Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Андрей Коток | Трафик для инфобиза

Channel

Андрей Коток | Трафик для инфобиза

@andrykotok

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

702subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001738197136
TypeChannel
Username@andrykotok
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/andrykotok

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7027067047 August 2026 — 706 subscribers8 August 2026 — 706 subscribers21 August 2026 — 704 subscribers27 August 2026 — 706 subscribers2 September 2026 — 705 subscribers11 September 2026 — 702 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 35 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 701–707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 18:20702-3
2 Sept 2026, 16:04705-1
27 Aug 2026, 11:54706+2
21 Aug 2026, 05:35704-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:18706no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:32706first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 04s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

369 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13837.4%
👍6718.2%
😁5715.4%
❤4512.2%
🤯369.76%
❤‍🔥154.07%
👏51.36%
⚡41.08%
🎄20.542%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2024 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @andrykotok. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 December 2024 to 3 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTC390 views35 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Раньше как-то на просторах интернета видел такую хуйню... Чувак показывает, что у него был ИИ-таргетолог в запрещёнке. Сам настраивал якобы рекламу, делал какой-то анализ — и результаты у него намного лучше, чем у кожаных. Ну и когда я посмотрел этот видос, подумал: откровенно говоря, че это за наёбалово 😁. Что такое невозможно. А оказалось — возможно… Нейронками на проф-уровне я занимаюсь уже, наверное, года по…

👍23❤6🔥5🎄1

1 Feb 2026, 15:07 UTC798 views43 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥28❤‍🔥7👍6😁2

1 Feb 2026, 15:07 UTC753 viewsread 8 August 2026

Можно слушать на х1.5 спокойно. Приятного прослушивания 🔥🔥 Нихуя я тут записал на 8 минут

26 Jan 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,010 views9 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

Ищу к себе в команду человека, который видит ритм, чувствует стиль и превращает видео в конфетку Нужен тот, кто умеет не просто резать и склеивать, а создавать вовлекающие рекламные креативы для онлайн-школы в сфере здоровья и красоты. ✅ Что ты будешь делать: • Монтаж рекламных видео и Reels/Shorts/TikTok-креативов • Создание роликов для англоязычной и испаноязычной аудитории • Работа с исходниками: съёмка, граф…

❤9

29 Jul 2025, 19:30 UTC≈1,800 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

БОЛЕЕ 250.000 ПОДПИСЧИКОВ В ЛИЧНЫЙ БЛОГ Просто с одного ролика можно набирать реально целенаправленно десятки тысяч подписчиков Прикиьнте, вот я скок себе говорил, что не хочу вот этим заниматься, и меня как то сюда занесло. Я же в основном запускал рекламу на конверсионные этапы, а тут набор подписчиков. Я примерно понимал, как вся эта петрушка выглядит, знал, что нужно делать, но что-то не особо горела свеча и …

❤14🔥11❤‍🔥7👍5

17 Jun 2025, 10:44 UTC≈1,750 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

😁😁😁 Шпагат был по сценарию Че щас можно делааааать то. Уже тестировали? Пробовали?

😁22🔥2

26 May 2025, 13:52 UTC≈2,090 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚠️ Важное для тех, кто работает с Meta-рекламой или рядом Я подключился к проекту, который даёт то, чего нет у 99% агентских кабинетов. Вот что ты получаешь: 🔹 Прямая поддержка от Meta через проект АЛО Да, внутри самой Меты. Никаких «напишите в саппорт» — живые люди, быстрые решения. 🔹 Безлимит по рекламным кабинетам Сколько надо — столько будет. Под любой объём. Нужно 1 млн $ – пажааалууйста 🔹 Минимум банов Тут…

❤9🔥4🤯1

19 May 2025, 16:49 UTC≈2,050 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я думал, что в FB рекламе каждый клик – это живой человек с горящими глазами и кошельком наготове. Наивный... (ебать я лох) Когда начал тщательно анализировать каждое взаимодействие, понял как нас тупо наебывали: 30-50% траффика – галимые боты! И это не мои домыслы – сама техподдержка FB прямым текстом подтверждает это. Да и не то что бы подтверждает, если сможешь аргументировать, то можно и возврат попросить. А …

🤯13😁6❤2❤‍🔥1🔥1

15 May 2025, 17:05 UTC≈1,570 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Совсем недавно стал свидетелем того, как покупали консультацию, где чувак раздавал советы по чату GPT Вам как бы такая консультация? Зашла бы? Может у кого то че то похожее было уже? 😁😁

😁11👍1

17 Feb 2025, 17:52 UTC≈2,070 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

$23019 ОНЛАЙН-ШКОЛЕ ИНОСТРАННЫХ ЯЗЫКОВ 🤝пост знакомство 📩Обсудить проект→ @Ramaxx8

🔥9

17 Feb 2025, 17:17 UTC≈1,760 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Это прям самый простой кейс, который когда либо я делал. Применим практически в любой нише. Но таким методом мало кто продвигается. 🤝пост знакомство 📩Обсудить проект→ @Ramaxx8

❤4🔥4👍1

1 Feb 2025, 14:44 UTC≈1,720 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

100 000 000₽ В НИШЕ ПРОФЕСИИ Это только полгода цифр. Там больше 100 000 000₽ мы занесли в кассу с платного трафика. Буду собирать еще цифры, и делиться кейсами. Так как с данным клиентом работаем по сей день. 🤝пост знакомство 📩Обсудить проект→ @Ramaxx8

🔥7👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @andrykotok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Илья Филиппов. Лаборатория нейросетей
@moremarketingisaid · 23,300
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Андрей Коток | Трафик для инфобиза” (@andrykotok), 702 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andrykotok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.