Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 235–243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 12:40
242
+1
29 Aug 2026, 11:43
241
+1
21 Aug 2026, 11:14
240
+2
15 Aug 2026, 05:39
238
+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:01
236
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:46
236
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
69 reactions across 5 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
25
36.2%
custom 5328316288315962545
15
21.7%
❤
10
14.5%
custom 5402383085234822937
6
8.70%
custom 5409181477298512340
3
4.35%
🥰
3
4.35%
custom 5379743784336639310
2
2.90%
custom 5469912654166375866
2
2.90%
custom 5415986543741390731
1
1.45%
💘
1
1.45%
🔥
1
1.45%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мы просто взяли костюмы и пошли выгуливать своих собак 🐕 и вот, что получилось. 🐺
Конечно, «Падучая собака» — спектакль о человеке. О попытке понять, что происходит между нами и искусством. Почему нас одновременно тянет к красоте, хаосу, иронии, бунту, нежности и свободе. Почему иногда мы так хотим быть понятыми, а иногда просто выть.
панк, постмодерн, танец, музыка в теле и взгляде на мир, не замутнённом правилам…
Собаки едут в Петербург не с пустыми лапами.🐾🐾🐾
Мы везём мерч.
И фирменные презики в том числе. А ещё шоперы, сумки и другие приятные глазу и вашему стилю вещи.
Приходите заранее, чтобы успеть всё рассмотреть и забрать своё приятное воспоминание об «Амуре8».
15 августа. ESCABO, Санкт-Петербург, ул. Пионерская 50. Билеты 🎟️.
📸 @vifleeem
Она старается в искусстве, мы все стараемся в искусстве. 😐
😵💫 Новый выпуск интервью от персонажей спектакля «Падучая собака».
Приходите смотреть на наши старания 🐶 Санкт-Петербург, 15 августа, ESCABO. Билеты 🎟️
15 августа едем в Питер!
«Падучая собака» — спектакль, в котором мы наиболее радикально формулируем свою художественную позицию.
В основе короткий рассказ классика американского постмодернизма Дональда Бартельми. Однако спектакль не является инсценировкой текста.
Это не история одного человека, а попытка поговорить о том, что сегодня происходит с искусством и с теми, кто продолжает в него верить. Здесь балет сталк…
Любовь — странная штука. Для каждого своя. 💘
Перед показом «Амура и Психеи» мы задали зрителям всего два вопроса:
Что для вас любовь? И с какими ожиданиями вы пришли на спектакль? А после попросили поделиться впечатлениями.
Получилось три классных видео. Спасибо каждому, кто согласился стать частью этой истории. 💗
Тем временем, открываем ранние продажи на следующий показ в Москве.
14 февраля 2027 года (Москва), в…
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @amour8theater. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АМУР8” (@amour8theater), 242 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amour8theater.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
