Channel
@anti_tech_apostles
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
700subscribers
+85 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003823444304 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anti_tech_apostles |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 15 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anti_tech_apostles |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 700 | +13 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 687 | +50 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 637 | +8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:09 | 629 | +9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 620 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 617 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 615 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
100 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 55.0% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 10.0% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 9.00% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 8.00% | |
| 🗿 | 6 | 6.00% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 6.00% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.00% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.00% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Palantir in one continent, Chat Control in another. It is official, Chat Control 1.0 is coming to Europe. With the world-system becoming more and more intertwined and technologically advanced, the system has to make sure citizens fit its needs. It is clear that Chat Control 1.0 will not serve to "protect the children", but instead to steal dossiers of information about the lives of average citizens to provide the sy…
👍5🔥3❤1
— Bertrand Russell in The Prospects of Industrial Civilization
✍1
Wilderness Front IG post ^^^ Anything but questioning technological progress...
❤3🙏2
The AI company Anthropic just revealed that three of its Claude AI models "unintentionally" got access to the public internet and broke into the systems of three external organizations during third-party safety tests. Anthropic later announced that the incidents stem from a supposed "misconfiguration" that left the test environments connected to the internet, ultimately causing the models to mistake real-world target…
🗿6
THERE IS ANOTHER WAY OF LIFE... Anti-Tech Apostles
❤10
"As technology progresses and globalization grows more pervasive, the world-system becomes ever more complex and more tightly coupled, so that a catastrophic breakdown has to be expected sooner or later." — Theodore John Kaczynski (ATR: Why and How?)
❤2
The free mind poses as danger to the system because it challenges its established system of control and influence. A free-thinking individual will be less susceptible to their manipulation through propaganda, social conditioning, or fear tactics. Those who think independently are more likely to question their authority and challenge their official narratives. Anti-Tech Apostles
💯7👍4
"Manifesto. Read my Manifesto. I've written a Manifesto. It's all in the Manifesto!" — Theodore John Kaczynski
These past two days have been a learning lesson for me, one which I will never forget. I am publicly broadcasting this message because I want to share my perspective on a very unfortunate situation that I have had to deal with, and also the lesson that I have learned. The realization that I have come to is that you cannot trust anyone online, even if you think you have gotten to know the other party well. This may b…
🙏4
>>View Instagram Post<< On July 9, the US Federal Communications Commission gave a green light for the construction and launch of a satellite equipped with a large mirror designed to redirect sunlight from low Earth orbit. The startup company developing the technology, Reflect Orbital, says the satellite could be used to reflect sunlight onto areas experiencing darkness, allowing large solar farms to continue produ…
❤4🔥2💯1
"We will argue that if the development of the technological world-system is allowed to proceed to its logical conclusion, then in all probability the Earth will be left a dead planet – a planet on which nothing will remain alive except, maybe, some of the simplest organisms – certain bacteria, algae, etc. – that are capable of surviving under extreme conditions." — Theodore John Kaczynski (ATR: Why and How?) Anti-T…
🥰3🔥1
As the world-system grows more tightly intertwined and more complex, the closer the technological-system approaches collapse. The more globalized a system becomes, the more vulnerable it becomes. A crisis in one part of the world-system would spread like a plague, eventually affecting every other part of the system. The technological-system, because of its inner contradictions, will therefore destroy itself. Anti-Te…
🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @anti_tech_apostles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ANTI-TECH APOSTLES🛠️” (@anti_tech_apostles), 700 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anti_tech_apostles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.