Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ambree.care

Channel

Ambree.care

@ambreecare

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,505subscribers

-403 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002194347294
TypeChannel
Username@ambreecare
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ambreecare

Growth

6,4947,1146,8046 August 2026 — 6,908 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,863 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,677 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,593 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,494 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,724 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,714 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,711 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,743 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,114 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,655 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,505 subscribers6,5056 August 202610 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 35 days, net -403. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,401–7,207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 04:376,505-150
4 Sept 2026, 13:596,655-459
1 Sept 2026, 04:147,114+371
29 Aug 2026, 05:436,743+32
26 Aug 2026, 12:266,711-3
23 Aug 2026, 11:156,714-10
20 Aug 2026, 04:226,724+230
16 Aug 2026, 20:536,494-99
13 Aug 2026, 05:266,593-84
10 Aug 2026, 13:036,677-186
7 Aug 2026, 08:426,863-45
6 Aug 2026, 09:046,908first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.56%
avg views ÷ 6,505 subscribers
Avg views / post
557
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held25 (2 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total5,012
Reactions total885
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,134 reactions across 22 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥45339.9%
❤‍🔥42337.3%
😍13511.9%
🥰12310.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 25 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ambreecare. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC251 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

К концу лета так хочется простоты и легкости: высушить волосы на солнце, не укладываться, не краситься и что называется – не париться и в этом – красота, которая летом кажется проще. 🌞 но в жару, после воды и сухого воздуха, волосы пушатся быстрее, менее гладкие, становятся жестче – волосы теряют влагу быстрее, чем в любой другой сезон. УФ делает волосы суше и тусклее, особенно если волосы окрашены или осветлены,

❤‍🔥16🔥4🥰2😍1

17 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC840 views343 reactions6 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Дарим боксы Ambree Professional & Laish💛💛 Мы с нашими друзьями Laish объединились, чтобы подарить вам косметику и спортивную форму, объединенные идеей заботы о себе, внутренней силы и уверенности в том, что ты красивая – когда настоящая. Что внутри? 1️⃣место – бокс от Laish с позицией на выбор и маленькими презентами + летний бокс Ambree (розмариновая спрей-сыворотка для роста волос & шиммер-мист на выбор & протеи

🔥221😍61🥰34❤‍🔥27

Signed RandomGodBot⚡️ [Рандомайзер]

17 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC557 views87 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Poll

  1. молочко-шиммер с бронзовым отливом51%
  2. молочко-шиммер светло-серебристый53%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥51❤‍🔥27😍9

17 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC499 views95 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

И главный вопрос – в какой команде вы?

❤‍🔥68🔥18😍9

17 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC504 views73 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥44🔥15😍8🥰6

17 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC505 views88 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро, дорогие 💛сегодня подглядываем закулисье разработок Ambree – стол СЕО Маши всегда полон баночек, потому что мы непрерывно работаем над запуском пушка-новинок 🤫

❤‍🔥61🔥19😍8

16 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC648 views61 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победитель: 1. Daria (@kalamburjaa) ✔️Проверить результаты

❤‍🔥48🥰11🔥2

Signed RandomGodBot⚡️ [Рандомайзер]

14 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC721 views66 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

PROTEIN OVERLOAD — правда или миф? 🔍 В англоязычном тиктоке частенько можно встретить термин protein overload. Что это за «протеиновая перегрузка» и правда ли это? ⏺годами на форумах и блогах девушки с кудрявыми волосами пытались объяснить, почему волосы вдруг становятся вялыми, мыльными на ощупь, шершавыми и ломкими, хотя они используют укрепляющий уход. Так и появилась она – «протеиновая перегрузка». дело в то

😍36❤‍🔥23🔥7

13 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC487 views49 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

план а: созвоны, задачи, планерки план В: речка, солнце, пляж а с протеиновым шампунем Ambree – особенно хорошо, даже (особенно!) на речке 💛💛 а в запрещенной соцсети рассказали, что за комплекс протеинов в составе и зачем их там целых 4 👀

❤‍🔥29🥰15🔥4😍1

11 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC206 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как связаны кабачки и шикарная длина? А витамин D? Новая неделя – новая подборка маленьких wellness-лайфхаков. 💛 Сегодня разбираемся, что делать, если хвост стал тоньше, а рост волос замедлился (спойлер – дело не только в вашем шампуне!)

🔥10

10 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC349 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Ambree в MAX

  1. Удобно, использую MAX28%
  2. Не пользуюсь, остаюсь в Telegram73%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥9

10 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC336 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💛 Задаем правильный настрой на неделю – пока мы готовим special с нашими друзьями, хотим узнать у вас ответ на важный вопрос: Мы понимаем, что многие столкнулись с блокировками мессенджера и проблемой с загрузкой, и хотим сделать все, чтобы вам было удобно читать нас. Будет ли вам удобно читать Ambree в мессенджере MAX?

🔥12🥰6

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @ambreecare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Poll93 voters

  1. молочко-шиммер с бронзовым отливом51%
  2. молочко-шиммер светло-серебристый53%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTCAnonymous Poll80 voters

Ambree в MAX

  1. Удобно, использую MAX28%
  2. Не пользуюсь, остаюсь в Telegram73%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ambree.care” (@ambreecare), 6,505 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ambreecare.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.