Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 25 days, net -2,109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109,537–112,278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Sept 2026, 03:15
109,853
-124
31 Aug 2026, 00:03
109,977
-65
29 Aug 2026, 21:23
110,042
-103
28 Aug 2026, 19:07
110,145
-83
27 Aug 2026, 20:54
110,228
-101
26 Aug 2026, 17:34
110,329
-86
25 Aug 2026, 18:17
110,415
-112
24 Aug 2026, 19:08
110,527
-162
23 Aug 2026, 04:36
110,689
-183
21 Aug 2026, 15:14
110,872
-80
20 Aug 2026, 15:05
110,952
-38
19 Aug 2026, 15:03
110,990
-101
18 Aug 2026, 14:43
111,091
-87
17 Aug 2026, 12:34
111,178
-134
16 Aug 2026, 01:54
111,312
-138
14 Aug 2026, 08:24
111,450
-91
12 Aug 2026, 22:26
111,541
-108
11 Aug 2026, 20:42
111,649
-104
10 Aug 2026, 19:18
111,753
-67
9 Aug 2026, 17:21
111,820
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 109,853 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,200
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.345%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
27 (3 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
109,478
Reactions total
378
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
139
Videos
46
Links
89
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 56s
Average length
59s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,369 reactions across 26 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
966
70.6%
👍
101
7.38%
❤🔥
54
3.94%
🔥
39
2.85%
🙏
25
1.83%
🤩
25
1.83%
👏
21
1.53%
🫡
19
1.39%
💋
18
1.31%
🥰
16
1.17%
😁
15
1.10%
💊
13
0.95%
🦄
11
0.804%
☃
10
0.73%
💯
10
0.73%
🎉
5
0.365%
🍾
4
0.292%
😎
4
0.292%
⚡
3
0.219%
🐳
3
0.219%
5 further kinds
7
0.511%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧲 It is 2 a.m., you are stuck on one step, and the group chat is asleep.
You do not need another PDF. You need someone to answer this question, now.
Create your own AI tutor inside Telegram in a minute — awake at any hour, never bored of your mistakes.
What it can do:
▫️ photograph the question — it walks you through it step by step, not just the answer
▫️ send a voice note and it explains back by voice
▫️ reads a…
⚠️ The account you log in with may get suspended over time. Please use a secondary mobile number that you do not plan to use in the future in PW. Do not use your primary or personal mobile number.
✅ We verify all accounts prior to saving. Rest assured, if you accidentally use an account with purchased batches, we will detect it and never save it to our database.
Dear batch uploaders !!
Don't login in pw mod apk or websites pw is sending this type of message and we don't know ban hoga ki nahi ....!!
But agar aap mai se kisi ne bhi apna batch kahi donate kia hai ya login Kia hai cahe sigma mai bhi ho to ...
Pw.live
Pw.live
mai login karlo isse aapka jo login hoga cahe koi app ya website ho waha se directly hat jaiga ....!!
How to donate your batch in sigma study app .....!! ❤️
Contribute us ....!! ❤️
If you want key for uploading your batch or face any problem while uploading them directly dm us @koderguru
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @alpha_study_squad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 234,013 of 1,629,419 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Team Nothing Official @Team_Nothing_Official · 2,743 (as read 14 August 2026)#17
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Physics Wallah - Alakh Pandey (Official) @Physics_Wallah_Official_Channel · 537,550 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
Unending Education @UnendingEducationOfficial · 52,932 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 24 August 2026
Science by Sunil Bhaiya @pw_chemistry_class_9_and_10 · 116,327 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 14 August 2026
SSB/ Polity/ History / Economics by Prathmesh Sir @prathmeshsir_defencewallah · 61,418 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 22 August 2026
Geography by Rahul Sir @rahulsir_defencewallah · 64,740 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 21 August 2026
NEET/JEE FREE BATCHES @NEET_JEE_FREE_BATCH_LECTURES · 81,368 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 19 August 2026
Exphub 9th & 10th @exphub910 · 793,639 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 11 August 2026
Manish raj mr sir @mrphysicss · 473,659 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 11 August 2026
Defence Wallah @pwdefencewallah · 134,298 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 13 August 2026
Team - DSR💥 @club_digrajsinghrajput · 764,267 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 11 August 2026
PW Foundation Wallah @foundationwallah · 172,391 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
IIT JEE Mains 2027 Notes @JEE_2027_MATERIAL · 56,115 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 23 August 2026
PW Udaan Class 10 @pwudaanclass10th · 101,627 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 15 August 2026
Sourabh Raina @Sourabhrainaofficial · 73,884 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 19 August 2026
GATE Wallah CS & DA @Gwcomsciandinfo · 72,052 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 20 August 2026
PadhleAkshay @padhleakshay · 120,571 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 14 August 2026
Kriti Champions OP @kritichampions · 189,977 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 11 August 2026
PW Arjuna JEE- Class 11 @pw_jeearjuna · 71,543 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 20 August 2026
Taniya Sharma English Official @TaniyaSharmaEnglishOfficial · 69,181 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
NEET Wallah @neetwallahpw · 357,451 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 11 August 2026
NEET Ki Duniya @pw_yakeendropper · 176,964 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
Air JEE - NEET @AirJEENEET · 91,956 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 16 August 2026
Science and Fun 9th 10th 11th 12th @scienceandfun9th10th11th12th · 139,075 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 August 2026
Magnet Brains Official @magnetbrainsbhopal · 52,833 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ALPHA STUDY SQUAD” (@alpha_study_squad), 109,853 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alpha_study_squad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.