Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Antifa Squads

Channel

Antifa Squads

@antifasquad

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

19,045subscribers

+312 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001400689598
TypeChannel
Username@antifasquad
Description🔴⚫ support your local antifa
Created17 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/antifasquad

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,60619,04518,825.56 August 2026 — 18,733 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,733 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,732 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,728 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,725 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,727 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,726 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,720 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,713 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,716 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,707 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,692 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,690 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,693 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,691 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,693 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,684 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,669 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,663 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,656 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,654 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,647 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,643 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,639 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,627 subscribers6 September 2026 — 18,612 subscribers9 September 2026 — 18,615 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,621 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,619 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,617 subscribers17 September 2026 — 18,618 subscribers28 September 2026 — 18,606 subscribers5 October 2026 — 18,627 subscribers9 October 2026 — 18,652 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,687 subscribers14 October 2026 — 18,715 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,713 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,729 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,762 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,784 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,825 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,852 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,869 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,881 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,895 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,918 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,942 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,952 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,969 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,973 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,983 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,980 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,979 subscribers2 November 2026 — 19,012 subscribers3 November 2026 — 19,026 subscribers4 November 2026 — 19,036 subscribers5 November 2026 — 19,045 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 91 days, net +312. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,540–19,111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 12:5919,045+9
4 Nov 2026, 10:1519,036+10
3 Nov 2026, 08:5819,026+14
2 Nov 2026, 06:5519,012+33
1 Nov 2026, 08:2818,979-1
31 Oct 2026, 11:0618,980-3
30 Oct 2026, 13:1018,983+10
29 Oct 2026, 13:3518,973+4
28 Oct 2026, 13:0618,969+17
27 Oct 2026, 11:3118,952+10
26 Oct 2026, 14:1518,942+24
25 Oct 2026, 11:2818,918+23
24 Oct 2026, 10:5618,895+14
23 Oct 2026, 13:5918,881+12
22 Oct 2026, 10:3418,869+17
21 Oct 2026, 03:1818,852+27
20 Oct 2026, 00:0518,825+41
19 Oct 2026, 00:2718,784+22
17 Oct 2026, 21:3818,762+33
16 Oct 2026, 18:1818,729first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.9%
avg views ÷ 19,045 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,200
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held34 (6 March 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total112,230
Reactions total2,274
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 15:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
545
Videos
161
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 56s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,185 reactions across 34 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,24251.8%
🔥2,60031.8%
🫡4946.04%
🗿3394.14%
👏1812.21%
😱1591.94%
😎1221.49%
😍480.586%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

1 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC≈6,060 views237 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Nantes🇫🇷 Acte II de la mobilisation contre la vie chère; une dizaine de fafs (connexion unvez naoned/ oriflamme rennes) sont spottés à agresser au hasard des manifestants dans la rue près du cornishman, leur pub fétiche. Ils finiront par croiser une équipe d'antifas Nantais. En surnombre et matossés ils mangeront 2 KO et rentrerons vite se soigner dans leur bar. On apprendra plus tard que le patron était de mèche ave…

❤152🔥40🫡24🗿10😎8😱3

1 Nov 2026, 14:30 UTC≈6,260 views162 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

31/10/2026 Lyon 🇫🇷 Comme dans la plupart des villes de France, immense flop de la part des neonazis qui s’organisent face à la mobilisation populaire. #LyonAntifa #Antifa #Squads

❤104🔥31🫡17😎6🗿4

1 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTC≈6,510 views218 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

31/10/2026 Rouen 🇫🇷 La mob « anticasseurs » des neonazis locaux se fait déchirer. #HappyHalloween #AttentionLesChaises #ChequeDeCaution #Antifa #Squads

🔥140❤41👏13🫡8🗿6😎5😱5

25 Oct 2026, 12:45 UTC≈11,200 views197 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

24/10/2026 Nancy 🇫🇷 Tentative des fascistes d’attaquer la mobilisation, ils sont mis en fuite rapidement et retournent à l’écart de la mobilisation prendre des photos pour alimenter leurs réseaux sociaux. #PinocchioFirm #Influvoleurs #NancyAntifa #Antifa #Squads

❤122🔥34🫡28🗿9😱4

24 Oct 2026, 18:26 UTC≈11,600 views319 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

24/10/2026 Nice 🇫🇷 🤥🤥 #BatardsOntCouru #OneManArmy #UneDeux #Antifa #Squads

❤205🫡39🔥38🗿19😎11👏6😱1

19 Oct 2026, 20:16 UTC≈15,000 views218 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

17/10/2026 Paris 🇫🇷 Tentative de ratonnade de l’ensemble des groupes nationalistes parisiens et de leurs homologues remois venus pour l’occasion qui s’est soldée par une réponse rapide et efficace des manifestants. Les nazis prennent la fuite et abandonnent l’un des leurs. Aucun mensonge, aucune communication n’effacera la vérité. Paris est antifasciste. #ParisAntifa #Antifa #Squads

🔥142❤49🫡13🗿7😍4😱2😎1

18 Oct 2026, 09:36 UTC≈12,800 views211 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

17/10/2026 Rouen 🇫🇷 Puisque la vidéo est habilement coupée lorsqu’elle est partagée sur les canaux de communication des fascistes, la voici en entier. Tentative d’attaque des fascistes sur une mobilisation de gauche mais après un gros contact, les identitaires sont mis en fuite. #CapcutHooligans #VousNeBluffezPersonne #LaRueCestNous #Antifa #Squads

🔥141❤38🫡20🗿9😱3

16 Oct 2026, 11:05 UTC≈12,600 views177 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

15/10/2026 Lille 🇫🇷 Suite aux mobilisations fafs sur les blocages lycéens, une équipe Antifa NP2C se mobilise dès le lendemain mais après leur coup de com minable, les fafs restent bien cachés. #tupasses5minutes #onreste5h #Antifa #Squads

❤133🔥20🫡12😱6👏3🗿3

13 Oct 2026, 08:24 UTC≈15,000 views342 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

13/10/2026 Paris 🇫🇷 Une trentaine de gudards armés tentent d’empêcher le blocage d’Assas, une équipe Paris Antifa se constitue immédiatement pour venir prêter main forte aux étudiants et dégager les nazillons soutenus par quelques flics débordés. Malgré le surnombre et un attirail d’armes en tout genre, les fafs sont pris en tenaille par la mob antifa et les étudiants bloqueurs. Seule l'aide providentielle des lacrym…

🔥216❤72🫡21🗿13😱9👏8😍3

9 Oct 2026, 09:04 UTC≈15,200 views193 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

06/10/2026 Albi 🇫🇷 Présence Jeunesse Albi Antifa aux côtés des lycéens et étudiants mobilisés sur le mouvement de blocage #JeunesseAlbiAntifa #AlbiLaRouge #Antifa #Squads

❤154🔥26🗿7🫡5😍1

5 Oct 2026, 06:17 UTC≈15,100 views176 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Antifascist mobilisation looking for the fascists

❤119🫡32🔥13🗿9👏2😱1

4 Oct 2026, 19:01 UTC≈14,700 views219 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

03/10/2026 Madrid 🇪🇸 Fascists from nucleo nacional running from antifascists. #MadridAntifa #Antifa #Squads

❤157🗿25🔥20👏6😍5😎5😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @antifasquad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @antifasquad as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Antifa Squads” (@antifasquad), 19,045 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antifasquad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.