Channel
@annyscent_work
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
558subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001531205593 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @annyscent_work |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/annyscent_work |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 558 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 559 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 560 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 562 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 562 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
69 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 31 | 44.9% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 21.7% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 21.7% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 4.35% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 4.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почему красивые работы не гарантируют клиентов Хочу сегодня разобрать одну ошибку, которую вижу у многих дизайнеров Они думают: "Вот сделаю идеальное портфолио - и клиенты сами придут" И начинают: 🐭 переделывать работы 🐭 менять оформление 🐭 добавлять новые кейсы 🐭 бесконечно улучшать профиль Но проходит месяц Два Три А заказов всё нет 🫰Почему? Потому что клиент не знает, что ты существуешь Представь магазин в т…
❤1🔥1
Я знаю, каково это сидеть без заказов 🙌🏻 Ждать, когда кто-то ответит и думать: "Наверное, рынок переполнен..." или "Дизайн не для меня..." На самом деле проблема обычно не в рынке Большинство дизайнеров просто не знают, где искать клиентов и как начать разговор так, чтобы получить ответ Именно поэтому я собрала все свои материалы в одном месте Сегодня открываю доступ в закрытый клуб дизайнеров «Клиенты на инфог…
🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
💕Ань, я очень давно хотела написать тебе слова благодарности за всё, чему ты меня научила, и за тот колоссальный толчок, который ты мне дала. Потому что до встречи с тобой я вообще не понимала, как выстроить систему, чтобы наконец-то стабильно зарабатывать на инфографике от 50 тыс. в месяц. Моя точка А: доход 5–10 тыс. в месяц на инфографике. Полное непонимание, как двигаться дальше и какие действия предпринимать, ч…
🥰3❤2🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥3🥰2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥3🥰2❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥3🥰2
Не знаю, как выстроить стабильный поток заявок на свои услуги инфографики 💋 Именно с таким запросом Сувая, мама двух прекрасных деток, пришла ко мне в августе На тот момент она уже делала инфографику для маркетплейсов, но доход оставался на уровне 5–10 тысяч рублей в месяц 👇🏻 • редкие и нестабильные заказы • постоянный поиск клиентов • непонимание, как выйти на более высокий доход • страх, что на рынке уже слишком…
🔥3❤🔥2🥰2
Sticker, posted without a caption
👆🏻Девчонки, это самый популярный миф Объясните мне тогда, почему мои ученицы без опыта находят клиентов? 🐭 Клиентов полно Проблема в том, что большинство дизайнеров: • не умеют себя упаковать • пишут сухо и одинаково • не понимают боли клиента • не умеют показать ценность Выигрывает не тот, кто “лучше рисует”, а тот, кто умеет: • решать задачу клиента • доносить ценность • общаться правильно 🐠 И именно этому я у…
🔥5
👌 небольшой подкаст на эту тему
❤3🔥2
На дизайне уже невозможно заработать - правда?
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @annyscent_work. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
отмечай 👇🏻
The shares total 210%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,540,621 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аня 🦊 MOMMY НА УДАЛЁНКЕ • дизайнер • клиенты без выгорания” (@annyscent_work), 558 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annyscent_work.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.