Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Андрей Антонов - НейроШифт ❤️💚💙

Channel

Андрей Антонов - НейроШифт ❤️💚💙

@andreiantonov888

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,893subscribers

+470 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001594870344
TypeChannel
Username@andreiantonov888
Description🔴 Система быстрого достижения целей - 22 нейротренажера для мозга 🔵 Создание баланса в отношениях, деньгах и здоровье. 🟢 Бесплатный тест-драйв системы с основателем 👉 https://clck.ru/3REoFC
Created24 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/andreiantonov888

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,3658,8938,6297 August 2026 — 8,423 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,426 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,420 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,394 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,375 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,365 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,379 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,391 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,394 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,422 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,449 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,552 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,615 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,614 subscribers25 September 2026 — 8,621 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,691 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,729 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,740 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,783 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,809 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,851 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,870 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,872 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,876 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,885 subscribers8 November 2026 — 8,893 subscribers7 August 20268 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 93 days, net +470. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,286–8,972 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 00:408,893+8
4 Nov 2026, 21:288,885+9
2 Nov 2026, 05:098,876+4
30 Oct 2026, 03:598,872+2
26 Oct 2026, 18:418,870+19
24 Oct 2026, 04:578,851+42
21 Oct 2026, 04:168,809+26
18 Oct 2026, 03:358,783+43
15 Oct 2026, 00:418,740+11
11 Oct 2026, 19:378,729+38
5 Oct 2026, 00:568,691+70
25 Sept 2026, 22:598,621+7
17 Sept 2026, 11:188,614-1
13 Sept 2026, 06:388,615+63
9 Sept 2026, 04:228,552+103
3 Sept 2026, 22:368,449+27
1 Sept 2026, 00:158,422+28
29 Aug 2026, 06:258,394+3
26 Aug 2026, 08:538,391+12
22 Aug 2026, 23:178,379first reading

Engagement

120 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.42%
avg views ÷ 8,893 subscribers
Avg views / post
216
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 120 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held120 (31 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total8,192
Reactions total200
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 11:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,860
Videos
≈1,630
Links
≈1,980

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 11s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

637 reactions across 90 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥26341.3%
❤13921.8%
👍10015.7%
💯477.38%
❤‍🔥264.08%
👏213.30%
👌182.83%
🥰101.57%
🎉30.471%
😍30.471%
🙈20.314%
🤩20.314%
⚡10.157%
🏆10.157%
🕊10.157%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 120 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 637 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 116 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @andreiantonov888. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 120 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 20 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (51.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 09:10 UTC147 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026

5 страхов, которые держат вашу жизнь в одной точке 😱 За пятнадцать лет практики я увидел: люди застревают не от отсутствия возможностей, не от лени и не от «не того окружения». Они застревают от пяти конкретных страхов, которые редко произносят вслух — даже самим себе. 1. Страх, что жизнь уже прошла, и вторая половина будет такой же Это про ощущение «до сорока можно ещё дотянуть, а до пятидесяти — как-нибудь, и по…

👍2

7 Nov 2026, 07:16 UTC136 viewsread 8 November 2026

МЫ НАЧАЛИ КОНСУЛЬТАЦИЮ! ▶️ Вход в эфир в Zoom Подкоючайтесь!

7 Nov 2026, 07:14 UTC134 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍2🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC140 views8 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Это признание правды о себе меня однажды неприятно шокировало... Я оказался знатным ИЗБЕГАТЕЛЕМ маленьких неприятных дел. Ломать эту привычку пришлось годами. Годами😭😭😭 И вот прошло больше 10 лет, как я начал тренировать самодисциплину. Но мой внутренний ленивец, который по-прежнему не любит рутину и неприятные задачи, все равно иногда напоминает о себе. Особенно, когда надо делать ежедневную тренировку тела и м…

🔥5👌1👍1💯1

7 Nov 2026, 05:55 UTCviews —

Андрей Антонов - НейроШифт ❤️💚💙 pinned a photo

7 Nov 2026, 05:53 UTC132 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

▶️ СЕГОДНЯ В 10:00 МСК — подключайтесь к эфиру КОНСУЛЬТАЦИИ И ОТВЕТЫ НА ВОПРОСЫ Пьем чай, общаемся и разбираем ваши сложные ситуации в жизни. ▶️ Вход в эфир в Zoom Ссылка будет активна в 10:00‼️ 💬 Пишите свои вопросы в комментариях — мы обязательно их обсудим

6 Nov 2026, 12:20 UTC161 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

КОГДА ВЫ ВЕРИТЕ, ЧТО ВЫХОД ЕСТЬ, ВЫ ПРОДОЛЖАЕТЕ ЕГО ИСКАТЬ А что, если ваши возможности гораздо больше, чем вы думаете? В 1957 году учёный Курт Рихтер исследовал поведение крыс, оказавшихся в воде без возможности выбраться. Некоторые быстро прекращали сопротивление. Но после кратковременного спасения животные могли продолжать плавать десятки часов. Учёный предположил: ощущение безвыходности влияет на способность ор…

🔥5❤1👍1

6 Nov 2026, 04:58 UTC160 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Есть 5 самых распространенных страхов, блокирующих наш рост и изменение жизни. Ставьте 🔥🔥🔥 Соберем 50 реакций - расскажу про каждый

🔥18

6 Nov 2026, 04:19 UTC164 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
Photo

«Вы делаете реальное дело. Жизни меняете» – это самое ценное, что я мог услышать, ради этого я и работаю! 🔥🔥🔥 Все участники ежедневно находят свою истинную цель, прорабатывают страхи, обиды и меняют жизни на уровне бессознательного! Каждый участник строит свой маршрут к достижению цели, без сомнений и препятствий. Но есть у наших учеников в каждом потоке кое-что важное: МНОГИХ СКОВЫВАЕТ СТРАХ. Именно страх чаще…

👍5

5 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC185 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤1👍1

5 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC181 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Я начал трансляцию! Присоединяйтесь прямо сейчас ВХОД В ZOOM 👈

5 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTC184 viewsread 8 November 2026

Готовность 10 минут ‼️ ВХОД В ZOOM 👈

Showing the 12 most recent of 120 posts we hold for @andreiantonov888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@andreiantonov888 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTCAnonymous Poll74 voters

🔻ТЕСТ-ОПРОС🔻 Какое качество отличает счастливых людей, живущих в балансе всех сфер?

  1. Сильный0%
  2. Целеустремленный5%
  3. Осознанный35%
  4. Добрый3%
  5. Уверенный5%
  6. Мудрый16%
  7. Решительный3%
  8. Отдающий4%
  9. Ответственный4%
  10. Дисциплинированный24%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Практическая психология для женщин - PSY-инженерия. Официальный канал Марты Николаевой-Гариной
@marta_ng · 23,343
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
Йога для начинающих YOGA work
@yogawork · 47,741
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Андрей Антонов - НейроШифт ❤️💚💙” (@andreiantonov888), 8,893 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andreiantonov888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.