Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анита🪐 Коды Жизни🧬

Channel

Анита🪐 Коды Жизни🧬

@anita_wonderland

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

221subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001273173306
TypeChannel
Username@anita_wonderland
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anita_wonderland

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2212232227 August 2026 — 223 subscribers7 August 2026 — 223 subscribers30 August 2026 — 221 subscribers8 September 2026 — 222 subscribers17 September 2026 — 221 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 41 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 221–223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 01:58221-1
8 Sept 2026, 17:39222+1
30 Aug 2026, 10:26221-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:47223no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:04223first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7655.9%
🔥3425.0%
custom 54654715634930417161410.3%
👍75.15%
✍32.21%
😁10.735%
😍10.735%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jun 2026, 13:47 UTC124 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А пока из актуального. Попалось видео на днях про одного из основателей psy2.0 - Михаила Филяева. Видео репостить не буду, потому что оно неприятное. Пару лет назад из-за моего отрицательного высказывания в сторону этой "школы" психологии, от меня отписалась и сильно обиделась одна из моих давних знакомых. Тогда речь была даже не про Филяева конкретно, я не следила за личным его проявлением, но мне несколько раз поп…

❤4✍3

29 Jun 2026, 13:45 UTC95 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хотела тут, но в итоге про роддом начала рассказывать в Инста. Надеюсь, ещё будет время текстом написать и сюда 🙌🏼 потому что роддом в Австрии шикарный! И точно стоит рассказа.

❤6😍1

10 Jun 2026, 14:34 UTC157 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Или большой♥️

❤15🔥13custom 54654715634930417168

10 Jun 2026, 14:32 UTC139 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У нас тут небольшой плановый перерыв в блоге 🤍 #ани_личное

❤18🔥8custom 54654715634930417166

8 Jun 2026, 16:25 UTC136 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥2😁1

8 Jun 2026, 16:23 UTC117 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤3🔥1

8 Jun 2026, 16:22 UTC109 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤3🔥2

22 May 2026, 16:48 UTC152 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Важный момент ещё расскажу - мы оооооочень часто пытаемся быть ровно в противоположности от того, что 'встроено' у нас☝🏼 Расскажу заодно, почему ТАК и ПОЧЕМУ так делать не надо😉

❤4👍3

22 May 2026, 16:47 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Привет, Анита! Я досмотрела сначала, а потом посмотрела, что у меня незакрашенный центр эго) буду ждать кружочки 😀

❤3

22 May 2026, 14:34 UTC129 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Маякните, кто досмотрел. И расскажу про неопределенное Эго. И как же ему зарабатывать и на что опираться

❤5🔥1

22 May 2026, 14:34 UTC121 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥2❤1

22 May 2026, 14:29 UTC99 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @anita_wonderland. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

СЕЙДР МА
@seidrma · 34,319
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анита🪐 Коды Жизни🧬” (@anita_wonderland), 221 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anita_wonderland.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.