7 measurements spanning 30 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 543–588 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 02:38
583
+15
1 Sept 2026, 07:37
568
-4
25 Aug 2026, 05:43
572
-1
19 Aug 2026, 01:43
573
+22
12 Aug 2026, 10:59
551
+3
11 Aug 2026, 21:30
548
no change
11 Aug 2026, 21:19
548
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
38s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
225 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5269403836824440052
37
16.4%
custom 5303310030940952439
35
15.6%
🙏
26
11.6%
🥰
17
7.56%
custom 5249211194111184130
16
7.11%
custom 5300779290181262152
15
6.67%
💔
15
6.67%
💅
13
5.78%
🔥
11
4.89%
custom 5334812855847901773
8
3.56%
💘
8
3.56%
🌚
7
3.11%
😭
6
2.67%
custom 5217658530403733500
3
1.33%
😇
2
0.889%
😨
2
0.889%
🤗
2
0.889%
custom 5231101979903675433
1
0.444%
⚡
1
0.444%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 225 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alyonabrand. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Как соцсети могут довести до депрессии
Казалось бы, ну что такого? сидим в соцсетях, никого не трогаем)
Но наш мозг эволюционно устроен на бесконечный поиск еды и информации
😳Еда = выживание
😳Информация об окружающей среде = безопасность
Проблема в том, что эволюция не предусмотрела TikTok, Instagram и бесконечную ленту, где информация давно стала развлечением.
Аарон Бек описывал депрессивную триаду так:
⚠️Я пло…
Большинство людей думают, что результат психотерапии зависит от метода.
Но исследования Майкла Ламберта показали неожиданную картину.
🟣 40% — жизненные обстоятельства и ресурсы человека.
🟢 30% — качество отношений между клиентом и терапевтом.
🟠 15% — ожидания клиента и эффект плацебо.
🔵 И только 15% — конкретный метод терапии.
Поэтому вопрос не только в том, какой подход использует психолог. Не менее важно, чувств…
Развелась➡️виновата во всём
После моего поста про развод в комментариях случилось удивительное открытие
Оказывается, в браке за всё отвечает женщина.
То есть мужчина в этой истории как будто декоративный элемент интерьера... удобно конечно)
Меня всегда забавляет эта уверенность незнакомых людей, что они лучше знают, почему распался чужой брак. Причём версия почти всегда одна - баба виновата
Никому даже в голову …
Пришло время рассказать то, о чём я долго молчала.
В Инстаграме я уже начала свой рассказ, пришла пора текстового формата.
После 30 лет брака мы с мужем разводимся.
Писать это непросто. Не потому, что я сомневаюсь в своём решении. А потому, что за этими словами стоит огромная часть моей жизни.
✅Я не собираюсь превращать свой канал в хронику развода.
Но я понимаю, что сейчас проживаю очень важный этап. И, возможн…
ХОЧЕШЬ НЕ ЧУВСТВОВАТЬ БОЛЬ? 🙏⤵️
Мозг не может отключить боль, не затронув удовольствие.
Учёные доказали:
системы боли и удовольствия, привязанности и радости тесно связаны.
При хронической боли люди перестают получать удовольствие от жизни. Нарушается работа системы, отвечающей за страдание и награду.
Мозг не может просто нажать кнопку 🫵
не чувствовать боль
Потому что рядом находится кнопка 🫵
чувствовать жизнь
…
Создатель схема-терапии Джеффри Янг говорил про картину Мунка «Крик» , что именно так выглядит наш травмированный внутренний ребенок.
Ребенок, которому было слишком страшно, слишком больно или слишком одиноко.
К сожалению этот крик продолжает жить внутри нас, даже когда мы давно выросли 🫂
🏆Испания 🇪🇸 или Аргентина 🇦🇷
Сегодня основная повесточка у футбольных болельщиков , кто из них сильнее
Но знаете, за кого мы на самом деле болеем?😏
За свою привязанность.
Мы цепляемся не за команду, а за чувство принадлежности, воспоминания, семейные традиции, любимого игрока или желание быть «на стороне победителя».
Поэтому поражение иногда переживается как личная потеря, а победа — как собственный триумф.
Футб…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alyonabrand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“психология с Алёной” (@alyonabrand), 583 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alyonabrand.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
