Channel
@androcentrismhatecf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003938734461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @androcentrismhatecf |
| Created | 20 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/androcentrismhatecf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 21 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 18 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 18 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 15 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
49 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 51.0% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 16.3% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 12.2% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 10.2% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 10.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
лмао, нас так сильно раздражает то, что в медиа женщин не могут нормально репрезентировать и раскрыть в ходе сюжета без участия мужских персонажей или какой-либо сексуализации и объективизации женских персонажей, из-за чего они со стороны выглядят как пустышки либо как сексуальные объекты ☹️☹️ я, к сожалению, очень редко видим хорошую репрезентацию женщин в медиа, ибо большую часть времени их даже не могут нормально…
❤6💯3👍1
Извечная мне кажется тема это феминитивы Раздражает, что "нейтральным" родом считается именно мужской, хотя уже давно придумали нейтралятивы как минимум Но люди не могут принять даже "психологиня", что ещё можно говорить о нейтралятивах @androhatebot ☆゙ #тейк
❤5👍2💯2
У меня из головы уже пару месяцев не выходит это Попалось в интернете, как в Китае сделали робота с женским телом. Угадайте, какие там были комментарии? «Зачем роботу такие формы», «Зачем и ради чего?» с явным сексуальным подтекстом. Меня невероятно сильно это взбесило, потому что это так явно показывает, как к женщинам относятся некоторые люди. Робот с мужским телом — база, ни у кого нет к этому вопросов. А робот с …
❤6💯3👍2
🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩БОТ 🤩ВП ПОСТ 🤩ДНИ 🤩ЧАТ 🤩БУСТ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
❤1💘1🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🩵🩵 🩵🩵🩵🩵 🩵от 0+ 🩵промежуток 5 минут 🩵не делаем на темы: 𓏴 нсфв 𓏴 гуро 𓏴 селфхарм 𓏴 парафилии 𓏴 дискриминация меньшинств 𓏴 радквир 𓏴 радинклюз/радэксклюз 𓏴 терф 𓏴 даркшипы 𓏴 каналы без дни 𓏴 каналы входящие в наши дни 🩵можем отказать без указания причины 🩵больше 7 каналов где не написано порог, пдп, дни и тематика – отказ 🤩рт пост 🏝🏝
❤2🔥2💘1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🩵🩵🩵🩵 ANDROCENTRISM 🔅🔅 🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧⭐️❗️⭐️🪧🪧 🩵Часто встречали андроцентризм в медиа/реальности и вас он раздражает? Хотите поделиться? 💌💌Тогда вы по адресу! 🤍 Андроцентризм — это мировоззрение, при котором мужской опыт и точка зрения воспринимаются как норма, а женские интересы, достижения и потребности игнорируются или считаются «вторичными» ВП ПОСТ | НАВИГАЦИЯ | БОТ
❤5💘3🔥3
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @androcentrismhatecf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Androcentrism hate cf” (@androcentrismhatecf), 21 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/androcentrismhatecf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.