Channel
@alyonainventio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003799010250 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alyonainventio |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alyonainventio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 66 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 65 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 61 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 61 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 65.2% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 13.0% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Михаил Юрьевич Лермонтов, "Военно-Грузинская дорога близ Мцхеты (Кавказский вид с саклей)". 1837. И скучно и грустно, и некому руку подать В минуту душевной невзгоды... Желанья!.. что пользы напрасно и вечно желать?.. А годы проходят - все лучшие годы! Любить... но кого же?.. на время - не стоит труда, А вечно любить невозможно. В себя ли заглянешь? - там прошлого нет и следа: И радость, и муки, и всё там ничтожно..…
❤3
Нет, сей офицер (отдельная тема, конечно) не отпускает. То сравнит девушку с козой, то с лошадью. Почему люди этому персонажу сочувствуют и жалеют; я бы даже больше сказала - любят? Не потому ли, что школа поклеила всем ярлыки, и теперь нельзя думать по-другому?.. Вот Михаил Афанасьевич как-то более проницателен что ли. - Не хотите ли подбавить рому? - сказал я своему собеседнику, - у меня есть белый из Тифлиса; тепе…
"Почему демократы не любят котов, догадаться нетрудно. Кот красив; он наводит на мысли о роскоши, чистоте, неге и т. д..." © Шарль Бодлер, "Фейрверки". Сегодня Всемирный день котов.🐈⬛🎉
👍2
Алан Кобер, "Человек, который уничтожил телевидение". Аллюзия на Рэя Брэдбери. 1979.
👍2👀1
Фишка в том, что Одиссей всё же мог ещё заткнуть уши, велев привязать себя к мачте, - и они с командой смогли-таки вернуться домой. Мы же volens nolens не можем: сирены в этом маркетинговом мире капитализма повсюду - даже в Пятёрочке. Здесь и возникает ситуация разрыва. Zeitgeist as is.
👍1💯1
- Какая у тебя машина? - X3. - Ты что, не знаешь название своего автомобиля?!!! - BMW X3. #диссоциации
👍2
Хироки Каванаби (かわなべひろき), "Ливень". 2024.
👍3
💔
👍1😎1
Video message, posted without a caption
👍1
Зураб Соткилава⚽️💜 1998. Перекладные из Тифлиса никогда не отпустят: отражение следов сильнее их самих. #футбол #бесценно
👍1🤷♂1
Терпение, спокойствие, сейчас они появятся, Только за плитою в людях воля закаляется. В яичнице что главное - дать вовремя по яйцам, Тогда ваши яйца хорошо приготовляются. А яйца в семье должны быть под рукой, Яйца, они в дом несут сытость и покой. Ты можешь хлеб не есть, но яйца обязательно, Яйца ведь сытны, полезны и питательны. Яйца богаты живительным белком, И если жарить яйца, то лучше с молоком. Яйца надо жарит…
👍2😁1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @alyonainventio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В диссонансе с Бартлби” (@alyonainventio), 66 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alyonainventio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.