Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 4:30 переезд

Channel

4:30 переезд

@anip4300

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

76subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003877707715
TypeChannel
Username@anip4300
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anip4300

Growth

76114958 August 2026 — 111 subscribers9 August 2026 — 111 subscribers9 August 2026 — 113 subscribers17 August 2026 — 110 subscribers25 August 2026 — 114 subscribers1 September 2026 — 100 subscribers11 September 2026 — 76 subscribers8 August 202611 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 34 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70–120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 09:0176-24
1 Sept 2026, 18:24100-14
25 Aug 2026, 04:04114+4
17 Aug 2026, 14:06110-3
9 Aug 2026, 11:01113+2
9 Aug 2026, 06:47111no change
8 Aug 2026, 18:01111first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54336233072513780253829.2%
custom 54338478953862543593728.5%
custom 52244147802483346493526.9%
custom 54341265313895824942015.4%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anip4300. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC18 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

what would I like to see in my future home:

custom 543384789538625435910custom 54336233072513780259custom 52244147802483346497custom 54341265313895824945

8 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC26 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

есть ли тут люди, читающие манхвы? можете что-то посоветовать, чтобы вечером почитать?🩶

custom 54336233072513780254

8 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026

мне очень приятно, спасибо🥹🥹я всегда открыта к общению!

8 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026

Боже, вы такая хорошенькая, как с вами познакомиться 💔💔

8 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC33 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

у меня плохая память и из-за этого я плохо запоминаю ники людей. если мы с вами вдруг где-то встретились, КЛЯНУСЬ Я НЕ ХОТЕЛА ВАС ИГНОРИРОВАТЬ😭😭я просто вас не вспомнила

custom 52244147802483346497custom 54338478953862543596custom 54336233072513780253

7 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC38 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

все, всех репостнула, я молодец, теперь спать

custom 54336233072513780254custom 54338478953862543592

7 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC36 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

спасибо большое за звездочку!! вы мне сегодня прям звездопад устроили🥹🥹обнимаю!

custom 54338478953862543592custom 54341265313895824942

7 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC36 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

чем ближе осень, тем сильнее я расцветаю

custom 52244147802483346494custom 54338478953862543594custom 54341265313895824944custom 54336233072513780251

7 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC35 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

начало августа, я уже чувствую осень

custom 52244147802483346493custom 54336233072513780253custom 54341265313895824943custom 54338478953862543592

7 Aug 2026, 21:23 UTC37 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

для меня осень это не тёплый плед, не тыквенный латте, не прогулка в осеннем парке. для меня осень это холодный ливень, горячий кофе без сахара чтобы проснуться, долгие бесонные ночи, тяжелое одеяло. и именно такую осень я люблю

custom 54336233072513780254custom 54338478953862543593custom 54341265313895824943custom 52244147802483346492

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @anip4300. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“4:30 переезд” (@anip4300), 76 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anip4300.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.