Channel
@alp6ha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
374subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001803392050 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alp6ha |
| Created | Between 1 September 2022 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alp6ha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 374 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 377 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 377 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 99 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
63 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 63.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 25.4% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 6.35% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alp6ha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
8 فیلم مورد توجه سال 2026 1. Project Hail Mary کارگردان: فیل لرد و کریستوفر میلر بازیگر اصلی: رایان گاسلینگ علمیتخیلی گرم، طنزآمیز و امیدوارکننده دربارهی یک معلم علوم که بهطور تصادفی مأمور نجات خورشید و زمین میشود. اقتباس از رمان محبوب اندی ویر. یکی از محبوبترین و تحسینشدهترین فیلمهای سال. 2.The Odyssey کارگردان: کریستوفر نولان بازیگر اصلی: مت دیمون اقتباس حماسی و باشکوه از داستان ادیسه هومر. فیلمی عظیم، پر…
❤1👍1
✍ در تحسین اُرسن ولز و همشهری کِین اگر امروز سینما را هنری میدانیم که میتواند با فرم، زمان، صدا و تصویر درباره ی ذهن و زندگی آدمها حرف بزند، بخش بزرگی از این نگاه را به اُرسن ولز بدهکاریم. ولز در ۲۵ سالگی همشهری کین را ساخت؛ زمانی که کارگردان های هالیوود معمولا آزادی زیادی برای اجرای ایده های شخصی نداشتند. اما ولز با روایتی چندلایه، عمق میدان، میزانسنی متفاوت، جایگاه تازه ای برای دوربین و استفاده ی خلاقانه از صدا، ق…
❤6❤🔥2
صخرههای عمودی سبز و خاکستری، آبدرههای عمیق تیره، صدای آبشارهای کوچیک که از لبهها میریزن و ابرهایی که شیرجه میزنی تو دلشون. انگار داری توی یه نقاشی زنده پرواز میکنی. اول که میپری تا سر استخون استرس داری. باد محکم میخوره تو صورتت، گوشات وزوز میکنه و حس میکنی داری واقعن میفتی پایین. چند ثانیه ی اول خیلی تند و وحشیه بعد وقتی بالهات پر از هوا میشه آروم تر میشی و انگار داری شنا میکنی تو هوا. قلبت تند میزنه ولی یه جور …
❤🔥6
پدر مونک مونستد (1859-1941) یکی از استادای بزرگ رئالیسم دانمارکیه. نقاشی هاش اونقدر دقیق و تمیز کار شدن که آدم اولش فکر میکنه داره عکس میبینه، نه نقاشی. چیزی که کارهاشو خاص میکنه، تسلطش روی نوره؛ مخصوصا تو صحنه های زمستونی و برفی. جنگل های برف گرفته، راه های خلوت و یه نور سرد و نرم که کل فضا رو تقریبا جادویی میکنه. مونستد فقط برف رو سفید نمیکرد؛ سایه ها، بازتاب نور و اون حس سکوت و آرامش زمستون رو هم کامل درمیاورد. ی…
❤4❤🔥1
دو بازیگری که در سال 2026 و در میان اتفاقات امسال از دنیا رفتند و خیلی از ما سینما دوستان شاید متوجه نشدیم (در حالیکه کمتر کسی هست که ازشون خاطره نداشته باشه) کاترین اوهارا و برندا فریکر بودند. گذشت زمان عجیبه. عکس هایی که زمانی فقط صحنههایی از یه فیلم بامزه ی کریسمسی بودند حالا تبدیل شدند به یادگاری از دو زنِ دوست داشتنی که دنیای هنر رو با گرمای وجودشون پر کردند. اونها رفتند اما هر سال که شبهای کریسمس فرا میرس…
❤8
دهه 90 میلادی ایتالیا حسابی تصادفهای شبونه مرگبار زیاد شده بود. جَوونایی که بعد از ساعتها رقص و مهمونی، خسته و بیخواب میرفتن پشت فرمون. تو همون فضا رابرت مایلز یه آهنگ ساخت که قرار بود آخر شب تو کلابها پخش شه؛ یه موزیک آروم و ملودیک که بچهها قبل اینکه سوار ماشین شن یه کم آروم بگیرن و با حال بهتر برن خونه. اسمش شد Children. آهنگی که سال 1995 اومد و خیلی زود از ایتالیا زد بیرون و شد یکی از موندگارترین کارهای ترنس و …
❤7👍2
برای اینکه به عمق اتمسفرش پی ببرید. @alp6ha
❤3🔥3
تصور کنید هنرمندی آهنگ های کلاسیک رو با موزیک روز ترکیب کنه و ازشون رمیکس های خفنی بسازه. این آهنگ هم با الهام از زمستان آنتونیو ویوالدی رمیکس شده و اثری متفاوت رو به وجود آورده 🔥🔥 من اولین باره که سلیقه ی موسیقیمو اینجا قرار میدم درسته به پای نارسیس نمیرسم اما میدونم خیلی از دوستان هم علاقه دارند به این سبک. برای اینکه با حال و هوای این موسیقی ارتباط بگیرید هندزفری یا هدفون میتونه به این کار کمک کنه. 🎶 Winte…
❤🔥7❤3
Posted without readable text
❤1
کاواسه هاسوئی که در سال 1883 در توکیو متولد شد، بهعنوان یکی از بزرگترین استادان جنبش هنری شینهانگای ژاپن شناخته میشود؛ جنبشی که در قرن بیستم هنر سنتی چاپ چوبی را دوباره زنده کرد. او پس از یادگیری نقاشی غربی و نقاشی سنتی ژاپنی زیر نظر کابوراکی کییـوکاتا، در سال 1914 همکاری خود را با ناشر واتانابه شوزابورو آغاز کرد؛ همکاریای که تأثیری ماندگار بر تاریخ هنر ژاپن گذاشت. هاسوئی که شیفته مناظر طبیعی بود، دههها با دفت…
❤7👍1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @alp6ha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ALP6HA” (@alp6ha), 374 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alp6ha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.