Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 35 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,406–1,419 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 04:15
1,417
+2
7 Sept 2026, 10:41
1,415
+3
2 Sept 2026, 07:35
1,412
-1
30 Aug 2026, 04:36
1,413
-1
27 Aug 2026, 13:28
1,414
-2
24 Aug 2026, 22:16
1,416
+3
21 Aug 2026, 11:38
1,413
+3
18 Aug 2026, 02:52
1,410
+3
15 Aug 2026, 01:18
1,407
-3
11 Aug 2026, 07:51
1,410
+2
8 Aug 2026, 11:53
1,408
no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:32
1,408
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
137 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
48
35.0%
❤🔥
42
30.7%
🥰
15
10.9%
💔
11
8.03%
🙏
9
6.57%
🔥
7
5.11%
😍
2
1.46%
🎉
1
0.73%
👍
1
0.73%
🤗
1
0.73%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
До 31 августа еще принимаем украшения на полировку мелких царапин «раз в год»🌸а затем уже с 15 ноября ~
Если вы в Питере или планируете приехать в августе, полировка царапинок займет от 2 до 4 дней в зависимости от количества украшений и загруженности✺
Но если очень спешите, напишите за несколько дней с фото украшений, сориентируем заранее по срокам готовности🤌
••• перед полировкой украшения необходимо самостоятель…
Дорогие‼️
Сегодня утром была рассылка мошенниками в личные сообщения о скидке от копии нашего имени Энсэм, аккаунт @ensemuvelir
Не оплачивайте ничего! Это мошенники!
Мы не принимаем оплату на карту/сбп, не делаем рассылку о скидках, не пишем в личные сообщения тг, не принимаем заказы в телеграмме именно из-за таких мошенников❗️
Спасибо огромнейшее прекрасной Людмиле, что предупредила нас💓 Так ценним эту помощь🫶🏻
…
Острое и плавное кольцо ‘Эстэ шипы ~ влюбиться в весенние пики гор Тянь-Шаня в перекатах узоров Узбекистана ۶
Чистые линии в своих естественных изгибах мягко отражают свет и иногда, так колко напоминают о себе в движение~
Ощущать их, чтобы ловить свои особенные моменты ⊹
В наличии размеры от 16.5 до 19.0, регулируется на +0.5 размера, 4500р.-
Комфортное по обхвату, при правильно подобранном размере🤌
Богемные серьги Этрэ ловить сияние топаза в струящихся перекатах, обнимающих его~
Так ждали с огранки эти новые топазы sky blue, c более глубокими переливающимися гранями💎
Застежка конго, 7200р.-
Добавили в новое кольцо летний аметист💜
В плавном склоне застывший согревающий камень у острых шипов вершин~
Уже в наличии в порту Севкабель в нескольких размерах, 6200р.-
Сегодня тот самый день, если вдруг планировали добраться сквозь к дожди к нам в порт Севкабель✨ можно воспользоваться скидкой -15% по кодовому слову «Июнь» на все наличие
17 июня в порту от любой суммы🌻
Цех у выхода к морю, до 22:00
Несколько из нового🤍
В июле покажем все на модели, а пока в Питере примерить возможно в порту Севкабель
В Севкабеле традиционная скидка -10% от 6000р
Для онлайн заказов скидка -10% от 9000р💌
❤8🥰5❤🔥3💔2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ansem_store. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ansem_store named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ensemuvelir named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Энсэм 🤍 ювелирные изделия ‘Энсэм украшения” (@ansem_store), 1,417 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ansem_store.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.