Можете поучаствовать, авось заберете моего адопта 🫥

Channel
𝖆𝖒𝖔𝖗𝖆
@amorphyxia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
247subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001810421862 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amorphyxia |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amorphyxia |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:28 | 247 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:30 | 246 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 246 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 46.6%
- avg views ÷ 247 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 115
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.68%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (31 July 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,151 |
| Reactions total | 49 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
88 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5325888970368762082 | 19 | 21.6% | |
| custom 5240295030983237831 | 16 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5402206214186608075 | 16 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5249207564863815207 | 13 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5300752283426895542 | 10 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5431749705077909766 | 8 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5334964773136130692 | 6 | 6.82% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⭐️ БОЛЬШАЯ АДОПТ-ЛОТЕРЕЯ ⭐️ ...Каждый искушается, увлекаясь и обольщаясь собственною похотью; похоть же, зачав, рождает грех, а сделанный грех рождает страсть. 🔖 У вас есть шанс получить искусителя от одного из авторов: 1. @aurora_light_art 2. @sofizzy_art 3. @ksksksks_onioni 4.@ylrickkk 5. @justrussianwoman 6. @omyomen 7. @priton_cry 8. @jud69ass 9. @momonohanano_arts 10. @tttndrcult 11. @Eerikki_art 12. @amorphyxia…
Молюсь, что это как-то поможет мне стать лучше 🙂 Спасибо Вале за совет с этой книгой
custom 53258889703687620825
Надо сделать meet the artist...
custom 52492075648638152071
Мне очень не хватает общения с вами, но иногда я буквально не знаю, о чём вам рассказывать :D А щитпост... Я не понимаю хорошо это, или плохо. Вроде ближе к автору, а вроде вы здесь не за этим? Кароче... Последнее время всё чаще думаю о собственном мерче: акрилках, значках, стикерах и всякой подобной мелочи. До реализации я доберусь, скорее всего, осенью, но идеи уже потихоньку копятся. Например, меня очень зацепил…
custom 52402950309832378314custom 54022062141866080751
Скетч для @cecilia_the_great
custom 53258889703687620824custom 54022062141866080753custom 52402950309832378312custom 52492075648638152071
Какой арт лучше сделать???
- Жопа 🙈24%
- Селфи сестричек 😽35%
- ОБА 🤔🍺41%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 52492075648638152073
Хочется летнее что-нибудь сделать с Фрейей, но не могу понять что по итогу из этого делать 💃
custom 53007522834268955425custom 53258889703687620824custom 54022062141866080753
К слову, у меня тут вырисовалась такая вкусная фурсона, я очень надеюсь, что вы оцените ее 🤩 Идея претерпела множество изменений, так что думаю концепт вам зайдет... Надеюсь....... После комишек начну тизерить ✋✋✋
custom 53349647731361306924
Я не знаю любите ли вы випки, но просто зацените эти шипы 🥺
custom 52402950309832378315custom 53349647731361306922custom 54022062141866080752
Почему работы на заказ выглядят гораздо лучше и сильнее чем то что я для себя рисую ПОЧЕМУ 😞😞😞😞
custom 54022062141866080751
Некоторый заказ на ящерицу 😋😋
custom 52402950309832378313custom 53007522834268955421custom 53258889703687620821
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @amorphyxia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой арт лучше сделать???
- Жопа 🙈24%
- Селфи сестричек 😽35%
- ОБА 🤔🍺41%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@aurora_light_art · 1301 postКоробка сломанной игрушки
@brtoy_box · 1621 postℭ𝔢𝔠𝔦𝔩𝔦𝔞🦢
@cecilia_the_great · 2141 postEerikki 18+
@Eerikki_art · 651 postElkaim
@elka1m · 1031 postRE.GGEN ⸝⸝
@ggenesissleep · 1071 postjudas.¹⁸⁺ 🍒 рест
@jud69ass · 551 postшик бздик🍤
@ksksksks_onioni · 6281 post𝕸𝖔𝖗𝖎 • 𝖆𝖗𝖙 • 𝖙𝖎 【18+】
@m_mori_art · 1951 post🍑 momonohanano 🍑 | рисует | 18+
@momonohanano_arts · 2371 postмаруня
@morunie · 6811 postмурмама¹
@murmama1 · 7541 postКроличья норка ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ 18+
@norarebbit · 951 postSect of Omy {18+}
@omyomen · 1211 post18+ Plazma
@pllazmm · 6131 postпереходниЧОК нытика!1
@priton_cry · 331 postLin Lisya
@shiziklinlis · 1731 post🌸Софизи🌸
@sofizzy_art · 1,5241 postсонч
@sonchhhhhhhhhhhh · 1621 post𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡.
@tttndrcult · 841 post𓆩Ɏłɍīȼҟҟҟ𓆪 ♡ 18+
@Ylrickkk · 871 post✧ YOKITERASU 妖怪 ✧
@yokiterasu · 3421 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝖆𝖒𝖔𝖗𝖆” (@amorphyxia), 247 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amorphyxia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.