开课了头课可约

Channel
安妮🌈🌈
@annini117
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
151subscribers
+96 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004337548035 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @annini117 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/annini117 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 151 | +52 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:22 | 99 | no change |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:42 | 99 | +44 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:47 | 55 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 5 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 158.7%
- avg views ÷ 151 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 240
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.178%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (5 September 2026 – 10 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,835 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
有空
今天约🈵️了可以预约明天
【时间】:2026-09-08 【老师】:安妮 【留名】:詹森 【人照】:8.5 【颜值】:9 【身材】:8.8 【服务】:9.5 【课费】:工兵 【环境】:9.5 【综合】:9.06 【过程】:老师和榜上视频挺像的,挺可爱的一个小妹妹。服务就是课表那些,陪浴,舔咪咪口69 ,口活挺深的。老师身材微肉,抱起来很舒服,奶子大屁股大。 值得一提的是做爱很舒服,真的很舒服,逼又紧有浅,每一下都能感觉暴击。老师话少,但是很有耐心。做爱时候自己会调整姿势,不催不事,我反正挺满意的。 【优点】:做爱舒服,配合,嫩,有耐心 【缺点】:纹身比较多
【时间】:2026-09-08 【老师】:安妮 【留名】:野谷生春 【人照】:8.5 【颜值】:8.5 【身材】:8.5 【服务】:9 【课费】:6 【环境】:9 【综合】:8.7 【过程】:妹子照片美颜了本人七八分像,态度很好很客气爱笑,有问必答。声音沙哑,有培浴,脱衣服后熊非常大奶头粉嫩,身上纹身比较多,身材微胖有小肚子。床上可以随便你摸和亲也有蛇,69。 姿势配合,口活尚可。 【优点】:奶子大,态度很好,舌吻够 【缺点】:无
有空
【时间】:2026-09-08 【老师】:安妮 【留名】:江南不再深情 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:8 【服务】:8 【态度】:9 【环境】:8 【综合】:8.5 【过程】:人照差不多,真人好看点。有些许纹身,身材匀称,稍微有点肉,皮肤偏黄,有陪浴,舌吻自然,厚嘴唇蛇起来带感,69无异味,口鸡鸡新手水平。会女上,摇起来受不了。阴毛正常,小学紧致,九曲十八弯,传教士舒服,后入被秒。
❤1
🈳~
开课头课还在
有🈳️
开课了
【时间】:2026-09-06 【老师】:安妮 【留名】:柚子哥中环 【人照】:8.5 【态度】:9.5 【环境】:9 【综合】:9 【过程】:刚上榜,嫩妹+舌吻+D奶,都是我喜欢的,所以毫不犹豫出击。真人跟照片差距不大,基本一致,看起来比较小,看过身份证才放心确实06年的。长头发小圆脸挺可爱,奶子不知道有没有D,确实挺好摸,大屁股肉多摸起来得劲儿,后面女上和后入臀感啪啪起来真不错。见面抱着在床上坐一会儿,调教一下,骑在我身上亲吻抚摸,互相帮脱衣服,脱裤子。一起洗澡也很乖帮我洗前洗后。床上花样不多,主要是我主动,吃蛇吃奶子,年轻大奶手感不错,乳晕不大。身上有纹身,精神小妹的感觉,自己也比较后悔年轻不懂事。 一边口我,我一边摸奶模逼。蝴蝶状,一会儿就出水了。还69了一会儿,互相服务,差不多就带套日。妹子相当配合,舌吻管够,姿势随便摆。女上开始,中间换后入,最后传教士冲刺出货。全程态度很好,听话乖巧,十分配合。略显不足的是,互动不够…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @annini117. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“安妮🌈🌈” (@annini117), 151 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annini117.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.