Channel
@although
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,170subscribers
+215 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003900462208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @although @larploungemain |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 2 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/although |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 1,170 | +7 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 1,163 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 1,161 | +51 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 1,110 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 1,107 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 1,102 | +21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 1,081 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 1,083 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 1,080 | +18 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 1,062 | +9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 1,053 | -353 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 1,406 | -629 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 2,035 | +985 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 1,050 | -517 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 1,567 | +602 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 965 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 964 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 955 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @although. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚨 JUST IN: A new exploit has surfaced that can cause iOS devices to crash in any chat where the payload is sent. ⚠️ Attention all group owners: We highly recommend adding the exploit to your blacklisted words or enabling your anti-spam/anti-exploit filters as soon as possible to help protect your members. For updates and more information: 📢 @although / @larplounge
⚠️JUST IN The @police Telegram username has just been sold in a bidding war on Fragment for 66,666 TON ($91,811 USD).
⚠️JUST IN: An attacker stole $500K and immediately lost $370K. After draining a victim’s wallet for $500K, the attacker swapped the stolen funds using maximum slippage and accidentally paid over $370K in fees, receiving just 67 ETH ($130K). 📱 Join @Although
⚠️ THE TRUTH ABOUT “NO-KYC” CRYPTO CARDS “No KYC” doesn’t necessarily mean no data collection. Even if you don’t submit ID to the platform, your issuer, payment processor, card network, merchants—and your on-chain activity—can still leave a trail. Many no-KYC cards also come with trade-offs: lower spending limits, higher fees, limited support, and fewer protections if something goes wrong. They’re interesting to …
POV: > You’re 55 yo > Worked your whole life > Built a decent portfolio at 40 > Kept it growing > Made the right moves and investments in crypto > have a beautiful family now > son is almost ready to go college >calm saturday evening u receive a call from coinbase support >the support guy said all the right things >you now believe your account is secure > calm sunday morning > you sip coffee and open your phone to c…
chat what do we think
Photo, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
🚨 UPDATE: COLDCARD LOSSES NOW PAST $100M It started at $38M. Then $70M. Then $88.6M. Galaxy Research now confirms 1,596 BTC stolen from ~7,300 addresses - and with the suspected fourth wave, the real number is closer to 2,055 BTC (~$130M). Would you still trust a hardware wallet after this? 😀@although
Stay tuned
camshow in 2h in @larplounge
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @although. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“L.A.R.P” (@although), 1,170 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/although.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.