Channel
@analizclusters
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,598subscribers
-47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001329921976 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @analizclusters |
| Created | 3 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/analizclusters |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 2,598 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 2,607 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 2,613 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:29 | 2,620 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 2,625 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 2,628 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 2,635 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 2,640 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:40 | 2,644 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 2,645 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:49 | 2,645 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
18 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 15 | 83.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну и кластерный график от Cluster Btc Здесь все те же лимиты, но визуально на графике в виде кластеров Тоже отлично показал лимитный дисбаланс, и то как покупатели крупными покупками не влияли на цену
🔥4
Signed Fanit
Еще один имбовый инструмент Disbalans Тут множество настроек рыночных данных, я себе настроил соотношения бидов и асков на разных глубинах, где хорошо видны дисбалансы Ребята переходят на новый сайт, где все будет быстрее, удобнее, "под рукой" Подписка @cocacartov, мой промо-код MAYAK (-15%)
Signed Fanit
Просто топ инструмент от Сергея Соника Antitrade Работа с лимитами отличная и без каких либо сбоев, если нет времени следить есть куча ботов анализаторов, например как отчет по битку за 60 минут (сегодня были видны аномальные значения перед продажами Только от меня этой платформой начали пользоваться 388 человек
🔥3
Signed Fanit
Сегодня шорт закрыл шорт в две позиции Цель по челленджу выполнил ✅ 709,5$/600$ Будут посты про платформы, которые помогли мне в анализе и поиске сегодняшнего шорта
🔥2
Signed Fanit
Дошли до зоны спроса, шорт прикрыл Выше на перевесе асков буду искать новую точку входа
👍3
Signed Fanit
Вот так выглядит меню челленджа
Signed Fanit
Вчера шорт открывали 2 стадия в торгах
Signed Fanit
После открытия шорта была просадка бидов на 60% Снизу появились объемы Шорт открыт
Signed Fanit
30 и 31 июля - два самых насыщенных дня месяца по рыночным событиям. 29 июля ФРС объявляет решение по ставке, и впервые за годы у рынка нет консенсуса: фьючерсы дают примерно 70% за паузу и 30% за повышение, хотя обычно перед заседанием консенсус близок к 99%. Новый глава ФРС свернул практику подсказок рынку, так что реакция может быть резкой в любую сторону. 30 июля выходят базовый PCE (главный инфляционный ориент…
Signed Fanit
Шорт закрыт
🔥6
Signed Fanit
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @analizclusters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маяк ликвидности” (@analizclusters), 2,598 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/analizclusters.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.