Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 39 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 715–725 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 15:18
716
-2
29 Aug 2026, 20:38
718
-5
23 Aug 2026, 08:14
723
-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:16
724
no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:07
724
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 27 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
530 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
317
59.8%
👍
89
16.8%
❤
62
11.7%
🎉
24
4.53%
🤩
10
1.89%
😢
9
1.70%
👏
8
1.51%
😁
6
1.13%
👌
3
0.566%
🤯
2
0.377%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 530 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2024 to 28 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Manus + Meta connector targetologlarni o'rnini egallaydimi?
Bugun shu mavzuga qiziqdim va o'rganishni boshladim.
Rostdan ham manus'da o'zingizni facebook akkauntingizni ulab, hamma reklama akkauntlaringizga "доступ" ochib bersangiz bo'lar ekan.
U sizni xohlagan reklama akkauntingizga kirib reklamalaringiz samaradorligini o'lchab, nima yaxshi ishlayapti, qayerda nimani to'g'irlash kerakligini aytib berar ekan.
His…
Manus + Meta connector orqali targetologlar va SMM kompaniyalar yanada samarador bo’lishlari yoki bozordan chiqib ketishlari mumkin.
Men Manus + Meta + Amplitude stack ishlatishni boshladim. To’liq agentic.
@paiziev24
3 sekund ichida reklamangiz yaxshi natija berishi yoki bermasligini aniqlasa bo'ladi.
Har doim aytaman, reklamadagi eng asosiy narsa bu hook ya'ni birinchi 3 sekund.
Reklamangizni boshidagi 3 sekundini qo’yib ko’ring.
Agar shu 3 sekund ichida sizning maqsadli auditoriyangizni e’tiborini tortmadimi demak, reklamangiz katta ehtimol bilan yaxshi natija bermaydi.
Ingliz tili kurs sotasizmi?
Reklamani birinchi 3 seku…
Target reklamasi sotmaydi. Taklif sotadi.
Ko‘pchilik reklamalardan sotuv bo’lmasligiga budjet, reklama videosi yoki targetolog sababchi deb o‘ylashadi.
Shuning uchun ko’p biznes egalari tez tez targetologlarini almashtirishadi, budjetni oshirib ko’rishadi, kreativ sifatini yaxshilamoqchi bo’lishadi lekin natija bo’lmaydi.
Lekin ko’p hollarda asosiy muammo — biznesdagi taklifda bo’ladi.
Agar biznesingizda mijoz o’…
Ertalabdan yaxshi mashinaning ruliga o‘tirish — bu shunchaki qulaylik emas.
Bu - energiya.
Bu - kunni zo'r kayfiyatda boshlash degani.
Mashina faqat A dan B nuqtaga olib boradigan vosita emas.
U sizga sabr bilan qilgan mehnatingiz zo'r natija berishini har kuni eslatadi.
Mashina yo'lda o'zini zo'r tutadi, gaz bosishingiz bilan "uchadi", insonlar qarashadi, yo'l berishadi va bu menga yanada katta motivatsiya bera…
Assalomu Alaykum hammaga! 🙋🏻♂️
Ohirgi post avgustda bo'lgan ekan, buyog'iga aktivroq bo'lishga harakat qilaman. 😅
Lekin quruq qo'l bilan kelmadim, judayam foydali sovg'a bilan kelganman!
Bugun 24 yoshni qarshi oldim.
Shu yoshimgacha qilgan barcha xatolarimni 1 dona iqtibos bilan tushunib yetdim.
"Soatlarni o'ylab, yillarni yo'q qilamiz".
Oddiy sportga 2 soat vaqtimni tejab, ishga bag'ishladim, natijada super ko'p pul topmadim. Lekin og'irlashib qoldim va kun davomida energiyasiz yurishni boshladim.
Kitob o'qish uchun kuniga 1 soat ajrata olmadim. Shu 1 soatni ham ishlashga sarfladim. Natijada loy…
Shu kitobni o'qishni boshladim! 🚀
1 ta bo'limni hozirgina o'qib tugatdim. 1 soat vaqt qanday o'tib ketganini bilmay qolibman. 😅
Olingan insaytlarni kanalga ham joylab turaman.
Agar qiziq bo'lsa reaksiyalaringizni qoldiring! 🔥🤝🏻
Bozorda ikkinchi eng arzon xizmat ko'rsatuvchi / mahsulot sotuvchi bo'lishdan strategik foyda yo'q, lekin bozorda eng qimmat bo'lishdan foyda bor.
Faqat aniq bir sohadagi bizneslarga / insonlarga xizmat ko'rsatgan / mahsulot sotgan holda chekni bir necha barobar qimmatroq qilsa bo'ladi.
Misol uchun:
Excel kursi - 99$ / Buxgalterlar uchun maxsus excel kursi - $499
Vaqtni to'g'ri boshqarish kursi - $49 / Tadbirkor…
Ushbu kitobni vanihoyat o'qib tugatdim!
Bu kitob so'nggi 3 oy davomida menga ustoz o'rnida bo'ldi desam ham bo'ladi.
Yangi bilimlar oldim, ishda qo'lladim, foyda oldim. Ish bermaganlari ham bo'ldi, lekin tajriba oldim.
Hammaga tavsiya qilaman! 🚀
🔥20👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @amirxon_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Nima deb o'ylaysiz, narxi 1.5$ turadigan mahsulot target orqali sotishga arziydimi? 🤔
Yo'q, target yoqishga arzimaydi36%
Ha, bo'ladi64%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2024 to 28 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Asror Iskandarov | Shaxsiy Brend Qurish @asroriskandarovshb · 23,668 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Amirkhon Rustamkhujaev 🚀” (@amirxon_blog), 716 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amirxon_blog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.