Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aman khedia - Your Maths Buddy

Channel

Aman khedia - Your Maths Buddy

@amankhedia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,340subscribers

+54 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001312668537
TypeChannel
Username@amankhedia
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held49
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/amankhedia

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,28411,56511,424.519 August 2026 — 11,286 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,284 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,285 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,288 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,313 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,368 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,386 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,415 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,425 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,426 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,425 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,423 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,413 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,412 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,408 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,396 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,565 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,533 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,511 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,501 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,485 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,469 subscribers25 September 2026 — 11,507 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,530 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,497 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,499 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,493 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,496 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,492 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,488 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,484 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,486 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,484 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,478 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,473 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,460 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,458 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,455 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,446 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,438 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,442 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,437 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,427 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,423 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,418 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,416 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,408 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,400 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,340 subscribers11,34019 August 20267 November 2026
49 measurements spanning 80 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,242–11,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 13:0511,340-60
6 Nov 2026, 14:3711,400-8
5 Nov 2026, 14:3111,408-8
4 Nov 2026, 13:5111,416-2
3 Nov 2026, 14:1011,418-5
2 Nov 2026, 16:4611,423-4
1 Nov 2026, 16:2711,427-10
31 Oct 2026, 16:5811,437-5
30 Oct 2026, 14:1811,442+4
29 Oct 2026, 12:0811,438-8
28 Oct 2026, 10:2011,446-9
27 Oct 2026, 08:3511,455-3
26 Oct 2026, 08:1111,458-2
25 Oct 2026, 05:2511,460-13
24 Oct 2026, 02:5711,473-5
22 Oct 2026, 23:4611,478-6
21 Oct 2026, 18:5011,484-2
20 Oct 2026, 11:3111,486+2
19 Oct 2026, 09:1811,484-4
18 Oct 2026, 12:2711,488first reading

Engagement

69 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 11,340 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.202%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 69 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held69 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total17,357
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 08:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,126 reactions across 63 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤74766.3%
👍16614.7%
😢655.77%
😭403.55%
🔥302.66%
🙏211.87%
❤‍🔥121.07%
😐100.888%
🎉90.799%
🥰60.533%
🫡50.444%
💯40.355%
🌚30.266%
🕊30.266%
👌20.178%
👀10.089%
👏10.089%
🤔10.089%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,126 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 08:15 UTC26 viewsread 7 November 2026

Hi Students! ❤️ Just 15 minutes to go! ⏳ We’ll be LIVE shortly. Make sure you join on time. Let’s come together, discuss your CA Foundation January 2027 preparation strategy, and take the first step towards a stronger comeback! Waiting to see you all LIVE! 🚀 Register Now: https://akclasses.in/webinars/guidance-webinar

7 Nov 2026, 07:47 UTC147 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Don't let one setback decide your next result. ❤️ It's time to reset, refocus and come back stronger! I am here with an AI-Powered 45-Day Personalised Study Planner to help you structure your preparation, overcome challenges and make every day count. Watch the video and start planning your comeback today! 💪 Your next 45 days matter. Make them count! 🎥 https://youtu.be/28s3ak8Ubnc

❤1

7 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC264 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

I know September didn’t go as planned for many of you, but remember, one result doesn’t define your potential. I’m looking forward to meeting each one of you LIVE in today’s webinar. Let’s talk, understand where things went wrong, and most importantly, plan how we can make January 2027 your success story. See you all today! Let’s bounce back stronger! 💪 Register Now: https://akclasses.in/webinars/guidance-webinar

6 Nov 2026, 16:54 UTC690 viewsread 7 November 2026

Dear Students, It’s time to shift gears and start your focused preparation for the CA Foundation January 2027 examination. Don’t wait for the last moment! Start early, stay consistent, and focus on exam-oriented preparation. Remember, the right strategy at the right time makes all the difference. Let’s begin the journey towards success together! 💯 Watch full video- https://youtu.be/sxuLfPQRS74?si=tVu6snqAff-RTAP5

6 Nov 2026, 07:43 UTC≈1,030 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026

🎉 *CA Foundation September 2026 Results!* 🎉 Dear Students, 🏆 *Congratulations to everyone who has cleared!* Please share your marks and upload your photograph so we can celebrate your success and send you a token of appreciation! ❤️ 🤝 *Haven’t cleared this time? Please share your result too.* We’ll conduct a *webinar* to figure out together what went wrong and how to prepare better for *January 2027.* I’m here for…

❤7

6 Nov 2026, 06:56 UTC≈1,100 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Hi dosto! I know a result that didn't go as expected can feel disappointing, but remember, this is not the end of your journey. ❤️ One setback doesn't define your potential. Keep believing in yourself, and don't give up! Watch this, I've got something to tell you. https://youtu.be/n52xzO7X5yg -Your Maths Buddy!

❤1

5 Nov 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,310 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Hi students! 🌟 See you all LIVE today at 9 PM! Just one hour to go. Let’s come together, stay positive, and manifest the best results! ✨💯 https://youtube.com/live/lplHZrTmeKg?feature=share

❤2

5 Nov 2026, 11:48 UTC≈1,350 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026

See you today live at 9 PM https://www.youtube.com/live/lplHZrTmeKg?si=joNeVZpU9AH0843K

❤2👍1

1 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC≈2,170 views0 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Finallyy the official announcement is out for sept 2026 results https://youtube.com/shorts/Ox0kXOKBJjY?si=_GilqT9Vk1L21RGc

31 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC≈2,230 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Lets start the Prep for Jan 2027 See you tomorrow at 9 AM https://youtube.com/live/3AHT9KczgHo?feature=share

❤3

25 Oct 2026, 05:11 UTC≈3,520 views12 reactionsread 7 November 2026

CA Foundation Sept 2026 Result Date is Out!?😱 https://youtu.be/Mh2ynAeuUQ4

🙏7🔥4❤1

24 Oct 2026, 17:57 UTC≈3,520 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

*CA Foundation Result Awaited?* *Confused about what’s next?* Join Your CA Buddy – CA Shubham Singhal for *Last webinar!* 🗓️ *26th Oct | 🕥 8:00 PM* *Enroll Now* https://www.shubhamsinghal.com/product/done-with-ca-foundation

❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @amankhedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTCAnonymous Poll1,390 voters approx.

Bachho, How was the Maths Paper?

  1. Easy, but lengthy tha19%
  2. Moderate, but manageable31%
  3. Paper tough tha32%
  4. Here to see the poll18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ACT-Arjun Chhabra Tutorial
@ACTArjunChhabraTutorial · 40,038
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
MVSIR Classes
@camvsir · 45,623
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
Ultimate CA - Best CA Classes
@ultimatecatelegram · 31,407
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
CA Hardik Manchanda
@targetcafoundation · 62,413
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
CA Indresh Gandhi - CA Foundation & Inter Law
@caindreshgandhi · 29,620
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 7 September 2026
Akash Agrawal #TheMathsTutor
@AkashAgrawalTheMathsTutor · 37,611
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
Learn with Pranav
@learnwithpranav · 45,945
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
CA CS Karthik Manikonda
@ManikondaKarthik · 36,134
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
CA Foundation Notes ✅
@canotes_foundation · 41,126
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Commerce Tuition Classes CTC @CTCClasses
@CommerceTuitionClassesCTC · 34,656
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
VSI Jaipur Official
@vsijaipur · 21,358
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
CA Divyesh Vaghela
@Divyesh_Vaghela · 38,434
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
CA Wallah - Official PW Account
@CAwallahbypw · 80,684
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aman khedia - Your Maths Buddy” (@amankhedia), 11,340 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amankhedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.