Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Слово не воробей❄️

Channel

Слово не воробей❄️

@anna_ru0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

149subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002180752832
TypeChannel
Username@anna_ru0
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anna_ru0

Growth

1451531498 August 2026 — 145 subscribers8 August 2026 — 145 subscribers15 August 2026 — 152 subscribers28 August 2026 — 153 subscribers5 September 2026 — 149 subscribers8 August 20265 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 28 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144–154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 05:37149-4
28 Aug 2026, 03:16153+1
15 Aug 2026, 17:35152+7
8 Aug 2026, 21:01145no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:15145first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53818193358723714592454.5%
custom 5276202443636500261613.6%
💘613.6%
custom 5399821824437540777511.4%
24.55%
👍12.27%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC17 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Благодарю всех, кто проголосовал, а то меня бро съел бы попросил это сделать, хах

custom 53998218244375407773custom 52762024436365002611

8 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @NebozhielPoll

Новый опросик (Ибо в прошлом нельзя поменять выбор)

  1. В стиле "гача" 🫗15%
  2. Полностью отрисовать 🦪47%
  3. Хочу что бы в комиксе были отрисованные моменты так и моменты имеющие гача стиль 🫙38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 53998218244375407772custom 53818193358723714591

5 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC29 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩❤️ У вас есть идеи, которые вы бы хотели реализовать по вашему любимому пейрингу? Но нет времени или желания писать? — Предлагаю вам написать пожелания по дальнейшим фанфикам в комментариях или у меня в лс (@Ru_isAnna) Работаю в основном с фандомами и пейрингами, что можете вы увидеть на просторах моего тгк. Но если вам интересно и просто лень искать, то оставлю в комментариях сообщение со списком моих фанд

custom 53818193358723714593

4 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC40 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Смотрите! Это мне моя жена нарисовала, божечки ❤❤❤😭 Спасибо ей, и с днём рождения ещё раз, хаха 💋 #авапал #винкс #жена #арт

custom 53818193358723714595custom 52762024436365002612

2 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC52 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53818193358723714594custom 52762024436365002613

31 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC65 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новые фоточки за эти дни🥰 Завтра, наконец-то, домой🥳 #путешествие #брянскаяобласть

💘4custom 53818193358723714593

30 Jul 2026, 22:07 UTC54 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Муся, и этим все сказано #путешествие #муся #брянскаяобласть

💘2custom 53818193358723714592

29 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC50 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мои попытки рисовать без всего, только карандашом (больше ничего и нет у меня) 😅 #путешествие #скетч #брянскаяобласть

custom 538181933587237145962👍1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @anna_ru0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTCFinal Results100 voters

Новый опросик (Ибо в прошлом нельзя поменять выбор)

  1. В стиле "гача" 🫗15%
  2. Полностью отрисовать 🦪47%
  3. Хочу что бы в комиксе были отрисованные моменты так и моменты имеющие гача стиль 🫙38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Слово не воробей❄️” (@anna_ru0), 149 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anna_ru0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.