Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for • [Бар на краю мультивселенной] • (16+)

Channel

• [Бар на краю мультивселенной] • (16+)

@angels_haven

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

35subscribers

-128 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001969008637
TypeChannel
Username@angels_haven
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/angels_haven

Growth

21163929 August 2026 — 163 subscribers9 August 2026 — 163 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30 subscribers31 August 2026 — 31 subscribers9 September 2026 — 35 subscribers359 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net -128. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 21:0035+4
31 Aug 2026, 15:5431+1
24 Aug 2026, 13:4830+9
16 Aug 2026, 22:0621-142
9 Aug 2026, 20:21163no change
9 Aug 2026, 19:17163first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52669650599044912071437.8%
custom 5359394834878571815821.6%
custom 5217625424795820855718.9%
custom 5283233403884286855410.8%
custom 5350689030658864471410.8%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC20 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Что я понял по реакциям: 1. Одному челу не нравятся мои правила 2. Двоим не нравятся аппараты МРТ

custom 52669650599044912073

8 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC36 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Оборзел ли я? Возможно Правила на моих адоптов 1. Не отдавать в ловах 2. Не продавать дешевле затрат. Продавать за равную сумму можно 3. Для создания из моих дизайнов коммерческих видов (открытых или закрытых, не важно) необходимо подарить мне одну особь и в дальнейшем не присваивать себе авторство изначальной идеи 4. Не ставить своих правил При недовольстве правилами можно поговорить в лс

custom 53593948348785718155custom 53506890306588644713custom 52832334038842868552

8 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @yarmarkaaccentPhoto

Не всегда все складывается так, как ты хочешь Аукцион на черную массу Нач— 100 Мин— 1 Авто— 800 Конец через 24 часа ппс, рубли на сбер #ЯА_Аукцион #ЯА_Зейн

custom 52669650599044912072

8 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC40 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Расстрел отменяется, мне влом

7 Aug 2026, 22:22 UTC40 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я родил Завтра кину в шоп скорее всего

custom 52669650599044912076

7 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC39 viewsread 9 August 2026

Вы должны это видеть, это пиздец

7 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC24 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @WOFtriggerPhoto

В лавке админу уже кристально похуй че публиковать? Уже всем известно что по соо ходят боты и перезаливают посты с рекламой говнотреков Админу вообще поебать что чел точно не зейн и ниче в голове не щелкнуло что видит это уже во второй раз Ещё приписка снизу «любите острые блюда?» вот ну точно подозрений не вызывает #тейк ⌧ @TakesWOFtrigger_bot

custom 53593948348785718153

6 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC42 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Когда я сойду с ума, я никому не скажу, но знаки будут

custom 52832334038842868552

6 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC47 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Го вы напишите хэды на меня, основываясь на моем кинн листе?🤗

custom 52176254247958208554custom 53506890306588644711

6 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC44 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @puch000kPhoto

Тощем та, как говорила, каналу уже скоро год, давайте лоту на картинку любого формата😼 От полноценки (до 3 персов на одном арте) до рефа (наполнение обкашляем). Можете хоть скетч попросить идк Вам только надо подписаться и написать номер в коммы, усё, если хотите можете репоснуть куда-нибудь и получить доп номер (в комменты тогда ещё и скрин прилагайте) Итоги через месяц: 6 сентября :3 Удачи всем 😼🙏

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @angels_haven. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“• [Бар на краю мультивселенной] • (16+)” (@angels_haven), 35 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angels_haven.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.