Channel
@ancap_cat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
324subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001555210344 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ancap_cat |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ancap_cat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 324 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 322 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 323 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 322 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 325 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:39 | 325 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5424875657165292238 | 27 | 71.1% | |
| custom 5402600943155958567 | 11 | 28.9% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ancap_cat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
От прочтения этой новости поднимается тестостерон, и это не просто образное выражение — это научно задокументированны факт. Прочитавшие эту новость испытывают острое стремление встать и могучим басом произнести: РУССКИЕ КРУТО Но почему Кэгэбэстан скрывает лицо могучего русского героя? Настоящие комментарии
custom 54248756571652922385
Как понять, что в твоей стране у людей поголовно проблемы с коммуникацией, и они не умеют договариваться? У вас не две партии Я знаю это, потому что сам не умею договариваться Настоящие комментарии
События в Испании — репетиция. Как с китайским коронавирусом. Это произошло в африканской части Испании не потому, что там много африканцев. Точнее, не только поэтому, но и потому, что физическая преграда в виде пролива позволяет остановить и откатить события, если потребуется Настоящие комментарии
custom 54248756571652922384
Когда я говорил, что уроки литературы в школе программируют мужчин садиться в тюрьму и жениться на проститутках, я совсем забыл про женщин Настоящие комментарии
custom 54248756571652922383
И не повторяйте устоявшиеся выражения за одержимыми Настоящие комментарии
Архитектор карантинобесия Фаучи сослался на Пятую поправку и категорически отказался отвечать на все вопросы Сената США. Господа. Я как главный ученый и главный конспиролог призываю вас не праздновать победу преждевременно. Да, китайский коронавирус имеет лабораторное происхождение. Но мы всё ещё не доказали. Да, слушания в Сенате многое проясняют. Да, мы и без них точно это знаем, что китайскую заразу сделали колд…
custom 54026009431559585672
4 апреля 1917 года Германия организовала проезд банды Ленина в запломбированном вагоне для ослабления России в Первой мировой войне
custom 54026009431559585673
Читает
Кто даст ответ, почему в книге Ганнибал Лектер пьет Амароне, а в фильме — Кьянти? И как этот вопрос связан с предыдущим?
Кто даст ответ, почему в русских былинах у витязя три пути, а у Васнецова только один? Как пряму ехати — живу не бывати: нет пути ни прохожему, ни проезжему, ни пролетному
File, posted without a caption
Классическая обманка этатистов с либертарианской наживкой. Никто не разрешит купить БУК и посадить своего сисадмина управлять ей. Просто государство выделит тебе установку и посадит в нее солдафонов, а ты будешь оплачивать аренду плюс паёк (по государственным попилочным нормативам) и зарплату солдафонов, плюс боеприпасы. Ключевое слово "выделит": саму установку не факт что установят. Сейчас идет штурм Нижней Залупки,…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ancap_cat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Коты при анкапе 🔺” (@ancap_cat), 324 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ancap_cat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.