Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ANDREAS KALCKER Official International

Channel

ANDREAS KALCKER Official International

@andreaskalckerofficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

58,623subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001281429775
TypeChannel
Username@andreaskalckerofficial
Description🌎 Official channel of Andreas Kalcker 🙂 ¡El CDS salva vidas! ¿hay algo más gratificante? CDS saves lives! Is there anything more fulfilling? CDS rettet Leben! Gibt es etwas Schöneres? HUB 👉🏻 www.kalckerinstitute.com Web 🌐 www.andreaskalcker.com
Created25 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/andreaskalckerofficial

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

58,57458,64058,6076 August 2026 — 58,609 subscribers6 August 2026 — 58,612 subscribers7 August 2026 — 58,610 subscribers8 August 2026 — 58,614 subscribers9 August 2026 — 58,633 subscribers10 August 2026 — 58,617 subscribers11 August 2026 — 58,602 subscribers14 August 2026 — 58,614 subscribers16 August 2026 — 58,627 subscribers17 August 2026 — 58,628 subscribers18 August 2026 — 58,630 subscribers19 August 2026 — 58,629 subscribers20 August 2026 — 58,620 subscribers21 August 2026 — 58,626 subscribers23 August 2026 — 58,618 subscribers24 August 2026 — 58,616 subscribers25 August 2026 — 58,626 subscribers27 August 2026 — 58,634 subscribers28 August 2026 — 58,629 subscribers29 August 2026 — 58,640 subscribers30 August 2026 — 58,623 subscribers31 August 2026 — 58,616 subscribers1 September 2026 — 58,620 subscribers2 September 2026 — 58,609 subscribers3 September 2026 — 58,599 subscribers5 September 2026 — 58,597 subscribers8 September 2026 — 58,584 subscribers11 September 2026 — 58,578 subscribers13 September 2026 — 58,577 subscribers15 September 2026 — 58,574 subscribers19 September 2026 — 58,578 subscribers26 September 2026 — 58,623 subscribers58,6236 August 202626 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 51 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,564–58,650 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 08:4258,623+45
19 Sept 2026, 11:5858,578+4
15 Sept 2026, 00:5958,574-3
13 Sept 2026, 08:5558,577-1
11 Sept 2026, 09:4058,578-6
8 Sept 2026, 13:1658,584-13
5 Sept 2026, 07:3658,597-2
3 Sept 2026, 09:1658,599-10
2 Sept 2026, 04:0558,609-11
1 Sept 2026, 01:3858,620+4
31 Aug 2026, 01:4558,616-7
30 Aug 2026, 03:4558,623-17
29 Aug 2026, 03:4258,640+11
28 Aug 2026, 05:1558,629-5
27 Aug 2026, 02:1858,634+8
25 Aug 2026, 23:2358,626+10
24 Aug 2026, 20:0458,616-2
23 Aug 2026, 07:3858,618-8
21 Aug 2026, 20:1558,626+6
20 Aug 2026, 19:1158,620first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.10%
avg views ÷ 58,623 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,330
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.662%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held73 (18 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total165,330
Reactions total1,094
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 16:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,350
Videos
≈845
Links
≈3,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 18s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,598 reactions across 69 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,80869.6%
👍32312.4%
👏2419.28%
🙏1455.58%
🔥421.62%
🥰391.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,598 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,720 views33 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Buenas tardes 💕💕💕[email protected]💕💕💕Dios lo bendiga 🙏🏻 Nunca voy a dejar de creer en el cds que es una maravilla y si, lo recomiendo, claro,!! sobre el criterio de cada persona si lo gusta tomar y la verdad a quien lo e recomendado lo han tomado y les a dado resultados Ud, hace lo suyo en ayudarnos y yo hago lo mío en que la gente lo conozca y sepa lo maravilloso que es el cds para las diversas enfermedades qu…

❤26🙏6👍1

26 Sept 2026, 06:18 UTC≈1,430 views10 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍4👏4❤2

25 Sept 2026, 13:28 UTC≈2,740 views22 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤19🙏3

25 Sept 2026, 13:28 UTC≈2,780 views74 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Bueno, quiero compartir con vosotros. Mi gato Mel de cinco años le diagnosticaron un Linfoma en los ganglios, hace un més. El pronóstico muy malo, esperanza de vida...un més, dos, una semana... Yo no me lo podía creer. Le pusieron una sonda gàstrica porqué dejo de comer. Empecé a darle tomas día y noche el CDS. La mejoria fue inmediata, empezó a comer por si sólo. Hoy volvimos al hospital veterinario para quitarle la…

❤34🥰22🙏11👏7

22 Sept 2026, 11:24 UTC≈4,580 views28 reactionsread 26 September 2026

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4125/6/5/91 La comprensione scientifica del biossido di cloro (CDS) è appena entrata in una nuova fase. Dopo anni di controversie, una domanda fondamentale è rimasta senza risposta: Come funziona effettivamente il biossido di cloro a livello biofisico? Ora, la scienza sta compiendo un nuovo passo avanti. La rivista scientifica internazionale MDPI Biophysica, una pubblicazione di p…

❤20👏5🥰3

22 Sept 2026, 11:24 UTC≈3,890 views12 reactionsread 26 September 2026

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4125/6/5/91 La compréhension scientifique du dioxyde de chlore entre dans une nouvelle ère. Après des années de controverse, une question essentielle demeurait : Comment le dioxyde de chlore agit-il concrètement au niveau biophysique ? Aujourd’hui, la science fait un pas de plus. La revue scientifique internationale MDPI Biophysica, publication de référence en biophysique, vient…

🙏6❤5👏1

22 Sept 2026, 11:23 UTC≈4,530 views19 reactionsread 26 September 2026

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4125/6/5/91 Die Wahrheit über Chlordioxid (CDS) hat eine neue Phase erreicht. Nach Jahren kontroverser Wissenschaftlicher Diskussion bleibt eine Frage: Wie wirkt Chlordioxid wirklich auf biophysikalischer Ebene wirklich? Nun ist die Wissenschaft einen Schritt weiter. Die internationale Fachzeitschrift MDPI Biophysica, eine der führenden Publikationen im Bereich der Biophysik, hat ein…

❤13🔥3🙏2👍1

22 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC≈3,270 views17 reactionsread 26 September 2026

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4125/6/5/91 The scientific understanding of CDS has just entered a new phase. After years of controversy, one essential question has remained: How does chlorine dioxide actually work at a biophysical level? Now, science is taking a new step forward. The international scientific journal MDPI Biophysica—a top-tier publication in the field of biophysics—has just published a new article by Dr…

❤10👏7

22 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC≈3,430 views50 reactionsread 26 September 2026

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4125/6/5/91 La verdad científica sobre el CDS acaba de entrar en una nueva etapa Durante años años de controversia, una pregunta esencial has sido ¿Cómo actúa realmente el dióxido de cloro a nivel biofísico? Ahora, la ciencia da un nuevo paso. La revista científica internacional MDPI Biophysica, una publicación de máxima categoría en el ámbito de la biofísica, acaba de publicar un nuevo …

❤32👏17👍1

22 Sept 2026, 06:04 UTC≈3,490 views20 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Tal vez, no fue lo correcto usar el cds puro, Pero cada persona, lo puede usar según su cuerpo lo permita, por lo pronto, ahora lo usaré ya rebajado.

❤15🙏4👍1

22 Sept 2026, 06:04 UTC≈3,810 views28 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤25👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @andreaskalckerofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ANDREAS KALCKER Official International” (@andreaskalckerofficial), 58,623 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andreaskalckerofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.