Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شبكة شرطاوية

Channel

شبكة شرطاوية

@am18k

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

661subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 1 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001508242760
TypeChannel
Username@am18k
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 October 2026
Last confirmed live21 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/am18k

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6616676641 October 2026 — 667 subscribers1 October 2026 — 667 subscribers6 October 2026 — 663 subscribers14 October 2026 — 662 subscribers21 October 2026 — 661 subscribers1 October 202621 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 20 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 660–668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Oct 2026, 16:19661-1
14 Oct 2026, 06:56662-1
6 Oct 2026, 20:55663-4
1 Oct 2026, 23:22667no change
1 Oct 2026, 22:47667first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 54s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2779.4%
💔38.82%
😁38.82%
🤯12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 28 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 May 2026, 23:27 UTC551 views7 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Video

قيثارتي 💚🫂

❤7

Signed 𓆩حـمــودي𓆪

31 Mar 2026, 11:41 UTC777 views1 reactionsread 1 October 2026

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZG98BwBVKdQh7-Ikb1K/

❤1

Signed 𓆩حـمــودي𓆪

17 Mar 2026, 00:25 UTC896 views3 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁3

Signed 𓆩حـمــودي𓆪

16 Mar 2026, 23:56 UTC767 viewsread 1 October 2026

العندة ستوري قوي يسويلي تاك هاذا اليوزر مالتي am.18.k

Signed 𓆩حـمــودي𓆪

16 Mar 2026, 23:56 UTC753 viewsread 1 October 2026

تعالو اهنا خل نضحك على الطلبة سولي تاك واردة خل نسويهم تصنيف بالستوريات🤣🤣

Signed 𓆩حـمــودي𓆪

16 Mar 2026, 23:55 UTC695 viewsread 1 October 2026

https://www.instagram.com/stories/am.18.k/3854434823280174304?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igsh=MWh0ZjRoYTIxamVxbw==

Signed 𓆩حـمــودي𓆪

2 Feb 2026, 10:49 UTC837 viewsread 1 October 2026

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGdmnQP9y/

Signed 𓆩حـمــودي𓆪

11 Jan 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 1 October 2026

صوتو لأحمد فرحان

Signed 𓆩حـمــودي𓆪

11 Jan 2026, 11:31 UTC965 views2 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @iraqstarsleagueofficialPoll

من يستحق لقب الأفضل في الجولة الحادية عشرة ؟

  1. احمد فرحان - الشرطة33%
  2. هيثم الجويني - القوة الجوية25%
  3. كلاوديو مارادونا - نوروز43%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤2

Signed 𓆩حـمــودي𓆪

6 Nov 2025, 16:21 UTC≈1,170 views5 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @alshorta_scPhoto

أبناء الزعيم.. في خدمة قميص الوطن 🇮🇶💚

❤5

4 Oct 2025, 08:47 UTC≈1,050 views4 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @alshorta_scPhoto

يوم المباراة❗️ الكهرباء 🆚 الشرطة 🏟️| ملعب الزوراء 🕣| الساعة الثامنة والنصف مساءً #دوري_نجوم_العراق #زعيم_العراق_الحقيقي

❤4

16 Sept 2025, 06:22 UTC965 views2 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤2

Signed طـيف💎.

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @am18k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Jan 2026, 11:31 UTCAnonymous Poll6,830 voters approx.

من يستحق لقب الأفضل في الجولة الحادية عشرة ؟

  1. احمد فرحان - الشرطة33%
  2. هيثم الجويني - القوة الجوية25%
  3. كلاوديو مارادونا - نوروز43%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 28 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

المشهد
@agent313 · 19,198
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شبكة شرطاوية” (@am18k), 661 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/am18k.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.