Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анна Валл

Channel

Анна Валл

@anna_vall

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,707subscribers

+3,521 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002050732356
TypeChannel
Username@anna_vall
DescriptionФилолог, специалист по культуре речи, консультант по этикету и коммуникации клиники «Три сестры». С любопытством и любовью к речевому общению. Приходите общаться!
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/anna_vall

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1869,7077,946.56 August 2026 — 6,186 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,186 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,201 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,323 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,418 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,493 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,576 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,663 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,706 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,040 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,345 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,679 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,848 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,961 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,298 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,537 subscribers10 October 2026 — 8,925 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,149 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,300 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,357 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,466 subscribers25 October 2026 — 9,557 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,601 subscribers31 October 2026 — 9,664 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,707 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net +3,521. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,658–10,235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 01:199,707+43
31 Oct 2026, 15:279,664+63
28 Oct 2026, 14:499,601+44
25 Oct 2026, 21:599,557+91
23 Oct 2026, 06:189,466+109
20 Oct 2026, 12:099,357+57
17 Oct 2026, 14:189,300+151
14 Oct 2026, 08:409,149+224
10 Oct 2026, 21:228,925+388
5 Oct 2026, 00:418,537+239
26 Sept 2026, 00:578,298+337
15 Sept 2026, 11:587,961+113
11 Sept 2026, 18:177,848+169
6 Sept 2026, 23:577,679+334
2 Sept 2026, 02:357,345+305
30 Aug 2026, 01:417,040+334
26 Aug 2026, 19:566,706+43
23 Aug 2026, 20:046,663+87
19 Aug 2026, 20:236,576+83
16 Aug 2026, 16:236,493first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 5 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.2%
avg views ÷ 9,707 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,650
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held40 (5 April 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total56,490
Reactions total2,602
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 21:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
75
Videos
3
Links
26

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 46s
Average length
3m 46s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,154 reactions across 38 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7,24659.6%
🔥9477.79%
👍9297.64%
❤‍🔥6625.45%
💔4313.55%
😁2992.46%
💯2672.20%
🙏2051.69%
🕊1991.64%
👏1921.58%
🤣1821.50%
🥰1441.18%
😢670.551%
😍590.485%
🤔530.436%
💘460.378%
🤩440.362%
🤗330.272%
⚡300.247%
🤝240.197%
18 further kinds950.782%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC≈2,370 views86 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Друзья, спасибо за ответы — все важны и нужны, и, кажется, не скоро этот вопрос будет закрыт. Гештальт всегда со мною) А теперь прошу о совершенно другом: помогите мне, пожалуйста, —через два рукопожатия или сарафанное радио — продать мою квартиру в Петербурге. Если вдруг (!) кто-то отзовётся, то прошу написать в личное сообщение @anna_vall или WhatsApp (+7 921-947-41-87). Буду очень благодарна.

❤57🔥15👍10🤔3🤓1

27 Oct 2026, 14:49 UTC≈4,950 views120 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Друзья! Добрый день! Участвую в сборе мнений для статьи о том, как люди узнают тексты, написанные нейросетью, и очень нужна ваша помощь. Два вопроса: (1) По каким признакам вы понимаете, что текст писал ИИ? (кроме длинного тире) (2) Что для вас меняется, когда вы это поняли или заподозрили? Дочитываете, начинаете меньше верить, бросаете, ничего не меняется? Ответ оставьте, пожалуйста, в комментариях. Можно голосо…

🔥57❤55👏7🤓1

24 Oct 2026, 10:48 UTC≈5,850 views62 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Или тут https://rutube.ru/video/2f32315a49d4a73cb2eb7e22e0b2d3f0/

❤43❤‍🔥8👍4🥰4🤗2👏1

24 Oct 2026, 10:47 UTC≈5,160 views88 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Вдруг выдастся маленькое тихое время на отвлечённое знание для отвлечения от реального https://youtu.be/wYtiEaqBqGs

❤61🥰14❤‍🔥10🤗2👏1

20 Oct 2026, 06:10 UTC≈7,020 views111 reactionsread 5 November 2026

А вот образец идеального взаимоотношения живого интеллекта с искусственным. Наслаждайтесь! Благодарю Александра Борисовича, автора. https://dzen.ru/a/atPoumDX1lL6TtiP?share_to=link

❤63👍24🙏10🔥9🥰4👏1

19 Oct 2026, 10:26 UTC≈5,550 views427 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Пёрышко хотело стать дельфином, но не получилось. Но оно пыталось и ни о чём не жалеет.

❤255🔥71🥰30🕊26😁19🤗10👍9🙏4

13 Oct 2026, 06:09 UTC≈7,420 views216 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

В этот раз разговор может принести пользу не только тем, кто в нём участвует. Я участвую в благотворительном аукционе Meet For Charity. Победитель сможет встретиться со мной, а средства от нашей встречи пойдут на помощь подопечным фонда «Милосердие детям». На встрече не будет лекции. И экзамена на грамотность тоже не будет — обещаю! Будет разговор. Можно поговорить о речи и этикете, публичных выступлениях и перепи…

❤153👏32🥰18👍9😍2🤓1🙏1

12 Oct 2026, 11:00 UTC≈6,460 views249 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Человеку рядом плохо Мы обычно почему-то решаем это за него. Подходим, когда человеку хочется побыть одному. Или, наоборот, деликатно «не вмешиваемся», когда помощь была бы очень кстати. В «Трех сестрах» я каждый день захожу к пациентам, которым тяжело. И у меня есть один вопрос на такой случай. Очень простой. И, кажется, ни разу я не видела, чтобы он вызвал агрессию. В подкасте я сказала: «Мы общество, которое пл…

❤164🔥51🕊21👍12🤓1

11 Oct 2026, 19:23 UTC≈6,040 views590 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Если бы я была школьным учителем, я бы завтра дала своим ученикам (от маленьких пятиклассников до выпускников) задание написать сочинение от лица осеннего листа. Его весну, лето, осень. И мечты и представления о зиме, морозе, снеге. О жизни за пределами. А тем ученикам, которые и к музыкальной школе привлечены, сочинить любую (нелепую) миниатюру «Времена года листА». Если бы!🤣

❤354👍113🔥44🥰41👏19😁7🤗5❤‍🔥4

11 Oct 2026, 18:48 UTC≈5,670 views653 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Кленовый букет. Тихий, умирающий, совершенный

❤379❤‍🔥114👍60😍41🔥27🕊11💔9🤗7

5 Oct 2026, 15:13 UTC≈8,230 views576 reactionsread 5 November 2026

К слову о речи Иногда самое вежливое, что мы можем сделать в разговоре, — не помогать человеку говорить. Не договаривать за него. Не торопить. Не заполнять паузу из лучших побуждений. Не делать вид, что паузы вообще не существует. А просто — слушать. Мы очень любим хорошую речь. Быструю, гладкую, уверенную. Но ведь цель разговора — не продемонстрировать безупречность речи. Цель в том, чтобы один человек смог сказать…

❤371❤‍🔥103💘32💯24👍21🔥20🤝2👎1

21 Sept 2026, 15:33 UTC≈8,780 views474 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

«Краденое солнце» К.И.Чуковского. Фотоиллюстрация. (21.09.2026. Подмосковье) Не нарочно. Не придумано.

❤276👍83🔥52🤩31😁11💔9🕊7👏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @anna_vall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анна Валл” (@anna_vall), 9,707 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anna_vall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.