Channel
@anitkamakeup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,278subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001642412123 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anitkamakeup |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anitkamakeup |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 1,278 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:35 | 1,283 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:19 | 1,284 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 1,288 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 1,294 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 1,298 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 1,303 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 1,311 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:21 | 1,315 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 1,316 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 1,316 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
327 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 218 | 66.7% | |
| custom 5203929968089768388 | 38 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5354834305459695883 | 35 | 10.7% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 6.73% | |
| custom 5442927619458747266 | 8 | 2.45% | |
| custom 5368300376552383003 | 4 | 1.22% | |
| custom 5391219112317822618 | 2 | 0.612% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📜📜📜📜📜📜 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎🌑🤩 В Имперском городе все не те, кем кажутся. Одни смотрят на мир чужими глазами и говорят чужим голосом, другие скрывают своё истинное лицо за искусно созданными масками. Но однажды все тайны выйдут на свет.
❤🔥11
📜📜📜📜📜📜 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎🌑🤩 Небо над нами и земля под ногами тому свидетели. С сегодняшнего дня мы сёстры. И в радости, и в страдании мы неразлучны.
❤🔥14
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤😎🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Юная вампирша оказывается связана сознанием с древним существом. Чтобы выжить, ей предстоит нарушить вековые традиции, а спустя двести лет столкнуться с последствиями своих выборов. Автор — Маришка. Проект разработан под кураторством Александра Д. Погрузитесь глубже в мир «Рождённой Луной»! Исследуйте жизнь вампиров в двух эпохах, раскройте новые тайны знакомой вселенной и познакомьте…
❤🔥18custom 53912191123178226182
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤😎🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Цена вечности — всё.
❤🔥9
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤😎🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Цена силы — страх.
❤🔥17
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤😎🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Цена власти — предательство.
❤🔥18
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤😎🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Цена бессмертия — кровь.
❤🔥16custom 53683003765523830034
Куда посоветуете двинуть?)) Я вам напомню, что у меня толком не пройдена даже прошлая обнова 😏
😁22
Ох уж эти подарочкииииии 🥺
custom 520392996808976838831custom 54429276194587472663
Кстати за всё своё путешествие я прочла всего одну книгу 🌝 Но рада что меня сопровождало именно классическое произведение Анны Бронте «Незнакомка из Уайлдфелл-Холла» 📚 Я осталась в полнейшем восторге от романа 😍 Несмотря на то, что я растянула прочтение на 20 дней, мне ни на секунду не ставало скучно и я совсем не теряла интереса, как это периодически может происходить с такого рода книгами 🥺 Иногда голова немного …
❤🔥17
Ещё чуть чуть поделюсь с вами красотой моей Армении 🥺🇦🇲
❤🔥41custom 54429276194587472661
Я вернулась с отпуска 🤍
custom 535483430545969588335❤🔥18custom 54429276194587472663
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @anitkamakeup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ANITA MAKEUP 💄” (@anitkamakeup), 1,278 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anitkamakeup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.