Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 62 days, net -2,117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,778–46,823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Oct 2026, 00:58
44,355
+226
2 Oct 2026, 00:39
44,129
-499
18 Sept 2026, 13:00
44,628
-87
16 Sept 2026, 08:36
44,715
-53
14 Sept 2026, 13:58
44,768
-52
13 Sept 2026, 03:37
44,820
-66
11 Sept 2026, 03:00
44,886
-108
8 Sept 2026, 07:54
44,994
-101
5 Sept 2026, 04:17
45,095
-83
3 Sept 2026, 09:22
45,178
-68
2 Sept 2026, 02:45
45,246
-33
1 Sept 2026, 06:15
45,279
-54
31 Aug 2026, 05:04
45,333
-32
30 Aug 2026, 08:24
45,365
-38
29 Aug 2026, 09:33
45,403
-44
28 Aug 2026, 07:44
45,447
-24
27 Aug 2026, 08:14
45,471
-40
26 Aug 2026, 06:16
45,511
-45
25 Aug 2026, 04:25
45,556
-46
24 Aug 2026, 00:23
45,602
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 123 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 44,355 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,830
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
26 (7 June 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
39,330
Reactions total
523
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Oct 2026, 23:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
529
Videos
136
Links
172
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,672 reactions across 26 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,043
28.4%
🤣
681
18.5%
👍
637
17.3%
😁
299
8.14%
🤬
237
6.45%
😭
172
4.68%
👏
126
3.43%
😢
116
3.16%
😐
103
2.81%
💔
60
1.63%
🤔
44
1.20%
🍌
31
0.844%
🤷♀
29
0.79%
😱
17
0.463%
🥴
16
0.436%
😨
9
0.245%
🤨
9
0.245%
🍓
7
0.191%
💘
6
0.163%
😡
5
0.136%
8 further kinds
25
0.681%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,672 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
رایتل ورشکسته شد !
اخبار امروز آگهی مزایده ۱۰۰ درصد سهام رایتل را منتشر کرد؛
قیمت پایه این واگذاری ۱۳۰ هزار میلیارد تومان (۱۳۰ همت) تعیین شده و فروش بهصورت نقدی و یکجا انجام میشود. مزایده قرار است ۲۳ مهر برگزار شود. رایتل پیشتر نیز بهدلیل مشکلات مالی و کاهش درآمد، اعلام کرده بود که در معرض ورشکستگی قرار دارد.
موج ورشکستگی بزرگی در راهه ، مراقب بیزینس هاتون باشید
🔴کاهش شدید سرعت اینترنت /طی ۲ روز گذشته پهنای باند اینترنت ایران حدود ۶۰ درصد کم شده است
احتمال قطعی دوباره و گسترده زیاده
قطع بشه یا درصد اتصال کمتر بشه ، اینجا براتون سرویس رایگان میذارم دوباره
که سعی کنم وصل نگهتون دارم و یا وصل بشید
تو کانال بله و روبیکامم یواشکی براتون میذارم 🖤🌹
معاون سازمان تنظیم مقررات و ارتباطات رادیویی گفته "حجمخوری نداریم و بخشی از ابهامات و برداشتهای کاربران درباره نحوه محاسبه میزان مصرف ترافیک اینترنت، به وضعیت ثبت اطلاعات محتوای داخلی در سامانه تعرفه ترجیحی مربوط میشود".
خلاصه: حجم خوری ندارن، ولی باقی چیزارو قول نمیدن!
️ اینستاگرام روی بعضی محتواها سختگیرتر میشود
اینستاگرام برخورد با ویدئوهای دوربینمخفی، شوخیهای آزاردهنده و فیلمبرداری از افراد بدون رضایت را جدیتر کرده است.
اگر در محتوای شما افراد دیگر حضور دارند، بهتر است قبل از انتشار، موضوع رضایت و حریم خصوصی را جدی بگیرید تا پست یا حسابتان با محدودیت مواجه نشود.
🌐 @amirreza_saeedi
رادکلودفلر :
ترافیک اینترنت بین الملل ایران از ۹۰ درصد به ۵۹ درصد رسیده،وضعیت الان اینترنت ایران دقیقا مثل روزای قبل از قطعی ۸۸ روزه ی اینترنته و با اختلالات بسیار سنگین همراه شده
@amirreza_saeedi
اگر با سرچ کردن کانال بله یا روبیکا رو پیدا نکردید
لینکش اینجاست
✅ بله :
https://ble.ir/amirrezasaeedi1
✅ روبیکا :
https://rubika.ir/amirrezasaeedi1
قطع بشه اینترنت از اونجا وصلتون میکنم
فیلترشکن JumpJump که بارها نام اون در گزارشها بعنوان یک اپ ناامن مطرح شده بود، حالا یک محصول پرریسک دیگه با نام SpeedTop VPN منتشر کرده!
این برنامه با وجود چند میلیون دانلود در گوگلپلی، طبق بررسیهای فنی پسکوچه دارای موارد نگرانکنندهای مثل وجود تعداد زیادی ردیاب، درخواست دسترسیهای غیرعادی و کدهای مرتبط با شبکه P2P هست، که میتونه دستگاه کاربران رو به بخشی از یک شبکه انتقال ترافیک تبدیل کنه.
@amirreza_saeedi
الان خرید کردن با کارت بانکی مثل دستشویی رفتن شده. اول باید چک کنی آب وصله، بعد کارتو بکنی؛ وگرنه ممکنه گیر کنی.
❎@amirreza_saeedi
🤣206😁26👍24❤21🤬16😨4
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @amirreza_saeedi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 6 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Amir Reza Saeedi / امیررضاسعیدی” (@amirreza_saeedi), 44,355 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amirreza_saeedi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.