Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Иудейские древности

Channel

Иудейские древности

@antic515

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,104subscribers

+69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001312580844
TypeChannel
Username@antic515
Created12 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/antic515

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,0358,1138,0746 August 2026 — 8,035 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,035 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,036 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,045 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,042 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,055 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,052 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,073 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,089 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,107 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,113 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,105 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,112 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,110 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,104 subscribers8,1046 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,023–8,125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 17:408,104-6
13 Sept 2026, 20:398,110-2
10 Sept 2026, 04:588,112+7
4 Sept 2026, 23:418,105-8
1 Sept 2026, 03:458,113+6
29 Aug 2026, 02:468,107+18
26 Aug 2026, 03:038,089+16
23 Aug 2026, 03:478,073+21
19 Aug 2026, 14:528,052-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:558,055+13
12 Aug 2026, 20:358,042-3
9 Aug 2026, 23:328,045+9
6 Aug 2026, 18:288,036+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:198,035no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:038,035first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 8,104 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,590
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held45 (7 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total6,361
Reactions total297
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 38m
Average length
6m 10s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,892 reactions across 44 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,49930.6%
1,17123.9%
🙏91018.6%
🔥53010.8%
❤‍🔥2194.48%
😁1673.41%
💯1312.68%
🤔841.72%
👏360.736%
😱230.47%
😢220.45%
🙈160.327%
🤝160.327%
🕊140.286%
🥰120.245%
110.225%
🤯100.204%
🙉90.184%
🤷‍♀30.061%
🆒20.041%
5 further kinds70.143%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,892 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 44 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @antic515. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC461 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://youtu.be/BWlZ-HEgmqM?si=2oFHYVjTFuzQKm6X

👍11😁3💯2

28 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,060 views65 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Сегодня в 21:00 (мск) выйдет новый небольшой сюжет по вопросу зрителя: «Является ли курение лечебного каннабиса грехом?» Не пропустите.

👍24🔥22😁96❤‍🔥3🤔1

24 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC≈2,470 views107 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Xcf2218S8S0?si=Fl2Sqf_RbGW4312A

🔥44🙏29👍2011❤‍🔥3

24 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈2,370 views109 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Друзья, сегодня выйдет новое видео на тему: «Почему время ускорилось?» Мы уже обсуждали с вами этот момент – раньше казалось, что время тянется, а в последнее время годы пролетают один за другим! Узнайте, что Библия говорит об ускорении времени, и что конкретно говорил об этом Христос. И главное — что нам с этим делать? Не пропустите! Сегодня в 21:00 (мск).

👍60🔥27❤‍🔥6🙏6🤔43🤨2😱1

23 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈2,640 views140 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Сборник песен меня вновь заставил задуматься о том, что мы поем Богу

57🙏30😢19💯11🔥7❤‍🔥6👍4🕊3

22 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈2,430 views76 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Неважные темы Библии (прямая загрузка)

👍3421🙏16❤‍🔥5

20 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC≈3,130 views118 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Почему секс стал основой оккультизма? https://youtu.be/W--9bQwXiU0

👍69🔥20🙏188🆒2❤‍🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC≈2,950 views151 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

Друзья, рад сообщить, что сегодня состоится премьера нового видео на очень интересную и редко поднимаемую тему: "Почему оккультизм связан с сексом?" В этом выпуске я разберу истоки связи блуда с языческими верованиями, покажу, какую роль сексуальные практики играли в древних культах, и проведу параллель между языческим поклонением и поклонением Богу «в духе и истине» (Иоанн 14:6). Не пропустите. Уверен, выпуск не о

👍8722🙏15🔥14❤‍🔥54😱4

19 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈2,960 views84 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Троица (прямая загрузка)

🙏3818👍9🕊7❤‍🔥6🥰3🙉3

19 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈2,960 views70 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Чудо в Кане (прямая загрузка)

🙏3317❤‍🔥7👍6🔥4🥰3

19 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈2,780 views70 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Ионафан и Давид (прямая загрузка)

34❤‍🔥17🙏10👍4🕊3🥰2

15 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC≈4,110 views82 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://youtu.be/jIo2mG76V0Q?si=xJeZiH17va4dP5df

👍43🙏1614❤‍🔥7🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @antic515. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTCAnonymous Poll500 voters

Я посмотрел(а) сюжет о Давиде и теперь хочу:

  1. Продолжения темы (цари и детки)36%
  2. Новый сюжет на иную тему11%
  3. Без разницы. Всё смотрю62%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мир вам - Последнее время
@shalomfromGod · 31,165
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Иудейские древности” (@antic515), 8,104 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antic515.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.