Старый оштукатуренный фасад смотрелся так себе, если честно. Не солидно. Но ситуация исправима. И исправлена. С помощью фасадных панелей «Кирпич жженый». Теперь совсем другое дело!
👍1🔥1

Channel
@alta_profil_ru
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,401subscribers
+249 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001778709479 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alta_profil_ru |
| Description | «Альта-Профиль» – первый отечественный производитель качественного сайдинга. ———————- Поддержка пользователей компании АЛЬТА-ПРОФИЛЬ. Помощь покупателям. Выбор. Точки продаж. Оформление заказа. @AltaProfilBot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alta_profil_ru |
Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:28 | 6,401 | -15 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:19 | 6,416 | -28 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:29 | 6,444 | +56 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 6,388 | +100 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:41 | 6,288 | +29 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:39 | 6,259 | -15 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:06 | 6,274 | -14 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:27 | 6,288 | -22 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 10:18 | 6,310 | -24 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 6,334 | +204 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 6,130 | -53 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 6,183 | -17 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 6,200 | -27 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 6,227 | -23 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:04 | 6,250 | +33 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 6,217 | +159 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 6,058 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 6,056 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 6,069 | -21 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 6,090 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (25 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 6,067 |
| Reactions total | 174 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 11:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
572 reactions across 27 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 304 | 53.1% | |
| ❤ | 254 | 44.4% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 1.57% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.175% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.175% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.175% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 572 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Старый оштукатуренный фасад смотрелся так себе, если честно. Не солидно. Но ситуация исправима. И исправлена. С помощью фасадных панелей «Кирпич жженый». Теперь совсем другое дело!
👍1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
Когда-то стены дворцов и богатых особняков украшали шелком, бархатом и гобеленами. Текстиль создавал особую атмосферу: делал интерьеры уютнее, добавлял им глубины и благородства. Сегодня этот прием снова актуален. Только вместо настоящей ткани можно использовать практичные стеновые панели SPC! В коллекции “Тканевая роскошь” от “Альта Слэб” восемь дизайнов, вдохновленных фактурами текстиля. Гладкий атлас, нежный бат…
Photo, posted without a caption
Строительный сезон в большинстве регионов страны подошел к концу. Если вы не успели выполнить облицовку, остается только законсервировать дом – и ждать потепления. Или нет? Есть альтернативное решение. Обшить дом сайдингом или фасадными панелями – они монтируются сухим методом, при помощи саморезов, без использования растворов. Поэтому процесс можно не прекращать даже в морозы. Но есть несколько важных нюансов. 1…
👍2
Можно ли быть уверенным, что выбранные панели будут к лицу вашему дому? Да, если вы выбрали «Кирпич клинкерный» белого цвета. Он к лицу любому дому – большому или маленькому, с простой или сложной архитектурой. А чтобы здание выглядело выразительно и дорого, используйте контрастное сочетание белого и темного кирпича. Только посмотрите, как такое решение преображает здание!
💯1
Почему важно покупать панели «Альта-Профиль» из одной партии? Фасадные панели повторяют цвет, форму, игру оттенков натурального камня или кирпича. Чтобы добиться такого сходства, их окрашивают по сложной технологии многослойного нанесения краски. Последний слой – с помощью системы пульверизаторов, приближенной к ручному окрашиванию. Вот почему в разных партиях оттенки могут немного отличаться. И есть риск, что ваш …
👍1
Каркасные технологии – один из самых быстрых и доступных способов построить собственный дом. Здания получаются теплые, уютные и долговечные. Если, конечно, защитить стены от непогоды надежным фасадом. В идеале – таким, который тоже быстро возводится и не стоит дороже самого дома. Например, фасадные панели «Каньон» – как на фото. Они не только защищают стены, но и придают зданию уверенный вид. —————————————— Не заб…
👍2
Ригельная кладка узнается сразу. Среди десятков вариантов кирпичной кладки она, пожалуй, самая выразительная: не похожая на обычный кирпич, объемная и эффектная. Мимо такого фасада сложно пройти. Коллекция “Ригель немецкий” – это шесть цветов в теплой и глубокой гамме, от мягкого бежевого до богатого шоколадного. Важно: из-за особенностей конструкции правила монтажа для этих панелей немного отличаются. Например, па…
❤1
Деревянный дом теплый, уютный, любимый. Но с годами стал темным, холодным, уставшим… На этой стадии ему нужна поддержка. Например, фасад из светлого сайдинга – такой же уютный, только свежий и нарядный. И практическая сторона тоже радует: теперь фасад не нужно регулярно красить и обрабатывать пропитками для защиты. Он и так ничего не боится!
❤2👍1
В чем же на самом деле отличия? Обе системы производятся из ПВХ. Обе без декоративных излишеств. Обе могут быть белыми или не белыми. Но цветовая гамма серии «Элит», правда, чуть шире: кроме белого и коричневого (как у серии «Стандарт»), есть графитовый цвет. Но основное отличие не в этом, а в проходимости. У серии «Элит» больше диаметр желобов и труб, а сами желоба усилены ребрами жесткости, которые защищают систе…
❤1
Чем серия «Элит» отличается от серии «Стандарт»?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍24❤15
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @alta_profil_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чем серия «Элит» отличается от серии «Стандарт»?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Есть у нас тут специалисты? А подскажите, мастер все сделал правильно?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Альта-Профиль: безупречный стиль Вашего дома!” (@alta_profil_ru), 6,401 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alta_profil_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.