Channel
@anti_rafida
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
516subscribers
+31 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001841845446 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anti_rafida |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anti_rafida |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:30 | 516 | +2 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 514 | -2 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 516 | +16 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 500 | +5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:14 | 495 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 491 | +4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 487 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 485 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
17 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 82.4% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🛑 مما يحيرني حول حادثة كسر الضلع 👈 أنك تجد أن كثيرا من المتقدمين عند الشيعة ألفوا كتبا في مقتل الحسين، ومقتل علي، وحتى مقتل عثمان "من اجل النقد". 🔰 لكن لماذا لا نجد كتبا مؤلفة في كسر ضلع فاطمة ومقتلها، بل المفترض نجد هذه أكثر قضية تكون مؤلفة فيها كتب عندهم، أم أن الشيعة أنفسهم لم يكونوا متفقين على هذه الأسطورة الخرافية التي ينكرها كل عاقل؟ #كسر_الضلع
❤1
👈 بسند معتبر عن علي موسى ( الرضا ) ان أرض كربلاء هي كرب وبلاء وليست كربلاء 💀💢 !
😁1
⚠️ للتواصل خاص :- @ibnalslf
❤1
نهنئكم بقدوم عيد الاضحى المبارك اسال الله عز وجل ان يتقبل طاعاتكم وصيامكم احبتي
❤5💯1
💢#تحريف_القرآن (الخميني اللقيط يحرف القران الكريم .) 📚 مصباح الهداية ص ( ٧٢ )
👀1
👈 الخميني اللقيط عليه لعائن الله يقول بوحدة الوجود وانه ليس هناك موجود مقابل مستقل عنه 😱💢 🗣 يعني ( الخميني = ربه = كلب = نساء ) ههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههه
❤2
💢#تحريف_القرآن (وهُوَ قَوْلُ اللَّهِ عَزَّ َوجَلَّ : ﴿ فَيَوْمَئِذٍ لَا يُسْأَلُ عَنْ ذَنْبِهِ ، مِنْكُمْ ﴿ إِنْسٌ وَ لا جَانٌّ ) (۱) ، فَقُلْتُ لَهُ : لَيْسَ فِيهَا مِنْكُمْ ؟! قَالَ : إِنَّ أَوَّلَ مَنْ قَدْ غَيْرَهَا ابْنُ أَرْوَى َوذَلِكَ أَنَّهَا حُجَّةٌ عَلَيْهِ وَعَلَى أَصْحَابِهِ ، وَلَوْ لَمْ يَكُنْ فِيهَا مِنْكُمْ لَسَقَطَ عِقَابُ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ عَنْ خَلْقِهِ ، إِذَا لَمْ يُسْأَلْ عَنْ ذَنْبِهِ إِ…
❤1
👈 كاشف الغطاء ابـن المتـعة يمدح اسيادها واسيادنا ابي بكر وعمر (ع) ويقول انهما نشرا كلمة التوحيد😳🔰!! #فضائح
❤2
💢#تحريف_القرآن 🗣 (قَالَ الصَّادِقُ عَلَيْهِ السَّلامُ : وَمَا نَزَلَتْ هَذِهِ الْآيَةُ هَكَذَا ، وَإِنَّمَا نَزَلَتْ : فَلَمَّا خَرَّ تَبَيَّنَتِ الْإِنْسُ أَنَّ الْجِنَّ لَوْ كَانُوا يَعْلَمُونَ الْغَيْبَ مَا لَبِثُوا فِي الْعَذَابِ الْمُهِينِ. ) 📚 عيون اخبار الرضا ج (٢) ص (٥٩) 👈الماحوزي يصحح سندها
💢#تحريف_القرآن (قَالَ : وَسَأَلْتُهُ عَنْ قَوْلِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ : ﴿ هَلْ يَنْظُرُونَ إِلَّا أَنْ يَأْتِيَهُمُ اللَّهُ فِي ظُلَلٍ مِنَ الْغَمَامِ وَالْمَلَائِكَةُ ) (۱) ، قَالَ : يَقُولُ : هَلْ يَنْظُرُونَ إِلَّا أَنْ يَأْتِيَهُمُ اللَّهُ بِالْمَلَائِكَةِ فِي ظُلَلٍ مِنَ الْغَمَامِ (۲) ، وَهَكَذَا نَزَلَتْ .) 📚 عيون اخبار الرضا ج (١) ص (٢٦٦) 👈الماحوزي يصحح سندها
❤1
🔰 اخلاق امام الشيعة علي بن ابي طالب 😁❗️ 👈 يشتم النساء على المنبر الله يطيح حظه ☮😋,,, #علي
🔰 ( لنا حالات مع الله ) 🔰 📜 الخميني الكلب ابن الكلب والتبريزي الانصاري ينقلان الرواية هذه في مقام الاستدلال 🗣⚠️,,, 🗣اليس هذا خرق للمنطق يا يعافير؟ أنى للقديم ان يصير حادثا وأنى للحادث ان يصير قديما 😋💢! #فضائح
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @anti_rafida. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“وثائق من كتب الشيعة” (@anti_rafida), 516 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anti_rafida.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.