Channel
@annaxeptable
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
125subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002804337433 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @annaxeptable |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/annaxeptable |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 125 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 121 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 117 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 112 | +10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 102 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 102 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
225 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5222390991658432217 | 54 | 24.0% | |
| custom 5219787713196080426 | 46 | 20.4% | |
| custom 5222325171284622461 | 29 | 12.9% | |
| custom 5220153683064404942 | 26 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5222311371554700374 | 23 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5222070861976059525 | 22 | 9.78% | |
| custom 5404854933402965409 | 12 | 5.33% | |
| custom 5219990229494023274 | 8 | 3.56% | |
| custom 5404625453300339342 | 4 | 1.78% | |
| custom 5222051070766758877 | 1 | 0.444% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 225 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
так,ну у меня залетел тикток и сюда набегают новые сладенькие подписчики,чему я очень рада Всем новеньким привет!!! я получила примерно 3-4 комментария о том,что люди хотят увидеть как я выгляжу. я не могу игнорировать такой огромный запрос так что ловите парочку моих фоточек в комменты и скетчики моей соны
custom 522015368306440494213custom 52199902294940232746custom 52223113715547003745custom 52197877131960804261
последней работе мне чего-то сильно не хватало, я помнила, что должна была добавить что-то ещё, но забыла. Потом забила, подумав, что если забыла, значит, это неважно.... теперь все устраивает ахахах
custom 522232517128462246114custom 52223909916584322179custom 52197877131960804267custom 52201536830644049422custom 52220510707667588771
решила закончить свой скетч и забыла увеличить размер,так что ужасно шакальное качество. это меня расстраивает,так как мне очень нравится что получилось ну ладно че поделать
custom 540485493340296540912custom 522207086197605952510custom 52223909916584322176custom 52197877131960804264custom 52223251712846224611
annaxeptable pinned «Кирибан на 100 подписчиков 💋»
Кирибан на 100 подписчиков 💋
custom 522239099165843221714custom 52223251712846224618custom 52201536830644049424
Pause oc challenge
custom 521978771319608042614custom 522231137155470037411custom 54046254533003393424
малюсеньки быстрый скетч для одной из моих муз 💋 у меня чет все из рук валится, не рисуется. резко сил не стало как вернулась домой ахаха
custom 521978771319608042618custom 52201536830644049427custom 52223251712846224613custom 52223909916584322171
такь,я вернулась из отпуска планов много,буду много рисовать но пока чет не получается ахаха держите коровку которую нарисовала в поезде хотела почистить ее,сделать полностью дидж..но чет расхотелось
custom 522239099165843221715custom 52223113715547003747custom 52199902294940232742custom 52197877131960804261
Других художников тоже порепощу сегодня,но позже А пока покажу вот всякое чему не суждено быть законченным скорее всего. Лайф апдейт: я в отпуске,в своем родном регионе. Горящая путевочка 🥹 пережили атаку на нефтехранилище у моего дома(буквально видно с моего окна, расстояние максимум километр-полтора). Словами не описать пережитое,кручу это в голове нонстопом. Немного отпустило уже,но все же некоторый малюююсенький …
custom 522207086197605952512custom 52223251712846224613custom 52223909916584322173custom 52197877131960804261
мазня говном #PortfolioDay
custom 52223909916584322176
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @annaxeptable. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“annaxeptable” (@annaxeptable), 125 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annaxeptable.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.