Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for علوم الحديث وحجية السنة

Channel

علوم الحديث وحجية السنة

@alsayed_hadeeth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,012subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001055852177
TypeChannel
Username@alsayed_hadeeth
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alsayed_hadeeth

Growth

4,0124,0334,022.57 August 2026 — 4,030 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,030 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,031 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,033 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,032 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,028 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,020 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,018 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,019 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,014 subscribers6 September 2026 — 4,012 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,009–4,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 16:014,012-2
2 Sept 2026, 09:484,014-5
30 Aug 2026, 12:284,019+1
27 Aug 2026, 20:374,018-2
25 Aug 2026, 01:524,020-8
21 Aug 2026, 04:544,028-4
17 Aug 2026, 18:144,032-1
14 Aug 2026, 20:044,033+2
11 Aug 2026, 09:034,031+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:474,030no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:364,030first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 November 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 41s
Average length
6m 21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

539 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35265.3%
👍14526.9%
👏91.67%
🥰71.30%
🤔50.928%
❤‍🔥40.742%
🐳40.742%
🔥30.557%
😢30.557%
👌20.371%
💯20.371%
👎10.186%
😁10.186%
🤩10.186%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 539 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2022 to 19 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jan 2026, 11:14 UTC≈1,660 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @khawatir_alsayedPhoto

صحيح..

38👍2👎1😁1

9 Dec 2023, 14:17 UTC≈8,270 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026

كلام لطيف دقيق لابن دقيق العيد في إفادة حديث الآحاد : " قد أكثر الأصوليون من حكاية إفادته القطع عن الظاهرية أو بعضهم ، وتعجب الفقهاء وغيرهم منهم !! ، لأنا نراجع أنفسنا فنجد خبر الواحد محتملاً للكذب والغلط ، ولا قطع مع هذا الاحتمال ، لكن مذهبهم له مستند لم يتعرض له الأكثرون وهو أن يقال : ما صح من الإخبار فهو مقطوع بصحته لا من جهة كونه خبر الواحد … وإنما وجب أن يقطع بصحته لامر خارج عن هذه الجهة ، وهو أن الشريعة محفوظ

26👍14🔥3🤔2

6 Dec 2023, 18:30 UTC≈6,160 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قال ابن حزم في "الإحكام" (5/89) : "أما الصحابة رضي الله عنهم فهو كل من جالس النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ولو ساعة ، وسمع منه ولو كلمة فما فوقها ، أو شاهد منه عليه السلام أمرا يعيه ، ولم يكن من المنافقين الذين اتصل نفاقهم واشتهر ، حتى ماتوا على ذلك ... "

21👍1

4 Nov 2023, 16:07 UTC≈6,100 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قال ابن حزم - رحمه الله " إن القرآن والحديث الصحيح متفقان ، هما شيء واحد لا تعارض بينهما ولا اختلاف ، يوفق الله لفهم ذلك من شاء من عباده ، ويحرمه من شاء ، لا إله إلا هو " كتاب 📕 " الإحكام في أصول الأحكام "

30👍7

16 Sept 2023, 11:51 UTC≈6,410 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قال حماد بن زيد لبقية بن الوليد لما ذاكره بأحاديث " ما أجود أحاديثك لو كان لها أجنحة " يعني أسانيد . #الإسناد_من_الدين #أهمية_الإسناد

18👍5

9 Sept 2023, 11:56 UTC≈6,350 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

المَظَلَّات المنهجية ! #منهجيات #حجية_السنة

7👍2

9 Sept 2023, 11:54 UTC≈5,360 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

" إن ثبوت حجية السنة المطهرة واستقلالها بتشريع الأحكام ضرورة دينية ، ولا يخالف في ذلك إلا من لا حظ له في الإسلام " إرشاد الفحول للشوكاني 📚

8👍2👏1

4 Sept 2023, 11:12 UTC≈5,330 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

يقول الإمام ابن حزم في كتابه " الفصل في المِلل والأهواء " " نقل الثقة مع الاتصال حتى يبلغ النبي ﷺ خصَّ الله به المسلمين دون سائر أهل المِلل كلها ، وأبقاه عندهم غضّاً جديداً على قديم الدهور "

19👍5❤‍🔥4💯1

15 Mar 2023, 21:12 UTC≈6,590 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

يقول الدكتور همام سعيد: "وبذلك يتبين لنا أن منهج المحدثين هو منهج قرآني مستمد من القرآن والسنة، وأنه منهج تاريخي نقدي ، أي أنه منهج لا يسلِّم بالنص دون محاكمة ونقد، ولا يكفي أن يصدر النص عن عالم أو شخص له احترامه حتى يقبل ، بل لا بد أن تثبت نسبة النص إلى قائله ، وأن ينظر فيه نظرة ثاقبة فاحصة لمعرفة اتفاقه مع الأسس الثابتة والمبادئ العامة…..، والحق الذي لا مرية فيه أن منهجية المحدثين منهجية قرآنية ، وأنها مظهر من مظا

11👍9

8 Mar 2023, 21:21 UTC≈5,730 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

الميزان الاكبر عند أهل السنة والأثر قال سفيان بن عيينة رحمه الله:‌‌ " إن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم هو‌‌ الميزان الأكبر، فعليه تعرض الأشياء، على خلقه وسيرته وهديه، فما وافقها فهو الحق، وما خالفها فهو الباطل ". الجامع للخطيب.

25👍12

28 Feb 2023, 19:42 UTC≈5,430 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قال شعبة بن الحجاج عن نفسه : (ما رويت عن رجل حديثاً واحداً ، إلا أتيته أكثر من مرة ، والذي رويت عنه عشرة أحاديث أتيته أكثر من عشر مرات ، والذي رويت عنه خمسين حديثاً أتيته أكثر من خمسين مرة ، والذي رويت عنه مائة حديث أتيته أكثر من مائة مرة) وبهذه الطريقة يكتشفون مدى قوة حفظ الراوي في أوقات وأزمان مختلفة

24👍8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alsayed_hadeeth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“علوم الحديث وحجية السنة” (@alsayed_hadeeth), 4,012 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alsayed_hadeeth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.