Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
20 measurements spanning 85 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,985–2,018 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Oct 2026, 08:29
2,013
-1
28 Oct 2026, 12:08
2,014
+1
25 Oct 2026, 21:04
2,013
+2
23 Oct 2026, 04:40
2,011
+3
20 Oct 2026, 00:16
2,008
+10
17 Oct 2026, 01:29
1,998
-1
10 Oct 2026, 15:00
1,999
+6
4 Oct 2026, 16:20
1,993
+4
12 Sept 2026, 14:39
1,989
-3
8 Sept 2026, 03:36
1,992
+3
3 Sept 2026, 09:04
1,989
-1
31 Aug 2026, 01:04
1,990
-2
28 Aug 2026, 02:58
1,992
-13
25 Aug 2026, 01:53
2,005
-2
21 Aug 2026, 05:02
2,007
+1
17 Aug 2026, 21:33
2,006
-3
14 Aug 2026, 19:05
2,009
+5
11 Aug 2026, 01:42
2,004
+4
7 Aug 2026, 20:33
2,000
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:29
2,000
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
41s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
173 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
110
63.6%
👍
39
22.5%
🙏
10
5.78%
custom 5303310030940952439
4
2.31%
❤🔥
4
2.31%
💯
3
1.73%
🔥
3
1.73%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня в запрещенной соц сети ( которой мы ,конечно же , не пользуемся 😅) увидела интересные сторис , где мастер исправляет платья.
Где вроде и эскиз хорош , но что-то пошло не так.
Чуть плотнее бахрома , чем надо , не учли пропорции ребенка , низ юбки укорачивает ноги .
Меня это очень впечатлило . И навело на мысль , да , ИИ может уже красиво нарисовать картинку , может красиво описать «умными словами», но еще не с…
Делюсь красотой )
У отношений есть все шансы …если тебе вместо : « что ты там в этих кустах забыла?» говорят : «возьми мой телефон , у него камера лучше»
Сегодня будет пост звездеца. 🐎
Не люблю ныть, не люблю жаловаться. Но почему-то вчера подумала, что, возможно, есть люди, которые сейчас испытывают такие же эмоции. И на их месте я бы хотела знать, что не одна чувствую себя так.
В общем, это состояние я могу сравнить с ездой на лошади.
Будто ещё пару лет назад я мчалась верхом. Да, моя лошадь периодически спотыкалась, где-то застревала, перепрыгивала такие ямы, ка…
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Procreate или Infinite Painter? 🎨
Вечный вопрос среди художников и дизайнеров 👀
✨ Procreate — быстрый, удобный, идеален для эскизов, иллюстраций и работы с кистями. ✨ Infinite Painter — больше про живопись, текстуры и реалистичные кисти.
Но на самом деле главное — не программа, а навык художника 😉
А теперь интересно👇 В чём рисуете вы? 🎨 Procreate 🖌 Infinite Painter ✏️ Другая программа?
Запущу голосовалку - проверим к…
Обновление жестов в Procreate 5.4
Которое я только узнала 😅
Пипетка для активного слоя (eyedropper active layer)
При использовании пипетки можно удерживать второй палец на экране - тогда Procreate возьмет образец цвета строго с текущего выбранного слоя , полностью игнорируя режимы наложения , прозрачность или цвета других слоев .
❤9
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @anastasiyasketches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anastasiya.sketch” (@anastasiyasketches), 2,013 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anastasiyasketches.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.