Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 85 days, net +95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,504–7,643 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Oct 2026, 04:28
7,627
+13
28 Oct 2026, 01:20
7,614
+20
25 Oct 2026, 08:20
7,594
+4
22 Oct 2026, 02:50
7,590
+3
18 Oct 2026, 13:48
7,587
-4
15 Oct 2026, 12:06
7,591
+2
12 Oct 2026, 03:02
7,589
+11
5 Oct 2026, 21:58
7,578
+17
28 Sept 2026, 21:37
7,561
+15
18 Sept 2026, 18:00
7,546
+10
14 Sept 2026, 08:36
7,536
-5
10 Sept 2026, 20:00
7,541
+5
6 Sept 2026, 05:38
7,536
+7
1 Sept 2026, 21:26
7,529
-1
29 Aug 2026, 15:14
7,530
-2
26 Aug 2026, 21:43
7,532
-7
23 Aug 2026, 21:04
7,539
+12
20 Aug 2026, 03:24
7,527
+7
16 Aug 2026, 20:52
7,520
-4
13 Aug 2026, 13:06
7,524
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 02s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,081 reactions across 40 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
729
23.7%
😁
537
17.4%
🔥
474
15.4%
❤
456
14.8%
🤣
294
9.54%
🥰
133
4.32%
😢
54
1.75%
💯
44
1.43%
🍌
38
1.23%
🤔
38
1.23%
👏
33
1.07%
✍
28
0.909%
🤓
26
0.844%
💋
20
0.649%
😍
20
0.649%
🤷♂
20
0.649%
😈
19
0.617%
😎
19
0.617%
🤗
15
0.487%
👎
13
0.422%
19 further kinds
71
2.30%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,081 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 40 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @annalukianovacanal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Моя знакомая познакомилась на Pure с мужчиной 37 лет. Он развелся за две недели до свидания. Вернее, подал заявление на развод. И на момент знакомства уже знатно куролесил: пил, курил траву и занимался сексом с женщинами, каждый день с новой. Секс у них случился фееричный. Девушка была голодной и сама пыталась "залечить" разрыв с бывшим. Они почти не спали, в перерывах между сексом ели, курили траву и выпивали. В ито…
Вдарим анекдотами в четверг!😊
Врач удивлённо рассматривает оранжевый член пациента.
-У вас в роду такое у кого-нибудь было?
- Нет
- А может вы на каком-нибудь вредном производстве работаете?
- Не-а
- А чем вы вообще занимаетесь?
- Сижу дома... смотрю порнуху... ем чипсы!
-------------------------------------
-Ты замужем?
- Конечно!
- Ну, и как?
- Да как в детстве: до поздна не гуляй, с чужими дяденькми не общайся!
-…
А знали ли вы, что ещё 6 лет назад существовала премия за худшее описание секса в литературе?
Bad Sex in Fiction Awards впервые вручили в 1993 году. Рассматривали произведения только серьёзных писателей. Среди номинантов вы не встретите авторов эротической или порнографической прозы. В течение года редакторы выбирали подходящие книги, готовили шорт-лист, потом объявляли несчастного победителя.
Примеры.
Джонатан Литт…
Встретилась с одним знакомым и узнала интересную вещь!👍
Оказывается, в салонах эротического массажа некоторые мастерицы жанра доводят мужчину до кульминации при помощи...шеи!
Девушка зажимает пенис между шеей и плечом.
Мой собеседник сказал, что по ощущениям это вроде минета.
Я тут же попробовала такое провернуть со своим парнем!
Зажать получилось, но двигаться было неудобно, пока я не обнаружила, что сподручнее, ког…
Он не хочет новых отношений | Как выйти из френдзоны (подкаст, выпуск №112)
В новом выпуске подкаста отвечу на два вопроса:
🔹 в первой части расскажу, что делать, если девушке приятно с мужчиной, но он не хочет начинать отношения;
🔹 а во второй — как вести себя молодому человеку, если он оказался во френдзоне у той, к кому есть чувства.
👉 Слушать выпуск подкаста на блоге
Письмо от девушки:
Он не хочет новых отно…
Конечно, у меня в каждом городе России и ближайшего зарубежья есть горячие дамочки, готовые заняться сексом с совершенно незнакомым мужчиной по моей просьбе!
Вы думаете, это единичный случай? Нет. Время от времени получаю такие запросы. Мужчины понимают, что заняться сексом со мной - шансов немного, но у меня ведь есть подружки, похожие на меня! 😁
😁70👍31❤16🤣14👏5⚡2🤔2👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @annalukianovacanal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие запреты от своей женщины вы считаете обоснованными?
Запрет на мастурбацию под порно6%
Запрет на переписку с другими женщинами19%
Запрет на танцы и флирт "вживую" с другими женщинами18%
Запрет на секс с другими женщинами45%
Запрет на все, что причинит ей боль41%
Все запреты считаю необоснованными16%
Я девушка, хочу увидеть результаты13%
The shares total 158%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Девушки, что вы предпочтете при прочих равных? Один большой член или два маленьких?😊
Один большой10%
Два маленьких11%
Я мужчина, у меня большой...70%
Я мужчина, у меня очень большой...9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Канал Анны Лукьяновой” (@annalukianovacanal), 7,627 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annalukianovacanal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.