🔴Артем,8 лет Диагноз:Аутизм Жалобы при обращении: ❌Страх новых мест ❌Произносит не полностью слова ❌Слабый зрительный контакт ❌Отсутствие учебного поведения ❌Частичная имитация ❌Полевое поведение ❌Плачет от криков других детей ❌Страх закрытой комнаты ❌Агрессия (щипается) ❌Слабая мелкая моторика ❌Слабая крупная моторика ❌Слабое понимание речи ❌Нет обращенной речи ❌Речь представлена эхолалией ✅Результат работы на ин…

Channel
Анна Гудзенко Мир по-другому
@annaguddzenko
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,098subscribers
-129 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001621270056 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @annaguddzenko |
| Description | 💛 Авторская методика реабилитации (Аутизм, РАС, ЗПРР, ЗРР, СДВГ и др.) Выход на нормотипичный путь развития 💛 Автор книг "Мир по-другому" и "Практическая инклюзия" 💛 Обучение методике https://methodgudzenko.ru/ 💛@annaguddzenko_chat - чат для общения |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/annaguddzenko |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:32 | 6,098 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:25 | 6,106 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:41 | 6,105 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:07 | 6,106 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:08 | 6,108 | -6 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:50 | 6,114 | -1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:41 | 6,115 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 00:14 | 6,118 | -8 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 15:20 | 6,126 | -10 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 06:57 | 6,136 | +2 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 6,134 | -12 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 6,146 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 6,156 | -6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 6,162 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 6,170 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 6,181 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 6,189 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 6,191 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:49 | 6,193 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 6,196 | first reading |
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.67%
- avg views ÷ 6,098 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 163
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.74%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (29 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,414 |
| Reactions total | 78 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 16:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,890
- Videos
- ≈1,850
- Links
- ≈1,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 16m
- Average length
- 4m 25s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
177 reactions across 36 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 85 | 48.0% | |
| 🔥 | 56 | 31.6% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 19.8% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.565% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (47.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴ДЕТСКИЙ САД ДЛЯ РЕБЕНКА С ОВЗ❓ 👉Эфир тема: Социализация особенного ребёнка 👉Эфир тема: «Комплексное развитие детей с ОВЗ» ➡️Как компенсировать задержку крупной и мелкой моторики в домашних условиях❓ ➡️Как составить индивидуальную комплексную программу развития для своего ребенка самостоятельно ❓ ➡️Как запустить речь дома без специалистов❓ ➡️Как работать с полевым поведением и социализировать ребенка с ОВЗ❓ Гото…
❤4
28 октября я приняла участие в международной конференции на тему «Современные коррекционные технологии в специальной педагогике». Организатором конференции выступил университет ALFRAGANUS UNIVERSITY – ZAMONAVIY TA'LIM VA SHARQONA TARBIYA UYG'UNLIGI, Узбекистан, город: Ташкент. В конференции участвовали логопеды, олигофренопедагоги, студенты кафедры специальной педагогики и учителя. В своём выступлении я познакомила…
🔥7❤3👍2
🔴ПРЯМОЙ ЭФИР Тема: «Физическое развитие и формирование необходимых моторных навыков» Вы педагог, тренер, инструктор, работающий с детьми или просто родитель, но не знаете с какой стороны подойти к ребёнку с особенностями? С такими как: 🔵 Гиперактивность 🔵 Дефицит внимания 🔵 Агрессия/самоагрессия 🔵 Задержка речи и т.д. Этот вебинар для вас! 6 НОЯБРЯ в 19:00 по МСК в моем канале ВК⬇️ https://vk.ru/anna.guddzenk…
👍3
🔴ВНИМАНИЕ РОЗЫГРЫШ БЕСПЛАТНАЯ ДИАГНОСТИКА И 4 МЕСЯЦА СОПРОВОЖДЕНИЯ В ПОДАРОК Программа будет составляться на основе моей методики и будет полностью закрывать потребность в следующих специалистах: ❤️Логопед ❤️Дефектолог ❤️Нейропсихолог ❤️Специалист по сенсорной интеграции ❤️Тренер по ЛФК ❤️Педагог-психолог ❤️АВА-терапист УСЛОВИЯ ⬇️ ➡️ 1.Сделать репост поста (закрепленного в аккаунте Анны Гудзенко vk.c…
❤3
🔴Упражнение «пальцевый захват» Следующим этапом после освоения кистевого захвата (захвата всей кистью), мы переходим на отработку пальцевого захвата. Здесь мы также можем использовать уже полюбившиеся всем бельевые прищепки. В данном варианте упражнения мы решаем сразу 3 следующие задачи: ➡️Скручивание корпуса - важный крупно-моторный навык, который упражняет координацию в пространстве, укреплению вертикали…
❤4
🔴Алессандро, 12 лет Диагноз: Аутизм Жалобы при обращении: ❌не умеет одеваться/раздеваться ❌нет навыков гигиены ❌пищевая избирательность, скудный рацион ❌нет обращенной речи ❌нет фразовой речи ❌спит в памперсе ❌слабо развиты крупная, мелкая моторика ❌Не засыпает самостоятельно Результат работы по методике за 1 год: Бытовые навыки⬇️ ✅избавились от памперсов, сам ходит в туалет ночью ✅освоил навыки гигиены- умывается…
🔥11
🔴Можно ли проводить коррекционную работу при психомоторном возбуждении? ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ОТКРЫТА ЗАПИСЬ 📆 на ИНТЕНСИВЫ 4️⃣ НЕДЕЛИ ИНТЕНСИВНОЙ РАБОТЫ СО МНОЙ И МОИМИ СПЕЦИАЛИСТАМИ ➡️Запуск речи ➡️Физическое развитие ➡️Сенсорная интеграция ➡️Коммуникация ➡️Бытовые навыки ➡️Подготовка к школе ➡️Скалодром 20 дней по 3 часа интенсивной работы со специалистами+ 1 час скалодр…
👍5
❗️❗️❗️ 🔴Тема: «Освоение новых навыков у детей с нарушениями развития.» ЗАПИСЬ ПРЯМОГО ЭФИРА 🎥 Запись сохранили специально для вас! ❤️ Приятного просмотра! ОПУБЛИКОВАН В МОЕМ КАНАЛЕ МАХ ⬇️ ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 👉Мой канал в социальной сети МАХ ЖДУ ВАШЕ МНЕНИЕ ⬇️ ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 👉Мой чат в МАХ Запись сохранили специально для Вас #МетодикаГудзенко_Эфир #ВебинарГудзенко
🔴Пешеходный переход Правила безопасного передвижения по улицам населенных пунктов - важнейший этап социализации. Естественно, прежде, чем приступить к их освоению, необходимо устранить «полевое» поведение, если оно имеет место (бежать без остановки не понимания куда, не глядя и не слыша никого). Как это сделать я подробно рассказываю в блоке сенсорной интеграции раздел «Зрительный анализатор». Как только ребено…
👍3
Музыкальные и танцевальные занятия - обязательная часть моей методики и на интенсивах, а также для школьников, они проходят в групповом формате. Для многих детей этот опыт оказывается первым, но постепенно они включаются в работу и показывают прекрасные результаты. И все потому, что во-первых, у нас очень правильно и комплексно проработанна программа занятий, а во-вторых, мы их не развлекаем и не заигрываем с ними…
🔥5
🔴ДИАГНОСТИКА+СОПРОВОЖДЕНИЕ Программа будет составляться на основе моей методики и будет полностью закрывать потребность в следующих специалистах: 💚Логопед 💚Дефектолог 💚Нейропсихолог 💚Специалист по сенсорной интеграции 💚Тренер по ЛФК 💚Педагог-психолог 💚АВА-терапист Что проработаем: ➡️Коммуникация: ✔️Речь (начиная с полного ее отсутствия до свободной) ✔️Взаимодействие с другими, сотрудничество Игра ➡️Поведение: …
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @annaguddzenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@semichenkov_academy · 20,893
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 24 September 2026
@planetamed · 34,939
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
@Kateandbogdan_new · 81,259
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Гудзенко Мир по-другому” (@annaguddzenko), 6,098 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annaguddzenko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.