Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ใ€๐Ÿใ€‘ใ€ใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒกใ€‘ใ€ใƒŸใƒผใƒ ใ€‘ใ€ใƒฌใƒใ€‘ใ€๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑโƒ ใ€‘ใ€๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆโƒ ใ€‘ใ€๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธโƒ ใ€‘

Channel

ใ€๐Ÿใ€‘ใ€ใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒกใ€‘ใ€ใƒŸใƒผใƒ ใ€‘ใ€ใƒฌใƒใ€‘ใ€๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑโƒ ใ€‘ใ€๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆโƒ ใ€‘ใ€๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธโƒ ใ€‘

@animemerepo

On this record: Topic ยท Previous handles ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

9,777subscribers

-124 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001376527483
TypeChannel
Username@animemerepo
DescriptionYour daily dose of anime meme and weeb degradation. Send your memes/feedback or ask for posting perms at @animemerepobot AMR Top Ten: https://t.me/animemerepo/84930 For more channels visit: @kindestchannels
Created8 September 2018 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/animemerepo

Topic

Other / unclassifiable โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as โ€œAnime Memes Repositoryโ€ โ€” the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third partyโ€™s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

9,7749,9309,8526 August 2026 โ€” 9,901 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 9,912 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 9,915 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 9,911 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 9,918 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 9,930 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 9,917 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 9,900 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 9,891 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 9,893 subscribers5 September 2026 โ€” 9,887 subscribers10 September 2026 โ€” 9,867 subscribers14 September 2026 โ€” 9,862 subscribers18 September 2026 โ€” 9,858 subscribers27 September 2026 โ€” 9,836 subscribers5 October 2026 โ€” 9,823 subscribers12 October 2026 โ€” 9,817 subscribers15 October 2026 โ€” 9,801 subscribers18 October 2026 โ€” 9,795 subscribers20 October 2026 โ€” 9,787 subscribers24 October 2026 โ€” 9,792 subscribers27 October 2026 โ€” 9,794 subscribers29 October 2026 โ€” 9,786 subscribers1 November 2026 โ€” 9,782 subscribers4 November 2026 โ€” 9,774 subscribers7 November 2026 โ€” 9,777 subscribers9,7776 August 20267 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 93 days, net -124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 9,751โ€“9,953 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 11:599,777+3
4 Nov 2026, 19:169,774-8
1 Nov 2026, 16:469,782-4
29 Oct 2026, 20:299,786-8
27 Oct 2026, 03:369,794+2
24 Oct 2026, 00:399,792+5
20 Oct 2026, 23:209,787-8
18 Oct 2026, 06:179,795-6
15 Oct 2026, 06:499,801-16
12 Oct 2026, 14:069,817-6
5 Oct 2026, 11:389,823-13
27 Sept 2026, 06:569,836-22
18 Sept 2026, 07:199,858-4
14 Sept 2026, 11:179,862-5
10 Sept 2026, 18:399,867-20
5 Sept 2026, 06:399,887-6
1 Sept 2026, 21:049,893+2
30 Aug 2026, 04:349,891-9
26 Aug 2026, 18:339,900-17
24 Aug 2026, 04:469,917first reading

Engagement

331 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
11.3%
avg views รท 9,777 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
73 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.46%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
73
of 331 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held331 (4 August 2026 โ€“ 7 November 2026)
Views total80,380
Reactions total2,779
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 22:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
โ‰ˆ80,700
Videos
โ‰ˆ7,300
Links
โ‰ˆ1,400

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 15s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

11,783 reactions across 314 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ˜ญ9,43280.0%
๐Ÿ‘8797.46%
๐Ÿฅฐ5925.02%
๐ŸŒญ3242.75%
โค3192.71%
๐Ÿ”ฅ630.535%
๐Ÿคฏ470.399%
๐Ÿ˜450.382%
๐Ÿคฉ280.238%
๐Ÿซก150.127%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ120.102%
๐Ÿ˜Ž120.102%
๐Ÿ’‹70.059%
๐Ÿ’ฏ50.042%
โœ10.008%
๐Ÿพ10.008%
๐Ÿ†10.008%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 329 of the 331 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 12,366 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 331 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 331 we hold a reading for ยท 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @animemerepo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 331 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegramโ€™s own โ€˜editedโ€™ marker: 1 of 73 posts held from the last 30 days (1.37%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 20:52 UTC404 views14 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ8๐Ÿ˜ญ3โค2๐ŸŒญ1

7 Nov 2026, 16:41 UTC818 views32 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜ญ27๐Ÿ‘3โค2

7 Nov 2026, 12:03 UTC901 views25 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿฅฐ23๐Ÿ”ฅ2

7 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC877 views45 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

โค30๐ŸŒญ9๐Ÿฅฐ6

7 Nov 2026, 02:10 UTCโ‰ˆ1,010 views42 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜ญ40๐ŸŒญ2

7 Nov 2026, 00:27 UTCโ‰ˆ1,020 views39 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐ŸŒญ21๐Ÿ˜ญ13๐Ÿ”ฅ3โค2

6 Nov 2026, 22:50 UTCโ‰ˆ1,030 views50 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜ญ48โค1๐Ÿ‘1

6 Nov 2026, 21:52 UTCโ‰ˆ1,090 views56 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜ญ53โค3

6 Nov 2026, 21:29 UTCโ‰ˆ1,060 views39 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿฅฐ25๐Ÿ˜ญ14

6 Nov 2026, 21:01 UTCโ‰ˆ1,070 views62 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜ญ42๐Ÿฅฐ15๐Ÿ‘5

6 Nov 2026, 20:18 UTCโ‰ˆ1,060 views21 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜ญ21

Showing the 12 most recent of 331 posts we hold for @animemerepo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Stonetoss
@stone_toss ยท 20,889
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 37 here โ€” alongside 36 others โ€” read 25 September 2026
/g/'s Tech Memes
@gentoomemes ยท 28,545
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 35 here โ€” alongside 34 others โ€” read 10 September 2026
Hacker News
@hackernewslive ยท 29,075
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 50 here โ€” alongside 49 others โ€” read 10 September 2026
Anime WebM
@animewebmtg ยท 22,565
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 45 here โ€” alongside 44 others โ€” read 19 September 2026
i don't know how to be funny anymore
@everyone ยท 79,127
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 41 here โ€” alongside 40 others โ€” read 13 September 2026
MOODiYA | MEMES
@moodiyatg ยท 40,893
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 51 here โ€” alongside 50 others โ€” read 30 August 2026
funny.mp4
@funny_mp4 ยท 25,232
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 50 here โ€” alongside 49 others โ€” read 14 September 2026
Fix Fox Stickers | Premium Emoji
@Fix_x_Fox ยท 51,848
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 67 here โ€” alongside 66 others โ€” read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œใ€๐Ÿใ€‘ใ€ใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒกใ€‘ใ€ใƒŸใƒผใƒ ใ€‘ใ€ใƒฌใƒใ€‘ใ€๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑโƒ ใ€‘ใ€๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆโƒ ใ€‘ใ€๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธโƒ ใ€‘โ€ (@animemerepo), 9,777 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/animemerepo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.