Жлу актив
❤31🥴8❤🔥2👍1🤗1🤩1😍1

Channel
@anddriyashkaa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10,085subscribers
+534 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003596145902 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anddriyashkaa |
| Description | Все текста будут тут По поводу рекламы писать @mr_andreikaaa 🎂Дата рождения канала 17.01.2026 Прайм и реклама @prais_reklama2026 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anddriyashkaa |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 15:17 | 10,085 | +5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:40 | 10,080 | +17 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:17 | 10,063 | +131 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:38 | 9,932 | +47 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:58 | 9,885 | +15 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:51 | 9,870 | +9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 9,861 | -13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:18 | 9,874 | +432 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:18 | 9,442 | -44 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 03:50 | 9,486 | -8 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 9,494 | +126 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:21 | 9,368 | -34 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 9,402 | +9 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 9,393 | +6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 9,387 | +28 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:14 | 9,359 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:08 | 9,366 | -51 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 9,417 | +102 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 9,315 | -56 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 9,371 | first reading |
68 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (19 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 69,530 |
| Reactions total | 1,572 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2,943 reactions across 59 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,058 | 69.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 378 | 12.8% | |
| 👍 | 176 | 5.98% | |
| 💘 | 68 | 2.31% | |
| 🥴 | 62 | 2.11% | |
| 🤩 | 61 | 2.07% | |
| 💋 | 52 | 1.77% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 1.22% | |
| 🤗 | 28 | 0.951% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 0.68% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.068% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.068% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,943 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anddriyashkaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 68 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Жлу актив
❤31🥴8❤🔥2👍1🤗1🤩1😍1
Я хочу, чтобы ты иногда смотрел(а) на себя моими глазами. Тогда ты бы увидел(а), насколько ты особенный человек. Ты можешь не замечать своих достоинств, переживать из-за недостатков и сравнивать себя с другими, но для меня твоя ценность совершенно не измеряется чужими оценками. Мне нравится твоя индивидуальность, твой характер, твои привычки и даже те мелочи, которые ты сам(а) считаешь незначительными. Не пытайся ста…
❤39❤🔥6🔥5🤩3💋1💘1💯1🥴1
Мало актива народ
❤54🥴9🤩5❤🔥3👍2💘1💯1🤗1
Я могу услышать песню и вспомнить тебя. Увидеть красивый закат и захотеть показать его тебе. Прочитать интересную историю и сразу подумать, как бы ты на неё отреагировал(а). Ты каким-то невероятным образом стал(а) частью моих обычных дней. И самое удивительное, что мне совсем не хочется от этого избавляться. Наоборот, я хочу ещё больше совместных воспоминаний, разговоров и маленьких моментов, которые однажды станут ч…
❤40🔥5🤩5❤🔥1💘1💯1🤗1
Мне не нужно, чтобы ты каждый день совершал(а) что-то невероятное. Мне хочется обычного счастья: просыпаться с хорошими мыслями о тебе, получать твои сообщения, делиться новостями и знать, что вечером мы снова поговорим. Я хочу смеяться с тобой над глупостями, поддерживать тебя в трудные дни и радоваться твоим победам так, будто это мои собственные. Иногда счастье действительно заключается не в больших событиях, а в …
❤22❤🔥4🥴1
Я могу услышать песню и вспомнить тебя. Увидеть красивый закат и захотеть показать его тебе. Прочитать интересную историю и сразу подумать, как бы ты на неё отреагировал(а). Ты каким-то невероятным образом стал(а) частью моих обычных дней. И самое удивительное, что мне совсем не хочется от этого избавляться. Наоборот, я хочу ещё больше совместных воспоминаний, разговоров и маленьких моментов, которые однажды станут ч…
❤21❤🔥5🔥1🥴1
Если бы мне снова пришлось пережить все наши знакомства, разговоры, случайные моменты и долгие переписки, я бы всё равно захотел(а) встретить тебя. Возможно, у нас не всегда всё получается идеально, иногда мы можем обижаться, спорить и не понимать друг друга. Но именно поэтому я ценю то, что между нами есть. Настоящие чувства не означают отсутствие трудностей. Они означают желание слышать друг друга и вместе искать в…
❤22❤🔥6🤩1
Дайте жару, наввлите активчика❤️
❤59❤🔥11👍4💋2🤩1
Я хочу, чтобы рядом с тобой всегда был человек, которому не придётся напоминать о твоей ценности. Который будет замечать твою грусть даже за улыбкой, спрашивать, как прошёл день, и искренне интересоваться твоими переживаниями. Ты заслуживаешь не красивых обещаний, а поступков. Не временного внимания, а постоянной заботы. Не отношений, в которых нужно постоянно бояться потерять человека, а отношений, в которых можно с…
❤50❤🔥9👍3🔥2😘1
Жду 60 лайков и следующий текст
❤67❤🔥8💋8
Иногда мне хочется просто оказаться рядом с тобой, крепко обнять и забыть обо всём на свете. Не говорить ничего особенного, не искать подходящих слов, а просто чувствовать, что ты рядом. Мне не хватает твоего голоса, твоих улыбок, наших разговоров и даже самых обычных моментов. Я могу заниматься своими делами, смеяться и делать вид, что всё как обычно, но где-то внутри всё равно хочется к тебе. Расстояние может разде…
❤67❤🔥11💋9🥴2
Спасибо вам за 10тысяч подписчиков
❤67💘5
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @anddriyashkaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@anddriyashkaa edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 8 posts on @anddriyashkaa as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@anddriyashkaa named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тикток текста😜😍” (@anddriyashkaa), 10,085 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anddriyashkaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.