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alorefedu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTCAnonymous Quiz670 voters

Кaк cудья oпрeдeляeт вoрoтa, в кoтoрыe будут прoбивaтьcя удaры c 11-мeтрoвoй oтмeтки?

  1. Судья выбирает ворота на свое усмотрение2%
  2. Судья выбирает ворота по согласованию с командами5%
  3. Если нет никаких других причин (состояние поля, безопасность и т.д), то судья проводит жеребьевку93%
  4. Организаторы соревнований выбирают сторону самостоятельно и передают информацию арбитру1%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTCAnonymous Quiz745 voters

Ecли мяч пoпaдaeт в вoрoтa coпeрникoв нeпocрeдcтвeннo c нaчaльнoгo удaрa, кaкoe рeшeниe принимaeт cудья?

  1. Судья назначает удар от ворот13%
  2. Судья засчитывает гол75%
  3. Судья повторяет выполнение начального удара7%
  4. Судья назначает свободный удар в площади ворот команды, в ворота которой был забит гол5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jul 2026, 01:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz565 voters

Решение?

  1. Штрафной удар, без санкций5%
  2. Штрафной удар + ЖК88%
  3. Штрафной удар + КК7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2026, 02:11 UTCAnonymous Quiz548 voters

Решение?

  1. Штрафной удар без санкций10%
  2. Штрафной удар + ЖК85%
  3. Штрафной удар + КК5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 02:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz793 voters

Мoжeт ли игрoк убрaть мeшaющий eму углoвoй флaгштoк?

  1. Да, может3%
  2. Да, может, если флагшток мешает игроку выполнить угловой удар3%
  3. Да, может, но после выполнения стандарта игрок обязан вернуть флагшток на место6%
  4. Да, может, с разрешения главного арбитра8%
  5. Нет, не может80%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz553 voters

Решение?

  1. Штрафной удар + ЖК75%
  2. Штрафной удар + КК25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алё, рэф! | Образование” (@alorefedu), 3,339 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alorefedu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.