6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 383–390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 15:57
386
-3
31 Aug 2026, 04:55
389
+4
23 Aug 2026, 05:46
385
-1
16 Aug 2026, 18:47
386
+2
8 Aug 2026, 06:04
384
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:16
384
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
79 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
38
48.1%
🔥
18
22.8%
❤🔥
10
12.7%
💯
8
10.1%
🤓
3
3.80%
👍
1
1.27%
🥰
1
1.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 6 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anthony_trihologist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🫶 Недавно у нас прошёл конкурс, и сегодня мы с девушкой воплотили результат в жизнь! 🙌
Сделали укладку по кудрявому методу + экспресс-уход от J&J ANEIRO «Жидкая эмаль»💫
Что это за средство?
Это профессиональное концентрированное протеиновое средство для:
🔹 несмываемого ухода
🔹 глубокой реконструкции
🔹 стайлинга волос любой текстуры
Результат - живые, упругие, блестящие кудри без утяжеления. Волосы выглядят так, …
6 месяцев после биозавивки: посмотрите, как живёт этот завиток! ✨
Форма держится отлично, а мы решили усилить эффект и добавить волосам роскоши:
✂️ Стрижка: освежили форму и добавили лёгкости.
💎 Уход Tokio Inkarami Limited: премиальная японская система, которая восстанавливает волосы на молекулярном уровне.
Что это даёт кудрям после биозавивки?
✔️ Завиток становится ещё более упругим и очерченным
✔️ Волосы напитан…
Раскрываем истинный потенциал ваших локонов ✨
Nashi Argan представляет инновационный сервис Kurl Identity. Это не просто укладка, это глубокое переосмысление философии кудрявых волос.
Процедура направлена на мгновенное восстановление текстуры и идеальное дефинирование (прорисовку) природного завитка. Волосы становятся эластичными, мягкими и заметно более здоровыми.
Показания к процедуре:
▪️ Непослушные, пушащиеся …
🌰 ВЫХОД ИЗ ТЁМНОГО: трендовый орех и корейский вайб✨
Непростая работа завершена!
🎯 Задача:
- Выход из тёмной косметической базы
- Создание благородного оттенка
- Стрижка с корейским вайбом
Что получилось:
Ореховый оттенок - один из самых актуальных цветов этого сезона! Это мягкий, тёплый оттенок с золотистыми бликами, который выглядит максимально естественно и благородно.
♀️ Корейская стрижка - объёмная, текс…
ПОЧЕМУ Я ИНОГДА ОТКАЗЫВАЮ В БИОЗАВИВКЕ? 💚
Иногда ко мне приходят гости с желанием сделать биозавивку на осветлённые волосы, а я... отказываю.
Да, именно так. И сейчас объясню почему.
ЧТО ТАКОЕ «НЕТ РЕСУРСА»?
После осветления волосы не всегда сохраняют достаточную прочность и эластичность для химического воздействия. Если волосы:
- Пересушены и ломкие
- Потеряли эластичность
- Сильно повреждены предыдущими процеду…
🎓 Три года пролетели как одно мгновение...
Вот и позади эти три года обучения в ! medcollege№1 🎉
Было всё: и взлёты, и падения, и бессонные ночи перед экзаменами, и невероятная радость от каждой победы. Но именно это время я буду вспоминать с особым теплом ❤️
Но на этом всё не заканчивается! Я продолжаю учиться и развиваться, чтобы делать сервис и качество услуг ещё лучше в @naturel_studio . Ведь для меня важно не…
❤20💯8🔥6🤓3
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @anthony_trihologist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@Anthony.trihologist” (@anthony_trihologist), 386 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anthony_trihologist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.