Channel
@anli
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
6,582subscribers
-4,694 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002633579898 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @anli @meigong @sheji @zppgg |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 39 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anli |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 6,582 | -29 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 6,611 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 6,616 | -2,176 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 8,792 | -113 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 8,905 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 8,909 | -118 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 9,027 | -385 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 9,412 | -113 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 9,525 | -320 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 9,845 | -94 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 9,939 | -152 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 10,091 | -93 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 10,184 | -66 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 10,250 | -173 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 10,423 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 10,423 | -160 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 10,583 | -49 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 10,632 | -50 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 10,682 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 10,682 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 19 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (19 September 2025 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,377 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
七天担保牛逼 --能说出这句话，证明我没什么学历 如果我有文化，我会用更华丽的辞藻去称赞七天担保 很早就知道七天担保 如今飞机担保很多 但是做的知名的信誉的很少 七天担保就是其中一个 再说我自己 我高中毕业 自学美工 从什么都不会 到现在什么都会一点 从刚开始只会套模板改字 到现在 logo 头像 海报 都信手捏来 每天都在学习 每天都在进步 到后来客户越来越多 我也越来越担心 自己技术不是不够好 这张图配色是不是不显眼 重点是不是不够突出 所以每一张图我都做的很用心 所以很慢 --什么事都想做好才是最大的限制 七天担保的logo 我做的很慢 拖到最后一天才交稿 但是大家还是给了我相当大的鼓励 让我获得了第二名 谢谢大家 我会再接再厉 在此更要祝七天担保 越办越牛逼 让我们的纸飞机，永远飞在暗网与链上的最前沿。 @qtdb
玩加拿大2.8输了100多W 急出： 手机号: +888 0000 0060 13万U +888 0003 1313 1.5万U 已出 用户名： @anli 案例 3万U @meigong 美工 1.6万U @sheji 设计 1.8万U @aiwuhui （爱无悔）118 @kabei （卡贝）888 @nanhuo （南火） 118 @dangtuo （当拖）188 @tuoer （托尔）388 @wohaoaini （我好爱你）88 @rongtai （融泰）188 @kehubu （客户部）88 @tuyang （图样）188 @paiban （排版）1888 @lunbo （轮播）1888 礼物： PEPE #607 1.2万 PEPE #263 1.…
Channel name was changed to «案例»
@PAIPAIGPT_bot 自助开通GPT会员
今天你要体验的人生副本是《九博PG电子的万倍爆奖》
今天你要体验的人生副本是《用1000块生活费，在腾博会实现A7资产的一生》
今天你要体验的人生副本是《打造TG最大拍卖群》
今天你要体验的人生副本是《被商k毁掉的我》
今天你要体验的人生副本是《TG汇旺的落幕》
飞机第一美工，口碑即是实力！ 😤😤😤😤😤😤😤😤😤😤 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 😄 经典设计·完美创意 😄 易记用户名派派 @paipai 四字 @PSPS 设计 @sheji 接NFT抵押 10万U以内 月息3% 秒放款 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 😄客户须知 美工与设计师的价值 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 😄美工是执行指令😄设计是制定策略 😄美工会消耗成本😄设计会构建资产 😄美工为交付买单😄设计为结果负责 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 😄点击下方按钮可以查看作品😄 贴纸设计 自助开通GPT会员
飞机第一美工，口碑即是实力！ 😤😤😤😤😤😤😤😤😤😤 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 😄 经典设计·完美创意 😄 易记四字用户名 @PSPS 设计师集合 设计 @sheji 价格表 psps.ton AI做图 @zpsps_bot 接NFT抵押 10万U以内 月息3% 秒放款 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 😄客户须知 美工与设计师的价值 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 😄美工是执行指令😄设计是制定策略 😄美工会消耗成本😄设计会构建资产 😄美工为交付买单😄设计为结果负责
1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣—1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣ 游戏机器人：@feitou（👈点击进入） 正版厂商 · 盘总首选 · 商会保障 · 大额无忧 飞投娱乐 · 妈祖庇佑 · 商会护航 · 一起玩赢 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ U充U提不限iP 多重炸裂活动持续上线 官方频道每天发6个红包 游戏多福利好 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣：@fjsh 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣：@usdb 🐋🐋🐋🐋： fjsh.com 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣：@feitou
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @anli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@anli edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 339,569 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“案例” (@anli), 6,582 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.