бывает ib:amb1ix rm:OmarFX cc:amb1ix glitching:erotica #вашабогдаша #edit
😈4
Signed e8373hf

Channel
@amb1ixxx68
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
532subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001911296404 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amb1ixxx68 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amb1ixxx68 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 532 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 531 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:39 | 529 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 538 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 544 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 547 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 548 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 548 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
336 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 152 | 45.2% | |
| custom 5278237682609194570 | 38 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5445286084785234755 | 32 | 9.52% | |
| custom 5472324153749028401 | 23 | 6.85% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 4.76% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 4.17% | |
| 🏆 | 9 | 2.68% | |
| 😇 | 9 | 2.68% | |
| custom 5316505635058119947 | 8 | 2.38% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 2.08% | |
| 😈 | 6 | 1.79% | |
| custom 5393238588760553617 | 5 | 1.49% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 1.49% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 1.49% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 0.893% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.893% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.298% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 336 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @amb1ixxx68. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
бывает ib:amb1ix rm:OmarFX cc:amb1ix glitching:erotica #вашабогдаша #edit
😈4
Signed e8373hf
кто согласен с тем что у дианы прекрасный слух на биты, ставим ❤️
❤29💩3
Signed e8373hf
еше доказательство тому что я могу не делать ему больше видео
❤14custom 54452860847852347552
Signed e8373hf
Posted without readable text
custom 547232415374902840112custom 54452860847852347557❤5🔥1🥰1custom 53932385887605536171
Signed e8373hf
Posted without readable text
❤🔥14custom 547232415374902840110🏆9custom 53165056350581199475custom 53932385887605536172❤1😈1
Signed e8373hf
привет я горжусь тем что спустя два года я смогла побороть свою зависимость от человека и вовремя отказалась от того что реально приносило мне кучу боли и потраченных нервов 🤘
❤9👍3🦄1
Signed e8373hf
надоел.
❤2
Signed e8373hf
Channel name was changed to «amb1ix»
с 1 апреля 😅😂😁 rm:za.aexz
❤17😇7🔥6custom 53165056350581199473custom 53932385887605536172custom 54723241537490284011
Signed e8373hf
100 лайкосов и пф ваш ❤️ https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4rd5geP/
❤1
Signed e8373hf
лайк да какашка нет
❤1
Signed e8373hf
на это дам
❤24🙏5custom 52782376826091945704
Signed e8373hf
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @amb1ixxx68. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“amb1ix” (@amb1ixxx68), 532 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amb1ixxx68.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.